can you guys just please stop? I don't need Nancy's face creeping over AOC's shoulder in my nightly dreams.
Thanks.
Are you over your crush on Hillary?Her or Pelosi... decisions decisions.... Hmmmmm
Sinema has teeth that would give Giger nightmares.They'd both be behind Sinema in mine.
I think if you took the bra off, she'd probably become bottom heavy.If you like top heavy, Pelosi's got it going.
I think if you took the bra off, she'd probably become bottom heavy.
You make it sound like a bad thing.
It's also worth noting that she's likely the most attractive woman in congress. That's gota count for something.
can you guys just please stop? I don't need Nancy's face creeping over AOC's shoulder in my nightly dreams.
Thanks.
Oh no it'll be worse than Pelosi's face creeping over AOC's shoulder...
it'll be AOC reaches up and rips off a Mission Impossible Mask and the person whom you thought was AOC engulfing your gonads with her sweet fountain of life is actually Pelosi trying to steal your life essences with her death vortex....
_____
I think it's implied whenever you hire a straight male. I've never met a man in my life that didn't appreciate a good turd cutter.Not saying it's a bad thing just saying that it's (unfortunately for him) in all likelihood just not part of his job description...
I think it's implied whenever you hire a straight male. I've never met a man in my life that didn't appreciate a good turd cutter.
Given Pelosi’s age she’s pretty attractive
More interesting question is will AOC look better than Pelosi in roughly 50 years.
You guys really need to learn to type porn into google because if that's what you find "interesting" you must be desperately lonely to the point that I worry for any living creature within 50 feet to you. No joke, that's the level of intelligence I expect from rapists, because if you genuinely cannot talk about women for basically any amount of time without proclaiming your level of attraction, then you have serious problems with self control and are exhibiting the behavior of sexual predators.
Get off your high horse nancy, and take your holier than thou bullshit elsewhere.You guys really need to learn to type porn into google because if that's what you find "interesting" you must be desperately lonely to the point that I worry for any living creature within 50 feet to you. No joke, that's the level of intelligence I expect from rapists, because if you genuinely cannot talk about women for basically any amount of time without proclaiming your level of attraction, then you have serious problems with self control and are exhibiting the behavior of sexual predators.
Holy cow!And pointy elbows? I thought the pinup-esque outfit she wore to her swearing in looked great.
And here:
View attachment 2586
I've said it before...
She's smart
She's witty
She's (now) powerful (and growing every day)
She's a WoC
She's vocal on topics that the majority of Americans agree with
She's attractive
She is, quite literally, everything the old white males and boomers in the GOP fear the most. And she's energizing the younger voting base every day. The more they attack her online, and she returns volley - these kids see that exchange and get behind her (and her contemporaries) more and more. She's playing a game that the established politicians can't even begin to understand let alone try to keep up with.
She's on the easy path to popularity. That's not a bad thing or any kind of dismissal, it's just the way it is. People like the idea of taking from those with vast wealth, they like the idea of a total safety net where failure isn't allowed. They want free health care and free collage. None of these are new ideas. What most don't consider is what their personal contribution to that system will be. The mantra is "tax the rich", and that's not a bad idea, but what's rich? Here in the bay area $117k a year is low income, in Alabama that's living large.I've said it before...
She's smart
She's witty
She's (now) powerful (and growing every day)
She's a WoC
She's vocal on topics that the majority of Americans agree with
She's attractive
She is, quite literally, everything the old white males and boomers in the GOP fear the most. And she's energizing the younger voting base every day. The more they attack her online, and she returns volley - these kids see that exchange and get behind her (and her contemporaries) more and more. She's playing a game that the established politicians can't even begin to understand let alone try to keep up with.
She's on the easy path to popularity. That's not a bad thing or any kind of dismissal, it's just the way it is. People like the idea of taking from those with vast wealth, they like the idea of a total safety net where failure isn't allowed. They want free health care and free collage. None of these are new ideas. What most don't consider is what their personal contribution to that system will be. The mantra is "tax the rich", and that's not a bad idea, but what's rich? Here in the bay area $117k a year is low income, in Alabama that's living large.
These are very popular ideas as long as other people are paying for them, when it's your own pocket that's being emptied everything changes. Before deciding how great her ideas are I want to know exactly how much is going to be taken from me.
I don't want my neighbor to die because he can't afford a doctor. I don't want his kids to go hungry, and I'd like to see them educated because that helps everyone. I'm willing to pitch in for that, but before I do that I want to know how many hours of my labor I have to give to that cause.
I've said it before, we've had the sales pitch, now we need the engineer to tell us how it works.
In a general sense I absolutely agree but something to consider is that conservatives have been making health plans and tax cuts using magical thinking for...well... basically my entire life. It is abundantly clear that the vast, vast majority of the people criticizing her for her lack of details don't give a single, solitary shit about the details when it's a policy they favor. I'm not calling you out specifically for this but in general I think liberals are entirely justified in telling conservatives to fuck off when asked about the details. If conservatives can give a trillion dollars to rich people based on bullshit and magical thinking then why can't liberals do the same but instead use that money to care for the non-rich?
She's on the easy path to popularity. That's not a bad thing or any kind of dismissal, it's just the way it is. People like the idea of taking from those with vast wealth, they like the idea of a total safety net where failure isn't allowed. They want free health care and free collage. None of these are new ideas. What most don't consider is what their personal contribution to that system will be. The mantra is "tax the rich", and that's not a bad idea, but what's rich? Here in the bay area $117k a year is low income, in Alabama that's living large.
These are very popular ideas as long as other people are paying for them, when it's your own pocket that's being emptied everything changes. Before deciding how great her ideas are I want to know exactly how much is going to be taken from me.
I don't want my neighbor to die because he can't afford a doctor. I don't want his kids to go hungry, and I'd like to see them educated because that helps everyone. I'm willing to pitch in for that, but before I do that I want to know how many hours of my labor I have to give to that cause.
I've said it before, we've had the sales pitch, now we need the engineer to tell us how it works.