Side note - with Intel potentially removing upgrade capabilities after Haswell, I wonder if this will swing a little financial support AMD's way?
AMD will probably be bankrupt or out of x86 by Broadwell.
Side note - with Intel potentially removing upgrade capabilities after Haswell, I wonder if this will swing a little financial support AMD's way?
What would you have them do?
"Quite possibly, the claim was made to debunk rumours about AMDs plans to halt development of high-performance x86 chips in a bid to concentrate on low-power products."
Heh, seriously? So they are NOT conceding defeat by Intel and backing off high end? Sounds like misinformation at work.
AMD have said they will not compete against Intel in the High End DESKTOP, they have said they will continue to compete in SERVER.
All i get from this is that they will not compete above the $200-250 mark in Desktop.
"Quite possibly, the claim was made to debunk rumours about AMDs plans to halt development of high-performance x86 chips in a bid to concentrate on low-power products."
AMD have said they will not compete against Intel in the High End DESKTOP, they have said they will continue to compete in SERVER.
All i get from this is that they will not compete above the $200-250 mark in Desktop.
@mrmt
Could you plz paste the link for the audio ??
AMD`s demise has consequences.
AMD`s demise has consequences.
There seems to be some very selective hearing in this forum.
Why the should Intel not go the BGA way?, its cheaper and technically more efficient - its the way it goes.
Probably jaguar - kabini - and the new Atom, will show x86 is still superior to high-end arm, but it will not last forever. Its a question of time. Saying 25-30 years here, is just pure bs. Just look 25 years back - a time when x86 taking over the server space was hardly imaginable. Things changes far faster.
What we do know is, that we dont know the future, except it will not be as it is now.
People want the BGA drama. And we get the same nonsense each time. LGA1156 doesnt overclock, Intel will kill off the overclocking community with LGA1155 and so on. We also had the ondie VRMs with LGA1150 will kill overclocking yet again. The original PCwatch article that everyone now quotes as trouth even wrote they aint sure and its only a rumour. The 2 feathers became 5 chickens again.
Intel most likely will make more money selling LGA based desktop chips. Where it makes sense to change to BGA is in the laptop segment that uses both BGA and PGA today. Also it makes zero sense for Intel to change in the middle of a platform. Plus they already show that LGA1150 supports 2013 and 2014 CPUs.
Had this discussion been about Skylake there could potentialle be something into it. But certainly not with Broadwell.
I can't say I do. When whoever said it was just a rumour, I'm very happy for that possibility, a lot happier than the idea of CPUs being soldered to boards in future.People want the BGA drama.