The R9 295 thread - Reviews are in - Quiet, cooler, fast, $1500

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

NTMBK

Lifer
Nov 14, 2011
10,269
5,134
136
No way 999. Amd is and will until 20nm be 28nm capacity constrained. Prices of 290/280 supports that.

AMD has been moving production of Kabini and the console APUs to GlobalFoundries- that should free up more TSMC 28nm wafers from their allocation, giving them more to use on GPUs.
 

krumme

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2009
5,956
1,595
136
AMD has been moving production of Kabini and the console APUs to GlobalFoundries- that should free up more TSMC 28nm wafers from their allocation, giving them more to use on GPUs.

Okey. Good point that will change it all. I forgot that. Do we know when that will have effect?
 

antihelten

Golden Member
Feb 2, 2012
1,764
274
126
Okey. Good point that will change it all. I forgot that. Do we know when that will have effect?

It might already have had an effect, seeing as they have finally built up enough stock of binned chips to rerelease the 7950 as the r9 280. Unless there was a reason other than lack of binned chips, for the big time gap between 280x and 280 launches
 

krumme

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2009
5,956
1,595
136
It might already have had an effect, seeing as they have finally built up enough stock of binned chips to rerelease the 7950 as the r9 280. Unless there was a reason other than lack of binned chips, for the big time gap between 280x and 280 launches

Naa. The 280 series is actually a new chip from a production point of view, made to have far higher fully working gpu per wafer. Its meant to be cheap to produce, meaning there is probably far less binned 280 than 2 years ago with 7950.

The design is depreciated long ago. Who knows perhaps this 7970(280) will be made for a total of 4 years ! - but at least its 3 years. Man when did that happen last time?

Now if eg the new MSI 290x is sold for 650usd, i have trouble seeing how the 295x2 with a fancy cooler isnt at least 1500 - more like 2000usd. Good cooling, good CF solution. The prices is just crazy. There is buyers for a card like this especially if its the first vs the NV solution - nearly no matter the price because its unique.
 

antihelten

Golden Member
Feb 2, 2012
1,764
274
126
Naa. The 280 series is actually a new chip from a production point of view, made to have far higher fully working gpu per wafer. Its meant to be cheap to produce, meaning there is probably far less binned 280 than 2 years ago with 7950.

That doesn't really change the point though, whether or not the 280x chip is a new design or not, it still took them almost 5 months to release a binned version of it. This was likely because of a lack of sufficient stock of binned chips (the fact that the new design was designed to have better yields wouldn't help either obviously*), and an increase in wafer orders may finally have fixed that problem.

*of course nothing is stopping AMD from binning fully functional chips, but given the demand for 280x, they would have had little incentive to do so.
 

Creig

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,171
13
81
That doesn't matter. What does matter is that 500W needs to be dissipated regardless of what heat goes where, it has to make its way off the board and out of the case. Doing so is going to be noisy with only one 120mm fan and one GPU fan.
Well, here you go:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonev...on-a-promise-with-exciting-liquid-cooled-gpu/

AMD delivered a constant 1018MHz GPU clock with no dips in performance. Whether it’s a few minutes or a few hours, you’re getting 1018MHz. I tested this using a 2 hour Furmark stress test as well as an overnight session of Unigine’s Heaven. That clock speed was unwavering. Not only is this extremely reassuring, but in real-world scenarios this dual-card is clocked even higher than a reference 290x. That should give you an idea where our benchmarks are headed.

1: A Radeon 295X2 is slightly quieter under load than two GTX 780 Tis. It is dramatically quieter than a single reference 290x.

2: A Radeon 295X2 is significantly cooler under load than even a single GTX 780 Ti. Nvidia has very efficient air cooling, but the cards still operate at a max temperature of about 84 degrees Celsius. Meanwhile, the 295X2 doesn’t crest above 60 degrees Celsius while under heavy load. And gone are the days of your 7990 blowing hot exhaust back into your chassis — with an assist from Asetek, AMD got the thermals right.

(The 295X2 launches on April 21st, and we don’t yet know how Radeon Rewards — AMD’s tiered free game program — will factor in.
So the 295X2 not only runs quietly, it also runs pretty cool. There should even be room to OC the 295x2 with the stock fan. Looks like AMD nailed it. Should be a monster of a card for only 1/2 the price of a Titan Z.

Still too much for my blood, though.
 
Last edited:

Gloomy

Golden Member
Oct 12, 2010
1,469
21
81
yup its even better than expected, i was thinking it will be in the 80c range.

http://hardocp.com/article/2014/04/08/amd_radeon_r9_295x2_video_card_review

mother of god...




windows 8.1 too.

lmao best part:

With the GeForce GTX 780 Ti we found the peak consistent clock speed on both GPUs went up to 1019MHz while gaming. This is higher than the boost clock on a GTX 780 Ti which is 928MHz. As we posted on the previous page, this seems slightly higher than we've tested in the past. Normally we've seen the GPU hit 1006MHz while gaming, but now it is at 1019MHz with this newest driver. We also noticed the temperature of the GPU was higher, at 87c, versus 84c on previous drivers. This higher temperature threshold has allowed the frequency to go higher, hence the 1019MHz. In any case, this means the GTX 780 Ti SLI configuration was providing us higher performance for this round of testing, so it definitely got to give us its best shot at stock performance without overclocking.
check out that DX11 optimization :thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:
 

Creig

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,171
13
81
We do not yet have a working GPUz for the video card, so we cannot show you all the temperatures of components. We utilized Overdrive to watch the temperature and load while gaming for these results. At idle, both GPUs were at 34c on the R9 295X2, this was by far the coolest GPU temps at idle. This was a big improvement over the reference cooler.

At full-load it gets even better. The highest GPU temperatures we detected were 69c on the R9 295X2. This is a massively better temperature than what we get out of the reference AMD R9 290X and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti.


The fan on the video card itself remains silent. At full-load it cannot be heard. The fan on the radiator also remains silent at full-load. The RPMs are low enough that the fans don't create an annoying noise while gaming. Those who disliked the sound profile of the reference cards fans will like the sound profile here. AMD has fixed the sound issue by using water cooling. Fan noise is not an issue with this card. This is pretty much a silent dual-290X gaming experience
Well, that's two sites saying the 295x2 runs cool and runs quiet. I sense a pattern developing here.
 
Last edited:

Shmee

Memory & Storage, Graphics Cards Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 13, 2008
7,542
2,542
146
Seems a bit pricey still considering it would be cheaper to water cool 2 290X's, even given inflated prices. And if one can get a good deal on 290(x) crossfire, plus WC equipment, the price seems even higher.

I guess we are simply paying more of a premium for dual GPU cards these days. IIRC, the previous generations were usually cheaper when it came to purchasing 2 top end GPUs versus 1 dual GPU card. This made the dual GPU cards make more sense, like an economical bundle deal. This is not the case anymore.
 

DarkKnightDude

Senior member
Mar 10, 2011
981
44
91
Apparently there is a 14.4 beta driver coming with the card release

"the 295X2 doesn’t crest above 60 degrees Celsius while under heavy load"

Nice.
 
Last edited:
Feb 19, 2009
10,457
10
76
Seems a bit pricey still considering it would be cheaper to water cool 2 290X's, even given inflated prices. And if one can get a good deal on 290(x) crossfire, plus WC equipment, the price seems even higher.

I guess we are simply paying more of a premium for dual GPU cards these days. IIRC, the previous generations were usually cheaper when it came to purchasing 2 top end GPUs versus 1 dual GPU card. This made the dual GPU cards make more sense, like an economical bundle deal. This is not the case anymore.

2x $599 for R290X = ~$1200.

+$110 x2 for 2 water blocks = ~$1420

Add in pumps, reservoir, loops, fittings. All that space premium.

I would prefer R295 X2 at around $1200 myself, but really, its a beast card and for a single card, allowing for QUADFIRE easily. Definitely worth the premium.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
Funny how some people in the other thread were so sure the radiator wouldn't be up to task. Full boost clocks in every game, quieter than single high end cards. Too much money for my tastes, but they did a nice job on this card.
 

guskline

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2006
5,338
476
126
Seems a bit pricey still considering it would be cheaper to water cool 2 290X's, even given inflated prices. And if one can get a good deal on 290(x) crossfire, plus WC equipment, the price seems even higher.

I guess we are simply paying more of a premium for dual GPU cards these days. IIRC, the previous generations were usually cheaper when it came to purchasing 2 top end GPUs versus 1 dual GPU card. This made the dual GPU cards make more sense, like an economical bundle deal. This is not the case anymore.

Agreed. But like you, I have a custom water cooled system (D5 pump/reservoir, 2 360 mm rads, fans, CPU block and gpu block). It sure adds up. I just priced the lowest 290Xs on Newegg and they average $600 per card. Add in $110 per water block and you are at $1420 vs $1500 for this card. For a gamer who doesn't have a custom loop this is probably the way to go. HOWEVER, for custom water coolers 2 R9 290xs plus blocks will most likely give better performance, especially OC'd.

This card appears running on max. The one review at Forbes said the max temp never exceed 60C but the Anandtech and Tom's reviews appear to be @70C. The throttle down point has been lowered to 75C so I don't think there is much room to OC (not counting the fact that the power in one PCI-E slot is maxed out with only 2 8 pins on the card).
 

Shmee

Memory & Storage, Graphics Cards Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 13, 2008
7,542
2,542
146
Funny how some people in the other thread were so sure the radiator wouldn't be up to task. Full boost clocks in every game, quieter than single high end cards. Too much money for my tastes, but they did a nice job on this card.

These are pretty much my thoughts. I wonder how it OCs xD
 

guskline

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2006
5,338
476
126
2x $599 for R290X = ~$1200.

+$110 x2 for 2 water blocks = ~$1420

Add in pumps, reservoir, loops, fittings. All that space premium.

I would prefer R295 X2 at around $1200 myself, but really, its a beast card and for a single card, allowing for QUADFIRE easily. Definitely worth the premium.

I agree the card is a beast but 2 Water cooled R9 290x cards will most likely clock much higher and thus perform better.

I have a custom water cooled system with sufficient rad space so from a cost standpoint 2 water cooled R9 290xs makes more sense (and cents) but for a non custom water cooler, no doubt this is a very good solution.
 

TreVader

Platinum Member
Oct 28, 2013
2,057
2
0
I think the real benefit here is that you can now quad fire 290X without worrying about throttling and PCIe bandwidth. 290X QF is also now an option on 990FX boards.
 

Creig

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,171
13
81
These are pretty much my thoughts. I wonder how it OCs xD
http://hardocp.com/article/2014/04/08/amd_radeon_r9_295x2_video_card_review/11#
As you can see we managed to achieve 1100MHz stable. In fact, our overclock took us all the way to 1140MHz, but games would lock up instantly when started. It wasn't until we got down to 1100MHz that games would run just fine. Since the default frequency is 1018MHz that is an 82MHz overclock. 1100MHz is the best overclock we've ever achieved on a 290X GPU without voltage tweaking. It seems the water cooling definitely helps. There is headroom to overclock higher thanks to the cooling. We experience a maximum temperature of 71c at 1100MHz. With some more voltage we could see these GPUs being stable at higher frequencies and maintain temperatures in the 70's. However, we did notice one thing, in Overdrive there was a maximum temperature cap of 75c. Therefore, without special supported software we may see the temperature max out at 75c and keep us from overclocking beyond that.

Time will tell how that works out, and once we can overclock with voltage overclocking that is when we think overclocks on the R9 295X2 may be impressive. By adding another fan on the radiator we may even be able to keep the GPU cooler, and thus achieve an even better overclock with voltage overclocking. In the end, we think the R9 295X2 has potential for being an enthusiast friendly overclocking video card with some extra potential thanks to the water cooling setup.
A pair of high CFM fans in push/pull, voltage tweaking and a mod to allow temps above 75c should allow this card to fly.
 

chimaxi83

Diamond Member
May 18, 2003
5,649
61
101
I'm amazed that little radiator cools the card so well. I guess I may have over built my system with 1080mm worth of push/pull radiator lol. Cool and quiet with zero throttling.

Nice performance advantage over 780ti SLI, though if you care about power usage, this card probably isn't for you. I suppose the premium price of this card is justified seeing as you're getting two water cooled 290x, but I still wouldn't buy it.
 

guskline

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2006
5,338
476
126
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/R9_295_X2/27.html

Very well without vcore mods. [H] got 1.1ghz, TPU now got abit higher.

Scales excellently since its not throttling like the dodgy R290X.

Silverforce 11 play the video on heat and performance which is around 7 minutes long. Pay particular attention to the card temp at the upper left hand corner and the max clock speeds. The temp is for the VRM which has a MAX of 120C. In the video the temp exceeded 100C. I also noticed when the GPU temp was at 71C the core was @925 to 935 which seems to support throttling.
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/R9_295_X2/29.html
The temps for the VRM are really high. Supposedly the software replicates a full out gaming stress test. Notice the card throttles down. I'll bet 2 water cooled r9 290xs which also included the VRMs with sufficient rad space would be much cooler and thus not throttle.
 
Last edited:
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |