Yeah, looks like EATX.That's bigger than full-size ATX isn't it? IIRC most "ATX" boards don't go full size ATX just like most mATX boards I see aren't the maximum size allowed by mATX specs.
Probably E-ATX. A biggun.That's bigger than full-size ATX isn't it? IIRC most "ATX" boards don't go full size ATX just like most mATX boards I see aren't the maximum size allowed by mATX specs.
Curious how that bracket works, I see no lever, so, you must lower the top, then screw it down?
I bet it's another fake, as usual. It's from reddit, and even worse a leak for AMD, the risk for a fake is very high therefore.
exactly linear scaling???.... I'm not convinced that's true.
It's probably fake. Look at the text on the 16C32T result. Different subpixel rendering vs CB's (it's almost pixel perfect by default, look at the inverted picture). Use my 2500k run as a reference to compare to.
Agree. What is interesting is what tdp amd will select for top bin. I think they simply go with same dies as 1600/1600x/1700/1800x? - anything better is better reserved for epyc.I'm inclined to believe that bench screenshot is faked - which is why I did not post it, despite ample opportunity to beat others to the punch here.
Despite that, the performance is within the expected range based on what we know about the performance of the 1800X at 3.1GHz, 3.6GHz, and 4.0GHz in that specific benchmark. Shouldn't be too much longer until we can officially confirm its performance.
Agree. What is interesting is what tdp amd will select for top bin. I think they simply go with same dies as 1600/1600x/1700/1800x? - anything better is better reserved for epyc.
If they chose to go high with tdp and we get dual 1800x i think the score will be as high.
Threadripper will stand on all the agesa updates up til now and perhaps some.
But its time for betting
Top bin cb score.
3100
... thats if they decide to use the same tdp as fx 9590 - tdp 220w cb r15 score 728Top bin at stock speed?
I'm going with 3333 as it looks like a made up score which should make it more believable.
You post an Ryzen 9 image made up by that junk site that makes up images all the time and you call this proof? Can't you see how bad it is? I can find you 20+ made up images like that from the last year alone.
1. That's a dual socket EPYC schematic. I don't know what you're trying to prove with it. I counted more than 44 PCIe lanes per socket.
2. Who said Threadripper is EPYC?
AMD confirmed that is TR is the brand name. So no Ryzen 9.
w3rd, here you go. Another proof that you should stop visiting that junk site that treats its readers as drug junkies and gives them anything to keep them going (back to their site).
you didn't even know there are Ryzen 3, Ryzen 5, & Ryzen 7 chips
Could be called Ryzen R9 ThreadRipper. Being called ThreadRipper doesn't preclude it from using the R modifier.
What is this "R" you're talking about?
Ryzen R3, Ryzen R5, Ryzen R7. I own a Ryzen R7 1700.
I dare you to find R3/R5/R7 naming on any official AMD channel
you are so blinded by your bias
You didn't even know ThreadRipper is a "Ryzen" branded SKU.
I don't remember it that way, but rather how it really happened: basically everyone agreed you're painfully wrong about Vega's performance, and then we finally stopped feeding you. I don't know why do you have this itch to spread misinformation but it sure as hell boters me a lot. On the first points: you simply don't know yet if it's delayed unless it's already the 30th of June and I have to get a new alarm clock. Vega is water cooled? I don't understand you again, we all saw the presentation: Vega also has liquid cooled SKUs and I'm sure it comes as a great shock to everyone...... but no, Vega is not liquid cooled, heck, even the main star-card of the show was a blower aircooled Frontier Edition and it already hovers around 1600 MHz as a mainly Pro card.I am definitely excite about Zen. It looks like AMD is on the way to a home run.
Hopefully AMD say something about Raven Ridge (for laptops).
Remember, over a month ago, when I said a lot of about Vega?
Namely that:
A) Vega has been delayed because B) HBM2 is too expensive and that C) Vega is liquid cooled and D) is 10% faster the Geforce GTX 1080.
A lot of people called my a liar and a troll.
If you haven't noticed, they have all gone silent.
exactly linear scaling???.... I'm not convinced that's true.
Not really, you could glue together two 1700's and you get that + TDP headroom to spare. The socket is rated for up to 180W.A 16c CPU at a 3.6 frequency sounds too good to be true. Especially at the likely price point.
The 1700 doesn't run @ 3.6 GHzNot really, you could glue together two 1700's and you get that + TDP headroom to spare. The socket is rated for up to 180W.
Don't conflate slow progress on the side of Intel on the con/prosumer markets as a technical and financial impossibility.
Wow.
0. Please don't call me "bro".
1. How is that picture "true"? Please explain.
2. I was saying that the naming Ryzen R3/Ryzen R5/Ryzen R9 doesn't exist. Of course Ryzen 3, Ryzen 5 & Ryzen 7 exist. What are you saying?! Please read carefully the thread of discussion:
3. So you're saying the name of a 16 core CPU will be AMD Ryzen 9 ThreadRipper 1950X or something similar to that? That's a mouth full of a naming disaster. I'm betting my money of something around the lines of ThreadRipper 1950X.
4. Bias towards what?
5. Did you even open the link that I posted confirming that TR is the name of the new lineup?
6. When debunking dubious information the credibility of the source has to be taken into account and that junk-site is well known for making stuff up and posting it as fact.
7. I'm sorry. I should not have recommended to stop visiting that junk-site. I just get the itch when I see people spreading the false gospel of that junk-site. I apologize.
8. In my previous post I have dismembered that product lineup to the bone. Care to bring a solid argument to keep it standing?
PS: Somehow, your post reminds me a lot of the comment section of that site.
Will be interesting to see how this all plays out. From my point of view, I am really judging these larger core count chips by how well they can keep up in single threaded applications. It is a given they will do well in multithreaded situations but who wants a slow CPU for the times you are not using all of the cores? I hope AMD has put some thought into this aspect as Intel seems to have shown some promise in this area.
The pic you are referring to is incorrect for very simple reason. It has posted 10 and 14 core CPUs, which are NOT POSSIBLE with Zeppelin CCX. Only 12 and 16 core configs are possible.Bro, I posted that pic because it is true.
I really do not care that you are so blinded by your bias, that you didn't even know there are Ryzen 3, Ryzen 5, & Ryzen 7 chips. You didn't even know ThreadRipper is a "Ryzen" branded SKU. Therefore, it will be called Ryzen 9.You are simply WRONG.