IMHO still way, way too much paste. Paste is here to fill minor/tiny unevenness in the already flat surfaces. Meaning you only need small amount. Half of that applied will get squeezed out anyway.
Oh that video is wrong, I saw the real video on reddit. The real video is here https://youtu.be/Z1j3S6MKB_E
I figured you would need that much thermal paste as the CPU is massive.
YD1900A9U8SAE – 1900 8/16
YD190XA8U8SAE – 1900X 8/16
YD1920A9UC9AE – 1920 12/24
YD192XA8UC9AE – 1920X 12/24
YD1950A9UGAAE – 1950 16/32
YD195XA8UGAAE – 1950X 16/32
Kleine OPN Aufklärung:
YD = Ryzen
1900 = Nr
A9 = Thermal Power Dingsda
U = Sockel ID (SP3r2)
8 = Anzahl der Cores in Hex
S = Cache
AE = Revision wobei AE = ZP-B1 und AF = ZP-B2
Interesting, but I'm not convinced. When Threadrippers show up later with B2 stepping -- and are otherwise indistinguishable from Epyc's -- what will that mean?
But wasn't this so called B2 stepping supposed to fix some things, according to CPCHardware?The stepping "difference" could be simply artificial as well, to differentiate the two products at least on paper. If the two chips use the same microcode, I'd say it is then quite obvious.
But wasn't this so called B2 stepping supposed to fix some things, according to CPCHardware?
Personally I'd rather see fewer SKUs in the high end, though I've always hoped for a lower-TDP 16 core, just like the 1700.
https://videocardz.com/71319/amd-ryzen-threadripper-1900-1900x-1920-and-1950-spotted
What will naysayers say about Bits And Chips credibility if Fottemberg will be right about entry level 16 C Threadripper CPU price?
Good guess? It's clear they don't have any legit sources.
They do, actually.Good guess? It's clear they don't have any legit sources.
Hmmm.... Well if they release an 8 core chip I can't help but wonder if they shouldn't have included that in the first lineup/release. I'm betting I'm not the only one would rather save some money and get 8 cores but spend to get into x399, and possibly upgrade later. To me PCIe lanes and memory bandwidth is still a potential issue in the long term (on AM4). I mean, I'd expect the lowest clocked 8-core TR to be only a hair more than an 1800x.
How do you know?They do, actually.
What about AMD information?How do you know?
Half the things they've tweeted have been far from the mark, like soldered Kaby Lake-X, GP104 hitting 3GHz and price cuts on the 6900K. They were also wrong about high end Skylake dies, claiming a 32 core variant.
I understand that AMD themselves stated that the 2 extra dies that were delidded and discovered by Dr8Bauer or however you spell his game name was in fact spacers to gokd the lid on level to the other functional dies.
They still have some pretty dumb speculation however, at least in my opinion.https://videocardz.com/71319/amd-ryzen-threadripper-1900-1900x-1920-and-1950-spotted
What will naysayers say about Bits And Chips credibility if Fottemberg will be right about entry level 16 C Threadripper CPU price?
The only way that the 8 core exist with those specs is that it can overclock over 5 Ghz, just like the legendary i5 2500K.
They were also wrong about high end Skylake dies, claiming a 32 core variant.
A new stepping usually contains minor hardware bug fixes. As only Epyc uses B2 stepping the fixes may be related to a part of Zeppelin only used in Epyc chips. To rumor further maybe early Threadripper chips were Epyc chips before they caught the bugs that make B1 stepping unusable for Epyc. Or whatever. Don't think anyone should care aside simple curiosity.Im not understanding here? Is zpb1 worse than b2 stepping?
Maybe one good source and plenty of filler stuff out of their @sses.They still have some pretty dumb speculation however, at least in my opinion.