You are fucked up dude.
Another sick fuck looking forward to more shootings. You radical Lefties are some truly worthless bottom feeders, aren't you?
Shred the constitution? Do you not know how things work? He wants to legally amend the constitution, which is the only way you can change it.
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
"I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers."
- George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788
anyway if you know any history you know how well trying to take away things away has worked LOL
I personally believe that it's quite obvious in light of the wording of the constitution and the way in which the country was founded (a war beginning because of the attempt to take military equipment), it's obvious the 2nd specifically guarantees rights not just to self defense (as SCOTUS has already ruled on) but on possession of arms capable of combating military (which SCOTUS will never admit).I haven't heard of anyone talking about an Amendment to the Constitution. The left won't do that because they are way, way far away from having the support to do that.
What I've been seeing are a lot of left Dems talking about passing 'laws'. You cannot amend the constitution by passing a law or an executive order. Thinking that you can modify the constitution in this way is likely the biggest 'shredding' of the constitution one could imagine.
The 2nd Amendment :
Militia - this word is often used by revisionists to modify its original meaning to give the perception it is talking about the military or police etc.
They were not talking about the military or any public / govt force.
This is what they were talking about :
This is the process the left would need to follow :
Altering the Constitution consists of proposing an amendment or amendments and subsequent ratification. Amendments may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures.[1] To become part of the Constitution, an amendment must be ratified by eitheras determined by Congressthe legislatures of three-fourths of the states or State ratifying conventions in three-fourths states.
Yep, over time attrition through lots and lots of little laws can turn something plain and clear and almost totally bend it into something else. Then you can still have your amendments but they don't mean nearly as much.I could go on and on but you should get the gist. The key is to whittle them down slowly and not all at once.
I could go on and on but you should get the gist. The key is to whittle them down slowly and not all at once.
possession of arms capable of combating military (which SCOTUS will never admit).
The thing is the 2nd is already quite clearly infringed and not just in "commonsense" ways, but in clear ways contrary to the 2nd. There are states that require pistol permits simply to buy a commonly-used pistol, and these can be denied even to people who lack a criminal record. That is a lot of hoops to jump through.
You'll also note that the entry for "Arms" carries it's own legal citations.Black's Law Dictionary is the most widely used law dictionary in the United States. It was founded by Henry Campbell Black (1860–1927). It is the reference of choice for definitions in legal briefs and court opinions and has been cited as a secondary legal authority in many U.S. Supreme Court cases.
i take it OP doesn't go hunting
It's been a few years now. I mostly target shooting
Black Powder.
I'm Canadian and I gotta laugh at Americans that come up here loaded for bear with belts of ammo and shoot up the forest hitting nothing.
We say keep them drunk and amused then their harmless. Meanwhile we will take out the game with one shot from a 30-30, SKS or 303.
One thing I do believe in is that Canadians should be allowed to carry a descent Pistol in the Bush.
lol. Sure.
Why didn't you just say you use a matchlock and wear a coonskin hat.
Nothing special, It's a Thompson percussion.
I pour my own "mini balls" for my gun.
You should try pouring your own balls, you need some....
Says the guy that's ready and willing to kill Americans over a gun. You are a clueless dumbass psycho. Go clean a loaded gun
Why not remove the ? I already know you're a raging hypocrite, you have no problem with people dying to further your agenda. There's no reason to try and hide it. You revel in others dying in the hope that you'll see your own constitutional rights diminished. You're a saprophyte and one of the worst sorts of people imaginable, a sociopathic ideologue.
No. I don't want anyone to die "over a gun", I'm not like you. Our rights are about more than the implements to maintain them, but that's a subtlety you're too stupid to understand.
You are projecting again
Nope, you're a genuine piece of shit. I'll fight, and would kill, to defend this country's rights and liberties, no secret there. You hope for killings, and even want other members here to die. That says it all.
Nice Rifle.
:thumbsup::thumbsup:
Just have a .223 rifle these days, not deer legal, but I do not hunt them myself these days.
Sold a pretty freaky Remington 9 MM rifle a few years back.