The reason Intel is not producing hot chips anymore

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Spawne32

Senior member
Aug 16, 2004
230
0
0
Well not only that, but the average quality of system offered by big box retailers gone DOWN over the years instead of UP.

I remember not that long ago WalMart had lots of MicroATX systems with Core 2 Duo E7xxx or AMD Athlon X2, X4 at legit speeds, etc. Not GREAT systems, but at least usable imho.

Now they have a ton of AIOs and other garbage with AMD netbook processors, along with other neutered laptop crap. Look at this pile :

http://www.walmart.com/ip/HP-Pavilio...ows-8/27436153

http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-E-Series-E1-1500-Notebook-Processor.84852.0.html

"On average the cpu performance of the E1-1500 is a bit below an Athlon X2 L310 at 1.2 GHz. "

Barf. Yes, I've used one of those systems (not that exact model, but the same thing in a super slim case), and it was BEYOND horrible.

OMG that thing must be horrifically slow. lol
 

mikeymikec

Lifer
May 19, 2011
18,028
10,203
136
Yep, I came across an AIO with an AMD C-60 in the last couple of years. It was OK for the bare necessities (ie. word processing), but it couldn't handle a full-screen Flash game in the style of a gambling machine (ie. not very challenging in terms of system requirements). Aero had to be disabled in order for it to not act like I gave the task to a ten-year-old desktop PC.

I spent a bit of time after reading this thread looking up AIOs and kept coming across AMD Exxxx processor-equipped ones... I know that some idiots think that computers are only meant to last three years, but please, we're not all idiots. The price went way up by the time I started finding Pentium or Core i3 -equipped AIOs.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,377
126
Yep, and most of those better AIO's are still using low-clocked neutered laptop processors instead of the desktop ones, further adding insult to injury. One of my clients just bought one not long ago, and then took it back after I showed him what a bad deal he had gotten.

He got an i7 4765 23" HP. It was $1200 on sale. All he got for that $ was :

A 2Ghz i7 (!!!)
16GB Laptop Memory (two slots)
23" 1080P Touchscreen
1TB 5400RPM Laptop HDD
Wireless

Just pathetic. Turned around and built him an i7 4770 (3.4Ghz/3.9Turbo) MicroATX build with a 128GB SSD, 1TB 7200RPM Drive, 24" IPS, Win 8.1 Pro, etc. The only thing he lost was the useless touch ability which he didn't care about, and having the case and display being in separate components.
 

seitur

Senior member
Jul 12, 2013
383
1
81
When my company went through and replaced its desktops, it replaced them with more desktops. When I go to other offices, I see monitors with ITX cases strapped on the back (what do you call these? AIO hybrids?). Or I see Dell all-in-ones.

I think AIO's are the future for office computing, but I think the current desktops, AIO hybrids and AIO's running Win7 will not be replaced for a long time -- until the companies -- like mine -- that bought underpowered slow machines realize their mistake and upgrade. Once a company makes a decision on screen and CPU/mb, the thing will physically last years or decades. So why not buy the monitor with the system? AIO.

But business systems designed to sit on the desks of receptionists and caseworkers need not be large. So they will shrink.

Hobbyists like the larger boxes and motherboards because they give us room to work. Judging from the amount of effort expended and the number of companies expending that effort, it appears that there are large numbers of hobbyists out there.

Then there are the people who do serious computing with their desktops. How big is that market?

But it appears to me that although hobbyists and serious computing folks once were a large part of a small to medium-sized market, we are now a niche in a large market.

I am not sure if the hobbyist market will continue on its own, or piggy-back on the market for serious computing folks. What concerns me is if the market for the two continues to shrink -- even in relative terms -- the cost of our rigs will rise.
SFD - Small Form Desktops such like ITX, mini-ITX, NUC or other will win with complete AIOs. Not permanently because technology process shrinkage will work in full AIO favour, but for quite some time they'll be winning.

