The Official Xbox One Thread

Page 74 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,442
6,293
126
Aren't the Amazon pre-orders for the X1 split up into two SKUs, the Day One edition and the normal edition? I'm not sure if we were to combine them if they would beat the PS4 (probably not) but I don't think it's fair to look at the Amazon bestseller list.

its dumb to use amazon preorders for any kind of numbers since it cost $0 to preorder something. it's just like calling up a store and them reserving something for you and you not having any repurcussions if you don't show up to purchase it.
 

Tweak155

Lifer
Sep 23, 2003
11,448
262
126
snip

4. they claim they think they have found a great balance? fuck that it's not at all it's just a 100% ms controlled environment. if they really wanted "balance" hwat they would have done is what ps3 and 360 did this generation - offer games as BOTH digital downloads and disc based, and the disc based ones you can do as yo ualways could with buying/selling/renting, and then with the digital ones you can't do anything.

Exactly. Choice trumps all.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
4. they claim they think they have found a great balance? fuck that it's not at all it's just a 100% ms controlled environment. if they really wanted "balance" hwat they would have done is what ps3 and 360 did this generation - offer games as BOTH digital downloads and disc based, and the disc based ones you can do as yo ualways could with buying/selling/renting, and then with the digital ones you can't do anything.

This would be perfect for me. I would only buy the DD version and never worry about discs again. And the people who want to partake in the 2nd hand market, can.

However, make no mistakes, whether we like it or not, consoles are going to the license model. MS is ahead of the curve on this one. Music has pretty much done it. Once eReaders hit market saturation, I can easily see books doing it as well. People will fuss at first, and then they will enjoy the perks of having every book ever written in a single device that takes up the space of an iPad Mini.


I don't know if it has been mention yet here, but a MS exec has stated they have an always offline solution: the Xbox 360. =(
 

Atty

Golden Member
Aug 19, 2006
1,540
0
76
My concerns about my decision on a future console are:

1) is the PS4 really that much more powerful, and will I really know/care. I'm already fairly satisfied with current gen graphics (this is a flip-flop from the last generation where I was not happy with PS2/Xbox graphics).
According to a few friends of mine working for big game developers developing for the Xbox/PS4 (huge games shown at E3 mind you, not low budget), the consoles are so similar if you were looking at the bare hardware you wouldn't know a difference. What I guess you could call "benchmark" scores for what their engines can perform on any system are so close its almost a useless discussion.

They went on to say that the cloud based capabilities of the Xbox One will play huge into its overall power during its life. They didn't mention what they had managed to do with it though.

Personally, I think Microsoft went for something lofty with the Xbox One and fumbled a bit. I still want an Xbox One. The whole DRM and used game thing doesn't apply to me. I buy a few games a year and play them constantly. The Kinect sensor is a non issue that people are blowing up.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,442
6,293
126
This would be perfect for me. I would only buy the DD version and never worry about discs again. And the people who want to partake in the 2nd hand market, can.

However, make no mistakes, whether we like it or not, consoles are going to the license model. MS is ahead of the curve on this one. Music has pretty much done it. Once eReaders hit market saturation, I can easily see books doing it as well. People will fuss at first, and then they will enjoy the perks of having every book ever written in a single device that takes up the space of an iPad Mini.


I don't know if it has been mention yet here, but a MS exec has stated they have an always offline solution: the Xbox 360. =(

other than being digital, music is nowhere NEAR the console gaming industry.

with music you get what, 15 songs or so for $10 on a cd. the problem is people typically don't like all 15 songs, so they went to a model where you could "pay per song".

on top of that, a full cd being $10 or $15 or whatever isn't $60. i think a lot of people will have a hard time purchasing something for $60 and not having ANY kind of physical item. it is kind of psychological at this point.

they are just two totally different beats imo.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
other than being digital, music is nowhere NEAR the console gaming industry.

with music you get what, 15 songs or so for $10 on a cd. the problem is people typically don't like all 15 songs, so they went to a model where you could "pay per song".

on top of that, a full cd being $10 or $15 or whatever isn't $60. i think a lot of people will have a hard time purchasing something for $60 and not having ANY kind of physical item. it is kind of psychological at this point.

they are just two totally different beats imo.

