I watched news bits - which mostly related to Cohen and Trump. Where did they touch on AoC?
I watched news bits - which mostly related to Cohen and Trump. Where did they touch on AoC?Did you watch her question Cohen today?
Lol, the ironing.No real knowledge of facts, just illogical fallacies.
I watched news bits - which mostly related to Cohen and Trump. Where did they touch on AoC?
Here you lazy fucks.
https://taxfoundation.org/summary-federal-income-tax-data-2017/
Adjusted gross income 2015 top 1%: just over 2 Trillion
Tax 100% of adjusted gross income at 100% revenue collected just over 2 trillion. No where near 93Trillion needed for the fairy princesses dream deal.
I mostly watch Reuters for my news source, which they gave cuts to people questioning Cohen - None of the ones shown were from AoC, so I guess I'll have to look at it more in full to see what amazing bits she had.She is on the House Oversight Committee and questioned Cohen today.
I mostly watch Reuters for my news source, which they gave cuts to people questioning Cohen - None of the ones shown were from AoC, so I guess I'll have to look at it more in full to see what amazing bits she had.
$30T is healthcare for all isn’t it? Which would actually cost 2-5T less than what would be spent otherwise under the current health care system and cover everyone.OK lets take the low end 51Trillion over 10 years. At current levels, the IRS will take in 33.33 Trillion in 10 years. Wheres the extra 18Trillion going to come from?
$30T is healthcare for all isn’t it? Which would actually cost 2-5T less than what would be spent otherwise under the current health care system and cover everyone.
That “study” was about producing a big scary number instead of actually trying to discuss the merits or compare the costs in it compared to doing nothing.
Read the fucking link I posted asshat. Its detailed. If you have a problem with it, I look forward to your detailed analysis in detail.
He also projects IRS revenue as remaining stagnant over a 10 year period.You seem to think that IRS revenue is the only thing that is going to pay for any of these expenditures, where did you get that idea? Did you realize that if we invest in renewable Fuels and Low Carbon electric grids people are still going to have to pay their electrical bills. If we take what we pay for all health care related expenses currently that would likely cover the estimated 3.6 trillion in costs without any "net new" expenses.
If you think 6 line items covering a total of 91 Trillion dollars is "detailed" it's probably not even worth engaging in a conversation with you.
It's not about it being amazing. It's about her being especially capable. She asked specific questions and opened the door to getting at Trump's taxes.I mostly watch Reuters for my news source, which they gave cuts to people questioning Cohen - None of the ones shown were from AoC, so I guess I'll have to look at it more in full to see what amazing bits she had.
It's not about it being amazing. It's about her being especially capable. She asked specific questions and opened the door to getting at Trump's taxes.
For the earlier poster to talk about all of her inability and such, she proves that idea wrong almost daily.
Clearly you are incapable of reading and are a victim of right wing brainwashingI didn't realize that asking interrogation based questions during an interrogation of 20+ people vs 1 was an amazing feet.
I guess at this point we've really lowered the standards.
The IRS collected 3.3 Trillion from all sources in 2016. Tell us how AOC's 93 Trillion over 10 years will be paid for.
Has AOC ever said that she has a plan other than the bullet points she produced? That's what I'm waiting for.
I think the 9.3 trillion a year number is every bit as nebulous as the outline.
I didn't realize that asking interrogation based questions during an interrogation of 20+ people vs 1 was an amazing feet.
I guess at this point we've really lowered the standards.
I didn't realize that asking interrogation based questions during an interrogation of 20+ people vs 1 was an amazing feet.
I guess at this point we've really lowered the standards.
Imagine if the democrats (as well as primary republicans) paid attention to Trump early on the same way Republicans pay attention to this junior congresswoman instead of treating him as a joke candidate where we would be today.What I find amazing is how much attention the nation pays to a junior congresswoman who has no real power.
Personally I think it’s a testament to the power of conservatives to shape the media narrative but I think they are making a catastrophic mistake.
People like what she stands for. Giving her more attention just makes her stronger. Silly conservatives, you should have ignored her like you ignored Bernie.
Imagine if the democrats (as well as primary republicans) paid attention to Trump early on the same way Republicans pay attention to this junior congresswoman instead of treating him as a joke candidate where we would be today.
93 tillrion isn't even a real number.
anyway, it's still funny that you think, 40 years later, the billionaires are giving you all the money that they were gifted out of your pocket back...for some reason.
it's funny that you think that.
wait, no it isn't. It's fucking infuriating. because it effects me and everyone else. FUCK YOU, you fucking asshole dickshit.
I just listened to AOCs questioning of Cohen at the hearing. For being a big dummy like you righties allege, she sounds 10x as articulate as Trump
It's like she (once again) used her 5 mins to ask clear, concise, well thought out questions on the topic at hand without emotion or subjectivity. Meanwhile, most of the GOP (once again) took their 5 mins to talk about feelings, their conjuncture and their subjectivity.
Uhmmm, the outsized attention paid to trump is probably exactly why we are where we are.