Reason is that they're cheaper and they're easily switchable, while not really taking more space. They can be strapped behind monitor, under the desk, on the side of the desk or left on the desk. One short and thin small cable to monitor. (especially once DVI and D-Sub will finally be phased out in favour of DP ). With mini-ITX or NUC you can have full advantages of AIO in 95% of cases for lower price + have some exclusive advantages AIOs don't have.

More companies will prefer it because it's cheaper. Good full AIO is expensive and it really has to be. Smaller companies will prefer SFD because it's uppgradable / switchable easily and for much cheaper.
 
Last edited:

T9D

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2001
5,320
6
0
PC's are dieing that's all there is to it. A lot of you people make me think of natural disaster situations where they refuse to see the rising water or the smoke from the volcano, go back in there home and start dinner while everyone else is running away. Or the stock holder that keeps saying "it'll come back"

It's not coming back. When I walk into realestate offices I see laptops now. When I walk into a lot of businesses it's laptops. My Mom's house has changed over to laptops a while back. Now her husband has changed over to an ipad and retired his windows 8 laptop. He has a keyboard for it and can't be happier. My mom actually mostly uses her phone most the time. Kids don't want PC's it's mostly done on their phones or tablets.

Eventually the phones will be so powerful you'll just wirelessly connect to your TV or a separate keyboard and screen and do everything you need. And now with cloud computing taking off it'll mean less to compute at home.

There will always be an enthusiasts section though. But that landscape will change too. Perhaps with a powerful tablet that connects with an outboard video card that is connected to your 4k TV or something. They will break new barriers to make things happen.

At some point too it's going to get to expensive to make enthusiasts PC parts since it won't trickle down anywhere to midrange owners that don't exist by then. The laws of volume/price will be gone. You'll probably be buying server parts or something for the diehards.
 
Last edited:

NTMBK

Lifer
Nov 14, 2011
10,269
5,134
136
Yikes, C-60 in an AIO is just embarassing. The higher clocked Kabini and Bay Trail parts, sure, I can picture that just about being acceptable... but a Bobcat part, in 2013? Owch.

My main issue with AIOs is the fact that you have to throw out a perfectly good monitor just to upgrade the CPU. With a traditional desktop you can upgrade the box every ~3 years, and the monitor about ~6 years- monitor tech really doesn't improve that quickly. It's the reason why instead of an AIO, I will always go for a regular monitor with a compact PC on a VESA mount. My girlfriend has a ZBox with a 2.2GHz Sandy Bridge in it mounted behind her monitor, and it's a great little machine.

I really wish more AIO manufacturers would use Intel's standardised thin mini-ITX format. Replaceable motherboard with standard layout for integrated video input, blower cooler for the CPU, direct DC input to the motherboard, and support for up to 65W CPU. It's a very nice idea, but it doesn't seem to have caught on much with the big manufacturers- probably because they want to kill off upgrades...

EDIT: The updated version of that ZBox is this guy: http://www.zotac.com/products/mini-...er/DESC/amount/10/section/specifications.html Packing a 2.5GHz Haswell quad core with turbo up to 3.7GHz, and a HD4600 GPU. It's pretty incredible what you can fit into a little VESA mountable box.
 
Last edited:

Spawne32

Senior member
Aug 16, 2004
230
0
0
PC's are dieing that's all there is to it. A lot of you people make me think of natural disaster situations where they refuse to see the rising water or the smoke from the volcano, go back in there home and start dinner while everyone else is running away. Or the stock holder that keeps saying "it'll come back"

It's not coming back. When I walk into realestate offices I see laptops now. When I walk into a lot of businesses it's laptops. My Mom's house has changed over to laptops a while back. Now her husband has changed over to an ipad and retired his windows 8 laptop. He has a keyboard for it and can't be happier. My mom actually mostly uses her phone most the time. Kids don't want PC's it's mostly done on their phones or tablets.

Eventually the phones will be so powerful you'll just wirelessly connect to your TV or a separate keyboard and screen and do everything you need. And now with cloud computing taking off it'll mean less to compute at home.