Yes, different industries, but MP3 wouldn't have worked without players being marketed as such. Apple and their iPod pretty much made MP3 mainstream. The music industry's model changed entirely. Rather than going to a B&M store to buy a CD, people buy it from a retailer and download the content. Software is already heading in that direction. Pretty much every piece of software can be bought digital now, and there is some still offered on a disc. Soon, none will be.

Console gaming is heading in that same direction.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,442
6,293
126
Yes, different industries, but MP3 wouldn't have worked without players being marketed as such. Apple and their iPod pretty much made MP3 mainstream. The music industry's model changed entirely. Rather than going to a B&M store to buy a CD, people buy it from a retailer and download the content. Software is already heading in that direction. Pretty much every piece of software can be bought digital now, and there is some still offered on a disc. Soon, none will be.

Console gaming is heading in that same direction.

yeah i definitely see it going that way in the long run but not fully any time soon at all. as mentioned, the millions of people who purchased cod aren't going to spend $60 on something and not have a tangible thing to hold that they "purchased". sure some will, but you will have a lot of people who are hesitant to do that.

hah now that i think about it, it's going to change the whole holiday shopping industry too when this happens. no one will get to unwrap games at xmas, it will be unwrapping credit card looking items. so lame.

unless the prices drop drastically for day1 games, like to $40, i don't see this happening any time soon. i mean the physical media/cases won't need to have a cost anymore, shipping, and all the crap marketing stuff you see in stores. marketing is going to have to change a lot as well.
 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
They made the mistake of splitting between disc and DD. Had they made the full transition to DD only, adjusted pricing model accordingly, and allowed for sharing with so many people like iTunes etc it wouldn't be a problem.

My major gripe with Xbone is they took it too far with bricking discs.

DD only, $39 games, ability to share games with say 3 friends (only one in use at a time), and some kind of trade in credit on XBL market.

That's what I would have done instead.

I accept as a collector that eventually there will be nothing fir me to collect anymore when everything is DD only, but as long as there are discs they need to work forever and be completely stand alone.

Which brings up another issue: the box itself.

What happens if you sell you Xbox One itself, with all thousands of dollars ingames installed on it? They need to be tied to a device or transferable/importable to a new account. Retire from gaming and just walk away from you thousands if dollars investment without being able to trade/sell it?

The game purchases need to be a definitive tangible value and not just poof whenever they want.

But this is not what they want, its exactly what they DON'T want, they don't want to embrace DD, they want free money plain and simple, and that's why its bad. Its all about intentions.

DRM used to be about copy protection and piracy, now its about preventing the consumer from owning a product they paid for along with resell rights, etc and this is DEAD WRONG.
 
Last edited:

PricklyPete

Lifer
Sep 17, 2002
14,582
162
106
According to a few friends of mine working for big game developers developing for the Xbox/PS4 (huge games shown at E3 mind you, not low budget), the consoles are so similar if you were looking at the bare hardware you wouldn't know a difference. What I guess you could call "benchmark" scores for what their engines can perform on any system are so close its almost a useless discussion.

They went on to say that the cloud based capabilities of the Xbox One will play huge into its overall power during its life. They didn't mention what they had managed to do with it though.

Personally, I think Microsoft went for something lofty with the Xbox One and fumbled a bit. I still want an Xbox One. The whole DRM and used game thing doesn't apply to me. I buy a few games a year and play them constantly. The Kinect sensor is a non issue that people are blowing up.

Interesting. It will be hard to pass up on the Xbox if that is the case.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
They made the mistake of splitting between disc and DD. Had they made the full transition to DD only, adjusted pricing model accordingly, and allowed for sharing with so many people like iTunes etc it wouldn't be a problem.

My major gripe with Xbone is they took it too far with bricking discs.

It isn't that the discs are bricked. They still server their purpose, which is to install the game to the Xbox One. You just have to then purchase a license to play it. They are trying to go the entire PC route, but people are screaming about it.

Not that it really matters. People scream about everything. When Apple released the iPhone 4S the internet and mainstream media was ablaze with "outrage" over a late and incremental release. Yet it sold millions anyway...

The true test for MS comes after the holiday season. I have a feeling Sony will take an early lead, but MS will catch up, if not overtake them, in the long run. Sony just doesn't have any real system sellers as of right now. MS does.
 

