you sure don't even have greater than 1 IQ score. One can see that by just seeing your post history and contributions to conversations here since March 2009.
I don't care what high school kids and people without a third digit in their IQ, think of me.
I'm only afraid that AMD will go belly up and allow Intel to slacken off even more on increasing performance.I agree with you there. AMD only have themselves to blame for the kamakazi type of decisions they made lately. With that said, they still have a cpu lineup that offers some sort of a alternative and a gpu lineup that rivals the best in the industry and that's no small feat. That's also why you and others are afraid... they're still kicking and that bothers you a lot.
Considering I joined in April, why are you mentioning March?you sure don't even have greater than 1 IQ score. One can see that by just seeing your post history and contributions to conversations here since March 2009.
That is not how an adult thinks
Considering I joined in April, why are you mentioning March?
You must have a negative IQ. :awe:
At the end of the day, people shouldn't be trying to create their own version of reality and should instead face up to reality as it really is
your own sig says March, blame Anandtech Forum not me
and my IQ went above yours just now
What am I making up?You're the one making up stuff and not admitting Intel's wrong doing when several people already asked you to. Biggest troll award goes to you sir.
Your profile says so. If inaccurate contact Anandtech forum admins.Considering I joined in April, why are you mentioning March?
I joined on the 1st April, but it may have been the 31st of March in your timezone.i meant your joint date details right underneath your portrait hehehe
I have since explained it.Your profile says so. If inaccurate contact Anandtech forum admins.
Maybe first day of April would be appropriate considering how you post.
What am I making up?
You want everyone who is accused of something to be declared guilty before they even have their trial.
What a trailblazer in Judicial Matters you are. LOL
I have since explained it.
That is very cruel. :'(
At the end of the day, people shouldn't be trying to create their own version of reality and should instead face up to reality as it really is.
Because as a Publicly Listed company they have a fiducial duty to their shareholders, so when an opportunity to close a Court Matter comes along for a trivial amount to Intel, they do that, rather than run the risk of getting a jury as clueless as the OJ Simpson jury, who might find for AMD.Why did they agree to pay again? I wouldn't pay one cent to someone trying to blame me for something i never did. That's only logical
I have explained above why, but you may lack that third digit to comprehend it.would support the idea
that Intel paid 1bn to AMD for no reason or by sympathy...
Rebates were given under the conditions that no competing
product is sold by the firm benefiting from thoses kickbacks...
Still legal according to the Intel fanboyz.....
My knowledge is rusty, but afaik rulings by these commissions may be used as reference for future court rulings. That's why I'm not sure why you're focusing on that line between commissions and courts. Also, evidence and witnesses are cross examined in front of both.They are not Court Cases where any Court Decision was made against Intel.
You are getting Commissions mixed up with Courts and Settlements with a Court Decision.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superscalar
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CDC_6600
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CDC_6600
Intel took the design and incorporate it in to their x86 CPUs. That’s innovation as well but they didn’t invent Superscalar.
Every industry gives Rebates to "Not Use" its competition's products.
Opteron64 window launch is also flawed , actualy it was
launched in March/April 2003 , yet according to the curve
it still didnt gain significant market share two years later despite
being notably better than the competition , one can only wonder why...