There will always be an enthusiasts section though. But that landscape will change too. Perhaps with a powerful tablet that connects with an outboard video card that is connected to your 4k TV or something. They will break new barriers to make things happen.

At some point too it's going to get to expensive to make enthusiasts PC parts since it won't trickle down anywhere to midrange owners that don't exist by then. The laws of volume/price will be gone. You'll probably be buying server parts or something for the diehards.

Exactly, not only does the computer market trend towards things being smaller, its what consumers want. We have hit a point now where going compact does not mean sacrificing the ability to use it in the real world.

I come from a time where building PC's in the late 90s early 2000s was fascinating to most people. But not only that, it was CHEAPER. It was either go out and spend 1500-2500 bucks for a good desktop from a name brand, or build your own for 500-750, and since that time, the price of retail computers has dropped, and the price of building your own computer has remained unchanged, if not gotten more expensive, because the demand just isnt there. I can't go out and tell my neighbors or cousins, "hey, dont buy that HP computer, I can build you a better one for less" because the fact is you cant. I can build you a faster computer, a higher quality computer, but fast isnt what it used to be. A 350 dollar best buy laptop is "fast enough" to almost everyone.

Not only that, but I used to be able to make a ton of money repairing computers, now they just throw them in the trash. I had a brand new mint condition HPG62 last year that someone just threw in the donation bin at my buddys work because it wouldnt boot. I spent 100 bucks repairing it, wound up with a brand new 500 dollar laptop, and you know what, that laptop was faster then my desktop.
 

tolis626

Senior member
Aug 25, 2013
399
0
76
I think the stupidity surrounding the "dying" PC is too damn high.

First off,most keep saying that the younger generations prefer tablets/smartphones/.That's a huge pile of BS.I'm 19 and,by those standards,I'm already a dinosaur.I don't want a tablet,I own a laptop that's on its way out to be replaced by a proper gaming rig now that I can afford it,and my smartphone is only usable for out-of-the-house computing.And I'm not the needle in the haystack.Most of my friends share similar views.Yeah,the smartphone in your pocket is great to check your facebook account on the go,but it can't even touch the PC.Tablets are better,but I see too few people using their tablets away from home/their office to think they are actually a viable mobile alternative and not a marketing stunt.I see many using laptops,but most of them buy cheap (<800€) systems.I couldn't care to count how many times I've heard people saying that there's no chance in hell they'd shell out over 1000€ for a laptop or over 300-400€ for a tablet/smartphone (On the other hand,I also couldn't care to count how many people with crazy expensive desktops I know).And that's what it comes down most of the time ; affordability.At least in this part of the world,laptops/tablets are the cheap alternative to a proper desktop.And when you can't have the horsepower,at least mobility sweatens the deal.Granted,that may not be the case elsewhere,but I doubt things are as tragic as many make them to be.

Another point I can't keep hearing is that the enthusiasts are a niche not worth chasing.I'll be pessimistic and say enthusiasts/gamers are >0.1% of the market.We are talking about a market of billions.BILLIONS.As in 10 digit numbers.Even 0.01% of it is a lot of people.Combine that with the huge profit margins of enthusiast chips/equipment,and it makes a hell of a revenue stream.

Now,I'm not denying there's a decline in the desktop market.There is one.It's just not as bad as some make it out to be.The desktop PC is not dead.It evolves,along with anything else.Its market share may shrink,but still it's there.

And to sum it up,I'll start my favourite car analogy.I think PCs are becoming like the sports cars or SUVs or trucks of the car industry.Yeah,the number of buyers looking at those categories is quite small.Too small in fact.The tablet/smartphone will kill the PC as much as the mainstream city car (The Smart comes to mind) killed the Porsche.I could go on with examples,but I think I made my point.

As for me?I'd take a decent PC over a tablet or laptop any day.
 