AstroManLuca

Lifer
Jun 24, 2004
15,628
5
81
The Kinect sensor is a non issue that people are blowing up.

The mandatory Kinect causes several problems:

1. It's an extra thing you have to hook up whether you want it or not.
2. It adds to the cost of the console. Not surprising that the Xbox One includes a camera and costs $100 more than the PS4, which doesn't include a camera.
3. Privacy concerns. Do you really trust MS to play nice and respect your privacy the way they say they will? Forever?

At any rate, I don't see why anyone would buy an Xbox One when the PS4 is $100 less, more powerful, and they have all the same games (barring a small number of exclusives to each platform, none of which are that great). Xbox has Gears and Halo, both tired franchises way past their prime. The former Sony mainstays of MGS and Final Fantasy are now cross-platform. And you have Forza vs. GT, both great racing games.

Sony just doesn't have any real system sellers as of right now. MS does.

Like what? Honestly I see very little value in any of the exclusive games on either platform. Nearly all games are cross platform, and a large number of MS "exclusives" are just timed exclusives that will eventually become available on the PS4 anyway. And several Xbox One "exclusive" games (Titanfall, for one) are also going to be available on PC and/or Xbox 360.
 
Last edited:

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,442
6,293
126
It isn't that the discs are bricked. They still server their purpose, which is to install the game to the Xbox One. You just have to then purchase a license to play it. They are trying to go the entire PC route, but people are screaming about it.

Not that it really matters. People scream about everything. When Apple released the iPhone 4S the internet and mainstream media was ablaze with "outrage" over a late and incremental release. Yet it sold millions anyway...

The true test for MS comes after the holiday season. I have a feeling Sony will take an early lead, but MS will catch up, if not overtake them, in the long run. Sony just doesn't have any real system sellers as of right now. MS does.

again, if the game prices go the way on xbox1 as they did on the pc, then that is fine with me. buying new releases for $40 or $50 instead of $60 ... again, i'm all for that.

the problem is, with ms licensing fees, this isn't going to happen.

the pc market adjusted to the market. will it happen with the console market? well with the ps4 still being in the "classic" market, i don't see the x1 market changing at all since people can just go to the ps4 if they don't like it. with pc gaming, there is no "other" place to go.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,442
6,293
126
The mandatory Kinect causes several problems:

1. It's an extra thing you have to hook up whether you want it or not.
2. It adds to the cost of the console. Not surprising that the Xbox One includes a camera and costs $100 more than the PS4, which doesn't include a camera.
3. Privacy concerns. Do you really trust MS to play nice and respect your privacy the way they say they will? Forever?

At any rate, I don't see why anyone would buy an Xbox One when the PS4 is $100 less, more powerful, and they have all the same games (barring a small number of exclusives to each platform, none of which are that great). Xbox has Gears and Halo, both tired franchises way past their prime. The former Sony mainstays of MGS and Final Fantasy are now cross-platform. And you have Forza vs. GT, both great racing games.

my problem with kinect is that it is going to be a $100 paper weight that sits in my a/v cabinet plugged into the x1 the whole time. i'd rather just pay $400 and not have it.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
The mandatory Kinect causes several problems:

1. It's an extra thing you have to hook up whether you want it or not.
2. It adds to the cost of the console. Not surprising that the Xbox One includes a camera and costs $100 more than the PS4, which doesn't include a camera.
3. Privacy concerns. Do you really trust MS to play nice and respect your privacy the way they say they will? Forever?

At any rate, I don't see why anyone would buy an Xbox One when the PS4 is $100 less, more powerful, and they have all the same games (barring a small number of exclusives to each platform, none of which are that great). Xbox has Gears and Halo, both tired franchises way past their prime. The former Sony mainstays of MGS and Final Fantasy are now cross-platform. And you have Forza vs. GT, both great racing games.



