Kastor Krieg
Member
- Jun 10, 2012
- 66
- 0
- 0
So have I to reported this user it's makes no sense to me why someone would argue with another person whom has made wild claims but never offers any proof and documentation to back up such claims sigh face palm :-( But really come on an 850+ post mantra about a GPU that performs as well as a 6950 and has problems holding a steady OC probable cause it is missing the extra 6pin and small PCB that it's bigger brother has.
:wub:
To invoke the hive-mind representing chaos.
Invoking the feeling of chaos.
Without order.
The Nezperdian hive-mind of chaos. Zalgo.
He Who Waits Behind The Wall.
ZALGO! He comes.
Sure here you go. Running at lower resolution puts more stress on CPU so it will advantage the 2500k but whatever. I've actually been spending more time with my PC benching than playing games. Gonna try and go for 1200 tonight. i'm such a geek.
FPS:
61.5
Scores:
1550
Min FPS:
26.6
Max FPS:
127.8
See? The general mean FPS is the same, score is about the same, top FPS exactly the same - that's the card itself - but I also got 25% more minimum FPS and that's where the CPU shows. I'm currently running it @ 4.6 Ghz. I have a 4.8 Ghz config, but it's 04:20 here now and I just don't have it in me to reclock it and bench again. I believe though, the differenc in minimum FPS would be even more pronounced.
FPS:
63.2
Scores:
1593
Min FPS:
33.1
Max FPS:
128.8