Spawne32

Senior member
Aug 16, 2004
230
0
0
tolis, you havent been around long enough to make any claims about the desktop computer not dying. lol
 

blackened23

Diamond Member
Jul 26, 2011
8,548
2
0
Well there you said it. Desktop PCs will always exist but will increasingly become more of a niche; I mean there are few people in the US who own a Corvette. There are enough people buying those for it to make financial sense to continue production, but it isn't a mass market item.

Desktops aren't mass market items anymore. Sure, there is a niche of PC gamers and content creationists that like desktops, but most people do not fit in this category. Nearly EVERYONE I know uses a laptop or macbook nowadays, whereas 10-15 years ago ALL of these people were using desktops.

Fact of the matter is, mobility caught on and portables are now better than they ever were. They're not as powerful as desktops, that is true, but the bottom line is that the CPU arms race is for mobility and efficiency - it isn't for all out desktop IPC. Heck, even for the data center and corporate world, ARM SOCs are catching on due to efficiency. This trend is not going away.

Again, desktops won't "die". But they will not ever have the foothold that they had 10 years ago. Most people would rather use a laptop or portable. So while desktop parts will continue to exist, what I see happening is that it will increasingly be a case of of PC enthusiasts buying cut down server parts with excessively high prices. It won't happen in the next 2-3 years, but I see that being the case perhaps 10 years from now - mobility as a trend isn't going away IMO, especially considering that mobile battery life is increasing by leaps and bounds every year.
 
Last edited:

ShintaiDK

Lifer
Apr 22, 2012
20,378
145
106
If anyone are still in doubt. All desktop chips on the market today are either server or mobile chips rebinned into the desktop. There are no chips that was designed with desktop in mind as the first priority.
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
Well not only that, but the average quality of system offered by big box retailers gone DOWN over the years instead of UP.

I remember not that long ago WalMart had lots of MicroATX systems with Core 2 Duo E7xxx or AMD Athlon X2, X4 at legit speeds, etc. Not GREAT systems, but at least usable imho.

Now they have a ton of AIOs and other garbage with AMD netbook processors, along with other neutered laptop crap. Look at this pile :

http://www.walmart.com/ip/HP-Pavilio...ows-8/27436153

http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-E-Series-E1-1500-Notebook-Processor.84852.0.html

"On average the cpu performance of the E1-1500 is a bit below an Athlon X2 L310 at 1.2 GHz. "

Barf. Yes, I've used one of those systems (not that exact model, but the same thing in a super slim case), and it was BEYOND horrible.

Oh I couldn't agree more. People buy those hunks of crap and wonder why as soon as they get even a couple applications going it slows to a crawl. Up until last year you could get laptops with the AMD C-50 processor. I had one come in for repair with the customer complaining it was too slow. I told her there wasn't much I could do. I showed her the WEI for that processor was which I think was a 2.8 and then showed her an older Pentium D which is approaching 10 year old technology that got a 4.5 score.
 

Cerb

Elite Member
Aug 26, 2000
17,484
33
86
Frequently connecting and disconnecting cords and peripherals to and from a portable device gets annoying. Even if only for the sake of convenience, many people would rather have a device that sits there and is always ready for them to sit down and go to work without having to fiddle around with anything.
It's called a docking station. On one side of your desk, you have the docking station, with all your office peripherals plugged in. On the other side, you have your keyboard, mouse, and maybe a USB hub, if your monitor doesn't have one, or you need USB 3.0. Avoid HP printers (they like to get re-detected as new devices, while Brother, Xerox, and Lexmark units don't have such problems, IME--I have no recent experience w/ non-networked Canons), and it works great. Of course, it seems most people get that, and think they'll take it with them, but then use it like it's a SFF desktop, leaving it docked 100% of the time . It's great for people that really take advantage of it, though.

AIOs are pretty popular, and good for many home users, but when something hardware-wise goes wrong, they're not easier to support, so I think they're not the best idea for business (they add cost, and save only a small upfront setup annoyance). You also get stuck with the display they chose for it, which may be crap.