Like what? Honestly I see very little value in any of the exclusive games on either platform. Nearly all games are cross platform, and a large number of MS "exclusives" are just timed exclusives that will eventually become available on the PS4 anyway. And several Xbox One "exclusive" games (Titanfall, for one) are also going to be available on PC and/or Xbox 360.
PS4 won't have Dead Rising, Killer Instinct, Titanfall, Halo, Forza. And you don't know if any of those are timed exclusives. You are just guessing. Dead Rising was only released on the Xbox 360; nothing else. What does Sony have? A bunch of indie games I can get on Steam for $5 each? No thanks. GT6 isn't even going to be on the PS4. Drive Club? GT5 looks better than that game. MS also has a better controller, a better online service (based on current offerings), uses a better streaming service, and has fantasy football stats. That might not be a feature you will use, but I will. And a lot of other people will as well. NFL.com and ESPN fantasy integration is a big deal. UFC is another huge deal.
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,712
427
126
tbqhwy.com
my problem with kinect is that it is going to be a $100 paper weight that sits in my a/v cabinet plugged into the x1 the whole time. i'd rather just pay $400 and not have it.


dont worry im sure MS will be glad to sell you a 50 foot cable for it at a reasonable price so you can get it in front of your seating area

 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
What happens when you sell your XBox One with thousands of dollars in games on it and are just done with gaming? Just walk away from it and lose it all?

Can someone else buy that box and inherit those games?

What value do the games hold in this circumstance?
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,442
6,293
126
dont worry im sure MS will be glad to sell you a 50 foot cable for it at a reasonable price so you can get it in front of your seating area


oh i don't even want it out infront, i want it in the dark closet. hell i'll probably put tape over the microphone and camera lens on it lol.
 

AstroManLuca

Lifer
Jun 24, 2004
15,628
5
81
DR was Xbox 360 only, but DR2 was cross platform. You're right, it's not officially confirmed whether DR3 is a timed exclusive or not, but MS has shown that they are happy to pay to get cross platform games first and delay the Sony version.

Killer Instinct is pay2win. I hope you enjoy always fighting against Jago. But I'm biased since I think all fighting games are the same.

Halo has been crap since 343 took over. I was a Halo fan for longer than most, and I liked Reach even as others were jumping ship, but 4 was the end for me.

Good point about GT6 though, it's unfortunate that they're not releasing it for PS4. At the rate Polyphony develops games, GT7 won't come out until this new generation is almost over. Maybe they'll re-release GT6 for the PS4 to tide people over.

The fantasy football thing is laughable though. That already exists, it's called "watching TV while holding a smartphone."
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,712
427
126
tbqhwy.com
i know i was just making a joke

boogie2298 did a youtube vid about kinect and how it thought he was a couch (hes a fat dude) was pretty comical
 

Tweak155

Lifer
Sep 23, 2003
11,448
262
126
PS4 won't have Dead Rising, Killer Instinct, Titanfall, Halo, Forza. And you don't know if any of those are timed exclusives. You are just guessing. Dead Rising was only released on the Xbox 360; nothing else. What does Sony have? A bunch of indie games I can get on Steam for $5 each? No thanks. GT6 isn't even going to be on the PS4. Drive Club? GT5 looks better than that game. MS also has a better controller, a better online service (based on current offerings), uses a better streaming service, and has fantasy football stats. That might not be a feature you will use, but I will. And a lot of other people will as well. NFL.com and ESPN fantasy integration is a big deal. UFC is another huge deal.

You're being narrow minded on this. Yes, currently one lineup might "outweigh" (all opinionated, in this case though I agree MS has a better current lineup) the other, but keep in mind there was a period of time where none of these franchises existed. Picture the time before Dead Rising, Killer Instinct, Uncharted, etc. It takes creativity to generate something that is a classic hit, not an existing product. That existing product has already made its mark on gamers.

If all we had were new Dead Rising games, no one would buy. So, if Sony shifts the market enough, that creativity will naturally focus on the PS4 platform, and we will start to see more titles there which take off.

In other words, there is no way to predict who will ultimately have the better exclusives. PS2 was arguably leaps and bounds better than Xbox, and then you have the 360 which was arguably better than PS3 on exclusives. Only time will tell.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,442
6,293
126
DR was Xbox 360 only, but DR2 was cross platform. You're right, it's not officially confirmed whether DR3 is a timed exclusive or not, but MS has shown that they are happy to pay to get cross platform games first and delay the Sony version.

Killer Instinct is pay2win. I hope you enjoy always fighting against Jago. But I'm biased since I think all fighting games are the same.

Halo has been crap since 343 took over. I was a Halo fan for longer than most, and I liked Reach even as others were jumping ship, but 4 was the end for me.

Good point about GT6 though, it's unfortunate that they're not releasing it for PS4. At the rate Polyphony develops games, GT7 won't come out until this new generation is almost over. Maybe they'll re-release GT6 for the PS4 to tide people over.

The fantasy football thing is laughable though. That already exists, it's called "watching TV while holding a smartphone."

while i know you are obviously ignorant about fighters, killer instinct will be f2p but also have a full version game for purchase, both being at launch.

i've also confirmed that the game WILL NOT have a disc based version, only a fully downloadable one. i asked the devs in the stream last night and his exact words were "downloadable exclusive" for it.
 

Atty

Golden Member
Aug 19, 2006
1,540
0
76
The mandatory Kinect causes several problems:

1. It's an extra thing you have to hook up whether you want it or not.
2. It adds to the cost of the console. Not surprising that the Xbox One includes a camera and costs $100 more than the PS4, which doesn't include a camera.
3. Privacy concerns. Do you really trust MS to play nice and respect your privacy the way they say they will? Forever?

At any rate, I don't see why anyone would buy an Xbox One when the PS4 is $100 less, more powerful, and they have all the same games (barring a small number of exclusives to each platform, none of which are that great). Xbox has Gears and Halo, both tired franchises way past their prime. The former Sony mainstays of MGS and Final Fantasy are now cross-platform. And you have Forza vs. GT, both great racing games.
An extra thing you have to hook up? You plug it in and place it. Done. You will probably never touch it again.

Yes it does add to the cost. It also adds to the possibilities creators have with their games. "Every console has a camera and a mic? Lets have them voice control squads and graft their faces onto their characters for deeper customization."

It is a $100 more but we've all seen time and time again that what a device can be shown doing (not claimed or theorized it can do) will cause it to sell no matter what the cost. If kids see the Xbox One doing some amazing new things in commercials they will pine for them. Parents will then purchase them. This is 'Murica. Thats how it is done.

Gears and Halo will still sell like $1 breakfast on a Sunday morning at a University. Everyone still wants to play them. A completely new generation is playing games now that never played Halo 1/2/3. They want these new games to the series.

Do I think Microsoft will play nice with my privacy? No more than Google, Yahoo, AT&T, Verizon, Time Warner, Comcast, etc. Another mute point. Microsoft doesn't want to spy on a bunch of us playing Halo in our boxers.

More powerful? Sure, by a small margin compared to what hardware is in the box. Lets not forget the proven track record of Microsoft's XBL service, the 20 or so days of no PSN network access, and the fact that Microsoft has BILLIONS of dollars to work on their infrastructure which is all tied together over their many areas of focus. Factor in cloud possibilities and endless resources of Microsoft and you have a winning equation. Beyond all that, it doesn't matter what the box can do. It is what developers do with the box. We won't know that for YEARS from now. I really don't care who is more powerful, I just want the one that does more for what I want.

Do I think Microsoft will do better than Sony? No, and I don't care. All I am concerned about is enjoying the few games I will buy for the system I get. Right now I want Xbox. I want more Xbox Live, more Call of Duty, more Halo, and more device integration. You want more of something Sony has to offer? Ok, go have that cake but shut up about it.

Maybe I am forgetting but did the Xbox camp throw this many stones at Sony last time? I feel like all the Sony fans are just banding together with hate against Microsoft. Its obnoxious. Go do whatever you want and enjoy it without throwing stones at someone else.

Note: My frustration isn't directed at you specifically. It really is against the entire internet.
 
Last edited:

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,442
6,293
126
You're being narrow minded on this. Yes, currently one lineup might "outweigh" (all opinionated, in this case though I agree MS has a better current lineup) the other, but keep in mind there was a period of time where none of these franchises existed. Picture the time before Dead Rising, Killer Instinct, Uncharted, etc. It takes creativity to generate something that is a classic hit, not an existing product. That existing product has already made its mark on gamers.

If all we had were new Dead Rising games, no one would buy. So, if Sony shifts the market enough, that creativity will naturally focus on the PS4 platform, and we will start to see more titles there which take off.

In other words, there is no way to predict who will ultimately have the better exclusives. PS2 was arguably leaps and bounds better than Xbox, and then you have the 360 which was arguably better than PS3 on exclusives. Only time will tell.

how is going by the facts and what we know about games coming out for a console being narrowminded?
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |