The Second Amendment must go

[LegendKiller]

Source

And?

 

[shady28]

And?

Sometimes I just like to post facts and not opinion.

 

[LegendKiller]

Sometimes I just like to post facts and not opinion.

What was the point of the fact?

 

[Brian Stirling]

so the gun owners would fight the non-gun owners or the military, who would be enforcing this?
My money is on the military.

Posse Comitatus


Brian

 

[MongGrel]

Source

Almost up to one gun per person.

Teasing just a little bit.

*No Euro Friends were harmed in the making of this post*

()

 

[shady28]

What was the point of the fact?

You're free to draw your own conclusions.

Anti-gun rights types will see something different from what pro-gun rights see.

What do you see?

 

[LegendKiller]

You're free to draw your own conclusions.

Anti-gun rights types will see something different from what pro-gun rights see.

What do you see?

I see gang shootings.

What so you see?

 

[shady28]

I see gang shootings.

What so you see?

I see a country with 15x the firearms ownership of south american countries, yet having 1/5th to 1/25th the number of firearms deaths as those same south american countries despite the higher ownership rates.

I see a slight negative effect of allowing unfettered and unregulated immigration from those same countries into the US.

I see no correlation between firearm ownership rates and firearm deaths.

 

[Venix]

Opponents of gun control are saying, as they do after every mass killing, that no law can unfailingly forestall a specific criminal.
Certain kinds of weapons, like the slightly modified combat rifles used in California, and certain kinds of ammunition, must be outlawed for civilian ownership. It is possible to define those guns in a clear and effective way and, yes, it would require Americans who own those kinds of weapons to give them up for the good of their fellow citizens.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24VA0tTTsvM
No one needs to own a firearm whose only design is to kill people.

Before anyone else wastes time replying to this buffoon:

The content of his post is plagiarized from this New York Times article. Maybe he's a dishonest content thief, or maybe he's just too stupid to know that quoting other people requires attribution, but either way he's clearly not interested in or capable of an honest discussion.

 

[michal1980]

Before anyone else wastes time replying to this buffoon:

The content of his post is plagiarized from this New York Times article. Maybe he's a dishonest content thief, or maybe he's just too stupid to know that quoting other people requires attribution, but either way he's clearly not interested in or capable of an honest discussion.

brilliant.

i bet his lefty buddies have no problem with it

 

[NAC4EV]

I'm just waiting for the next mass shooting.
Give it a couple days.



Front page editorial on New York Times,
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/u...editorial.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=1

 

[Brian Stirling]

I'm just waiting for the next mass shooting.
Give it a couple days.



Front page editorial on New York Times,
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/u...editorial.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=1

I wonder how many MORE guns will be sold and in the hands of Americans BECAUSE of that editorial...


Brian

 

[shady28]

I'm just waiting for the next mass shooting.
Give it a couple days.



Front page editorial on New York Times,
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/u...editorial.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=1

Just check the news out of Mexico, there are already mass shootings.

Nevermind that guns are illegal in Mexico and it doesn't fit your agenda. Just an inconvenient fact that needs to be ignored.

 

[Knowing]

I'm just waiting for the next mass shooting.
Give it a couple days.



Front page editorial on New York Times,
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/u...editorial.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=1

“It is not necessary to debate the peculiar wording of the Second Amendment,”

There's nothing peculiar about it and the rampant confusion about it's meaning is a 20th century phenomena that seems to correlate strongly with the will for more gun legislation.

Didn't read past that point because if this is their lead I can't be sure that there's any content of value.

 

[OutHouse]

If you are going to be shot or killed by American guns what would be the point?

Oh you were saying to go to Mexico because they have a better health care system to cover those injuries.

So are you supporting the OP and shredding the constitution or not?

 

[OutHouse]

I'm just waiting for the next mass shooting.
Give it a couple days.



Front page editorial on New York Times,
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/u...editorial.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=1

You are fucked up dude.

 

[NAC4EV]

You are fucked up dude.

 

[Svnla]

I wonder how many MORE guns will be sold and in the hands of Americans BECAUSE of that editorial...


Brian

It is already happening. Last Black Friday had the most FBI background search ever. With all the talk of more restriction from Democrats and executive action from Obama, sale will go even higher.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/in...es-jump-in-weapon-sales/ar-AAg3SdM?li=BBnb7Kz

 

[werepossum]

LOL not going to happen.not yet anyway and not in 50 years i would guess.

you are tired of bloodshed? you haven't seen nothing if you ban guns.


also once the 2nd goes a lot of other rights will too.


anyway if you know any history you know how well trying to take away things away has worked LOL

This, exactly. Overturn the Second Amendment - the one that protects all the others - and you WILL have civil war.

 

[DrDoug]

Angered by the front page editorial in the NYT, Erick, Son of Erick, the editor at Redstate, twatted:

I shot holes in the NY Times editorial - This is what I think of the New York Times edito… https://*****/XEJpuV05Kk pic.twitter.com/brh3KrODwS
— Erick Erickson (@EWErickson) December 5, 2015

Which prompted this response that made me lol:

You should see what Erickson did to the anti-rape culture editorial.
— David Waldman (@KagroX) December 5, 2015

 

[MagickMan]

So which Americans will you be killing?

Those that try to take your guns or those that simply disagree with you?

Will I be killing? Hopefully none. But if it comes to it, the former. I know, you're disappointed, you get a raging hardon every time you hear that someone was killed in a shooting, likely it makes you happy for hours.

 

[MagickMan]

I wonder how many MORE guns will be sold and in the hands of Americans BECAUSE of that editorial...


Brian

Another sick fuck looking forward to more shootings. You radical Lefties are some truly worthless bottom feeders, aren't you?

 

[Z15CAM]

I'm Canadian and I gotta laugh at Americans that come up here loaded for bear with belts of ammo and shoot up the forest hitting nothing.

We say keep them drunk and amused then their harmless. Meanwhile we will take out the game with one shot from a 30-30, SKS or 303.

One thing I do believe in is that Canadians should be allowed to carry a descent Pistol in the Bush.

 

[ctark]

Let's shred the constitution because a large number of gang bangers in Milwaukee are shooting each other..

http://data.jsonline.com/News/HomicideTracker/

Are guns really the problem? If by some miracle all the guns in Milwaukee were removed would there be peace and happiness in the streets or would gangs and drug dealers find another way to kill each other?

How many of those homicides were with legally purchased and owned firearms?

Shred the constitution? Do you not know how things work? He wants to legally amend the constitution, which is the only way you can change it.

 

[ivwshane]

Will I be killing? Hopefully none. But if it comes to it, the former. I know, you're disappointed, you get a raging hardon every time you hear that someone was killed in a shooting, likely it makes you happy for hours.

Says the guy that's ready and willing to kill Americans over a gun. You are a clueless dumbass psycho. Go clean a loaded gun