Tablets, need to all have digitizers, and the software on the desktop needs to improve for touch, and software on phones and tablets needs to improve in features and available options. I like the idea of a tablet, but the implementations are still a decade behind what can be done by current hardware, just due to the poor touch screens and limited UIs--or, going Windows, and having UIs that need a magnifier and stylus.
 

Dadofamunky

Platinum Member
Jan 4, 2005
2,184
0
0
That'll either be an enormous device to attach to one's hip, or another display revolution is required, perhaps some sort of projector unit to shine the display up onto a (purpose made?) surface, or some sort of holographic projection.

Otherwise, there are reasons why people go for large monitors so they can actually see what they're doing, because I doubt that the next major revolution is going to involve everyone carrying around a super-magnifying monocle for their smartphone-type device.

To say that the desktop PC is going to be replaced entirely by the smartphone is as absurd as suggesting that smartphones are going to replace televisions. While there is some television-type watching going on on desktop PCs and smartphones, the large screen in the living room is hardly likely to be phased out. Such basic 'needs' for technology aren't going to disappear, but they do merge together, just like most people have something with a lot of computer-type functions sitting beneath their television already that digitally records episodes and can handle complicated schedules and probably browse the Internet too.

Everything you can do on a television could already be done on a computer that is more than ten years old. Who wants to bet that people were predicting the death of television ten years ago?

I notice you can't contradict me regarding Moore's Law, which is the foundation of my argument. In turn, I think your argument is absurd and doesn't recognize reality. Point by point:

1) "Display revolution?" Really? Uh, Thunderbolt? We already have a form factor suited for portable connectivity to large monitors. You might know about it, although I doubt it, given your non-argument - it's on 50 million smartphones. And on every Mac now manufactured.

2) Large monitors? Answered in Point 1. Really, this is like shooting fish in a barrel.

3) I wasn't saying anything about TV, was I? Not that it matters. Certainly doesn't counter my point.

Have you seen the SSD module form factors coming out recently? A terabyte in a circuit the size of a quarter. There's another illustration of Moore's Law, which is galloping ahead in the solid-state storage realm.

I would stand in line to buy a device that allowed me to carry my entire professional computing environment with me in my pocket, provided connectivity to input and output devices on both ends, and gave me the same communications I have now. We are 90% there already. In fact, I think it will happen in 5 years. I would bet real money that roughly by then, we'll have Sandy Bridge/Ivy Bridge power and compatibility on our hips and doing exactly the things I'm talking about. It's a matter of the right company deciding to do it. I hope it's Intel.

Disrupt the desktop dinosaurs.
 
May 11, 2008
20,041
1,289
126
For those that think mobile smart phones or tablets are the future.
Batteries will have to become better in order to power the more potent cpu's.
Or we get solutions where more powerful ARM cores are shutdown and energy saving ARM cores are running while being mobile. But the when placed on wireless charging docking stations, the more powerful ARM cores are active and the energy saving cores are shut off. One of the Nvidia tablet soc's has powerful ARM cores packed together with low energy slower cores. I can imagine this could also happen for X86 or IA64 in tablets. Several cores with different computation vs energy consumption ability on one SOC.
 
Aug 11, 2008
10,451
642
126
It's called a docking station. On one side of your desk, you have the docking station, with all your office peripherals plugged in. On the other side, you have your keyboard, mouse, and maybe a USB hub, if your monitor doesn't have one, or you need USB 3.0. Avoid HP printers (they like to get re-detected as new devices, while Brother, Xerox, and Lexmark units don't have such problems, IME--I have no recent experience w/ non-networked Canons), and it works great. Of course, it seems most people get that, and think they'll take it with them, but then use it like it's a SFF desktop, leaving it docked 100% of the time . It's great for people that really take advantage of it, though.

AIOs are pretty popular, and good for many home users, but when something hardware-wise goes wrong, they're not easier to support, so I think they're not the best idea for business (they add cost, and save only a small upfront setup annoyance). You also get stuck with the display they chose for it, which may be crap.

Tablets, need to all have digitizers, and the software on the desktop needs to improve for touch, and software on phones and tablets needs to improve in features and available options. I like the idea of a tablet, but the implementations are still a decade behind what can be done by current hardware, just due to the poor touch screens and limited UIs--or, going Windows, and having UIs that need a magnifier and stylus.

Why should I need to pay extra for a docking station? A desktop will already be cheaper, easier to use, more reliable, and easier to repair than a laptop or tablet. Having to purchase a separate docking station just adds to the extra cost of a laptop or tablet as well as the hassle of hooking and unhooking it every time you want to switch from mobile to desktop mode.
 

Shivansps

Diamond Member
Sep 11, 2013
3,873
1,527
136
another "x86 is dying" "desktops are dying" bs thread?

Just because tablets are selling more does not mean desktops will die, they are not used for the same tasks, also tablets are reemplaced FAST compared to a desktop, just check how fast are tablets today compared to 3 years ago, them try to do the same on desktop, thats the reason of why desktops are selling less.

Some people will want AIOs, others VESA/ITX, other regular desktops, these do similar tasks, but a tablet?! not even with BT, I5 haswell or even a A6-5200 on a tablet i could say that, what i gona do? buy a x86 tablet, plug in my keyboard, mouse and monitor and 10 USB hard disks? and in no way have the same power that my 2500K and 5850 OC? thats just retarded, not to mention that ARM is just useless for desktop, even if they could mach X86 performance.

Now, i can see why tablets may be eating intro Notebooks, while some notebooks can be used to do desktop tasks, they are generaly used for the same tasks as a tablet, thats why netbooks are almost dead, 2-on-1 tablets can reemplace everything from 10.1 to 13.3, but i can hardly see them eating intro the mainstream 15.6" sector.
 

mrmt

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2012
3,974
0
76
Yep, and most of those better AIO's are still using low-clocked neutered laptop processors instead of the desktop ones, further adding insult to injury. One of my clients just bought one not long ago, and then took it back after I showed him what a bad deal he had gotten.

HP and others are trying to position AIO as premium products, something they should not be.

The main market for AIO is the desktop computer, something which is fair cheap today. The AIO is supposed to stay in one place, so you shouldn't have to build it around draconian measurement parameters, much less use top of the line power sipping mobile processors.

HP and others should have been using ITX boards, low power desktop processors and medium grade components. That would give them a cheap desktop replacement, and the premium price would come from the design. On the premium segment you could field it with SSD, high end monitors, touch screen and even better design. That would give consumers products they would ponder buying.

But instead what we got is a giant tablet that has to stay leashed to a power outlet. Total nonsense.
 

tolis626

Senior member
Aug 25, 2013
399
0
76
tolis, you havent been around long enough to make any claims about the desktop computer not dying. lol

What's that supposed to mean?I've lived in a house with a PC and have been messing with it since I was 5.I built my first PC (With my father's assistance,but still it was mostly me) when I was 10 and I was gaming on my father's PC before that,even if it was just simple games.I have as much experience with PCs as I could given my age.It may not be much compared to some of the guys here,but I fail to see why it would discredit my opinion on the matter.

Well there you said it. Desktop PCs will always exist but will increasingly become more of a niche; I mean there are few people in the US who own a Corvette. There are enough people buying those for it to make financial sense to continue production, but it isn't a mass market item.

Desktops aren't mass market items anymore. Sure, there is a niche of PC gamers and content creationists that like desktops, but most people do not fit in this category. Nearly EVERYONE I know uses a laptop or macbook nowadays, whereas 10-15 years ago ALL of these people were using desktops.

Fact of the matter is, mobility caught on and portables are now better than they ever were. They're not as powerful as desktops, that is true, but the bottom line is that the CPU arms race is for mobility and efficiency - it isn't for all out desktop IPC. Heck, even for the data center and corporate world, ARM SOCs are catching on due to efficiency. This trend is not going away.

Again, desktops won't "die". But they will not ever have the foothold that they had 10 years ago. Most people would rather use a laptop or portable. So while desktop parts will continue to exist, what I see happening is that it will increasingly be a case of of PC enthusiasts buying cut down server parts with excessively high prices. It won't happen in the next 2-3 years, but I see that being the case perhaps 10 years from now - mobility as a trend isn't going away IMO, especially considering that mobile battery life is increasing by leaps and bounds every year.

I see what you're saying.However,the PC isn't like the Corvette.Take Mustangs,Corvettes,Camaros,Porsches,Ferraris etc,take custom cars,take SUVs and big trucks and the sport versions of cars otherwise not sporty (Audi RS4 compared to the family sedan the A4 is) and that's what the desktop is.At least the way I see it.

Yeah,it will become more of a niche,but still a niche with a very respectable number of people.The way I see it,it will be the best consumer computing has to offer.I fail to see people who are into PC gaming for example switching to a laptop of a tablet.And these aren't few.

What I would consider ideal is a laptop-like wireless screen/keyboard combo for the desktop.That way,you can have all the advantages of the laptop with the added power and upgradeability of the desktop.Add a tablet-like device for really mobile (As in out of the house) usage,and I think this would be a winner.Mobility is here to stay,I can't disagree.I just fail to see why it has to kill the desktop completely in people's minds.
 

Zodiark1593

Platinum Member
Oct 21, 2012
2,230
4
81
A tablet that can run all your office software but can also dock to a full size keyboard and monitor will be the end of pcs. I think I'll name this new device tabtop, or desklette, or even notelette. Trademark it now and make trillions from qualcomm
Let's see how fast your Desklette is when I throw some 3D rendering at it. Maybe it will burst into flames and keep the family warm during winter.

Summing up what some above had said, I can see tablets destroying the cheapo pre-built desktop market as those in this market have low processing needs anyhow (and cheapo desktops are crap in every measurement even compared to comparably priced tablets). What I don't see (or get why anyone believes this) is tablets ever replacing the mid and high end desktop market, AKA, the segment where you have a greater portion of users that regularly utilize the full extent of their hardware. Tablets are rather poorly suited to take up the job of these sort of desktops where the hardware can be under full load for an extended period of time, not even counting other factors like expansion.

What would be cool is the home cloud server taking off, where you have your powerful desktop handle the heavy tasks for your client tablets and even some form of remote control. For example, I could have my desktop in my room for my rendering tasks, and using something along the lines of a Chromebook (17" is my preference for laptops), be working on my project in the living room with the family, and then have my multi-monitor setup when I go back to my room. Mobile and desktop working in perfect harmony instead of killing one-another off.
 
Last edited:

Cerb

Elite Member
Aug 26, 2000
17,484
33
86
Why should I need to pay extra for a docking station?
Because you want portability, yet also the ability to leave peripherals plugged in.

A desktop will already be cheaper, easier to use, more reliable, and easier to repair than a laptop or tablet.
By how much? Most software costs per PC, not merely per user (not realistically being able to do that is one of the good points of hosted software, IMO), and that's going to take up hundreds of dollars, typically. It's often as cheap or cheaper to have a single computer, just on account of software. So, if you need/want a laptop, making that the only one is better. A desktop is no easier to use. That one is simply false (usability is equal, so long as laptop parts are sufficiently fast, which, if you can do your work on a laptop, they are). Also, aside from the HDD and ODD (if there even is one), there isn't much in the way of reliability problems, that I've ever seen. Easier to repair, sure, but the laptop still isn't easier to repair, if you have both.

Having to purchase a separate docking station just adds to the extra cost of a laptop or tablet as well as the hassle of hooking and unhooking it every time you want to switch from mobile to desktop mode.
And man, is that a hassle! With a bunch of USB dvices, you might have to wait all of 5-10 seconds, before you can use it again, twice a day (assuming you take it with you to lunch, and go home with it). Ugh! That it is such a hassle! Seriously, it's a matter of pressing a switch ad picking it up to go mobile, or setting it firmly down into the doicking station and waiting a few seconds, to go stationary. Worst-case, you might have to use a menu from your graphics driver's systray app to re-enable a specific multi-monitor config, though typically, they'll get it right, if the notebook's lid is closed when it is put in the docking station. The only major issue I've yet seen are HP desktop printers, hooked up USB, being detected as new devices, rather than the previously-configured device.
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
I hate the term "dying". That means it will soon be dead, like the CRT monitor/TV. I think the desktop PC will still be around for a while, but there is no argument they lost a great deal of the market share.
 

stockwiz

Senior member
Sep 8, 2013
403
15
81
Netbooks died because Microsoft wanted them to die. In order to get a cheap Windows 7 Starter license, netbooks had to have crazy limitations like a screen with no higher resolution than 1024x600- and those limitations stayed in place for years and years, even as screen tech rapidly improved.

They died because they were atrociously slow. My new Dell Venue 7 runs circles around my netbook despite the processor only being marginally more powerful. Android is just much leaner and faster to run on a small device.

A 1024x600 resolution display at 11 inches has the same pixel density as a 2560x1440 monitor at 27 inches so the low resolution on small screens never bothered me when I'm going to be typing on the keyboard anyways. In fact I found full 1080p at 15 inches on my lenovo was overkill when running XP years ago, the text was annoyingly small and I had to tweak it to enlarge the text.. not to mention the display quality of lenovos TN panels were mediocre at best. Tablets have higher pixel densities because they are held closer to the face and are touchscreens.
 
Last edited:
Aug 11, 2008
10,451
642
126
Because you want portability, yet also the ability to leave peripherals plugged in.

By how much? Most software costs per PC, not merely per user (not realistically being able to do that is one of the good points of hosted software, IMO), and that's going to take up hundreds of dollars, typically. It's often as cheap or cheaper to have a single computer, just on account of software. So, if you need/want a laptop, making that the only one is better. A desktop is no easier to use. That one is simply false (usability is equal, so long as laptop parts are sufficiently fast, which, if you can do your work on a laptop, they are). Also, aside from the HDD and ODD (if there even is one), there isn't much in the way of reliability problems, that I've ever seen. Easier to repair, sure, but the laptop still isn't easier to repair, if you have both.

And man, is that a hassle! With a bunch of USB dvices, you might have to wait all of 5-10 seconds, before you can use it again, twice a day (assuming you take it with you to lunch, and go home with it). Ugh! That it is such a hassle! Seriously, it's a matter of pressing a switch ad picking it up to go mobile, or setting it firmly down into the doicking station and waiting a few seconds, to go stationary. Worst-case, you might have to use a menu from your graphics driver's systray app to re-enable a specific multi-monitor config, though typically, they'll get it right, if the notebook's lid is closed when it is put in the docking station. The only major issue I've yet seen are HP desktop printers, hooked up USB, being detected as new devices, rather than the previously-configured device.

Software costs the same whether it is for a laptop or desktop, so that is a red herring. I guess you are entitled to you opinion, but I dont think you need to "roll your eyes" and be derogatory to mine. I do feel that it is an unnecessary inconvenience to hook up and unhook to a docking station when a true desktop does not require that. If you want to dock and undock all the time, more power to you. I dont feel it is necessary.

I also have desktops which have lasted up to 8 or 10 years, with replacement of hard drives. Neither myself or any of my family has had a laptop that lasted more than 3 or 4 years, and when a laptop or tablet has a problem, it is pretty much throw it away and get another. So not even including the cost of the docking devices, cost and performance advantage is still in favor of the desktop.
 

escrow4

Diamond Member
Feb 4, 2013
3,339
122
106
I just built me a 4770 box with 2 x 1TB SSD's and 16GB RAM. You know, a real PC for real work. Not a toy phone or tablet. PC's are not going anywhere. You need grunt you need PC.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |