I see Pumpkin’s trolling is spreading across forums posts. He ignores posts that challenge him on his bullshit.
I see Pumpkin’s trolling is spreading across forums posts. He ignores posts that challenge him on his bullshit.I'm not sure what you aren't hearing here - if you live in a household with a firearm you are more likely to die than if you live in a house without one.
You still aren’t getting it. Do you buy alcohol or motorcycles for the purpose of self defense?If I live in a house with alcohol I'm more likely to die than in a house without alcohol
If I live in a house with a motorcycle I'm more likely to die than in a house without a motorcycle
etc etc
That is the single dumbest thing I ever read. Also, guns are the great equalizer? Lmfao. i know, let’s give everyone pocket nukes. This way everyone has MAD and all violence will stop. That is the logical end argument for youIf I live in a house with alcohol I'm more likely to die than in a house without alcohol
If I live in a house with a motorcycle I'm more likely to die than in a house without a motorcycle
etc etc
I challenged him the Biden post and he never responded because all he has is his Breitbart feels. I mean i am sure the Jews were very accommodating to the polite SS guard as he walked them into the gas chamber.Nope, my original point of you not responding to fact checks or requests for evidence.
Firing warning shots?One of my favorite things about the ‘self defense’ nonsense associated with guns is they surveyed individuals who reported having engaged in defensive gun use and asked them to describe what happened.
Amusingly enough, even when relying solely on the gun owners’ accounts of what happened, which are presumably the most favorable possible to them, in a large proportion of cases the ‘defensive gun use’ described was actually the gun owner committing a gun crime.
That is the single dumbest thing I ever read. Also, guns are the great equalizer? Lmfao. i know, let’s give everyone pocket nukes. This way everyone has MAD and all violence will stop. That is the logical end argument for you
But we are Mericans. We got ourselves big bad guns to stop gun crimes And violence in our society. I mean look at all the gun violence in Europe and Japan. They have way more guns than us …. WaitOne of my favorite things about the ‘self defense’ nonsense associated with guns is they surveyed individuals who reported having engaged in defensive gun use and asked them to describe what happened.
Amusingly enough, even when relying solely on the gun owners’ accounts of what happened, which are presumably the most favorable possible to them, in a large proportion of cases the ‘defensive gun use’ described was actually the gun owner committing a gun crime.
You own a Harley don't you?If I live in a house with alcohol I'm more likely to die than in a house without alcohol
If I live in a house with a motorcycle I'm more likely to die than in a house without a motorcycle
etc etc
I don’t think exact examples were given but the study surveyed these individuals and then asked a group of judges to evaluate the responses as to the legality of their actions and it turned out most of them were just criminals.Firing warning shots?
It is darkly funny that the right wing response to huge numbers of people killed by guns each year by the like 400 million guns or whatever we have is that if we just had 401 million guns people would be safe.But we are Mericans. We got ourselves big bad guns to stop gun crimes And violence in our society. I mean look at all the gun violence in Europe and Japan. They have way more guns than us …. Wait
They also mainly live is cities with police forces that are politically and financially motivated to have low response times. They aren't calling a sheriff that may be an hour away. For most of the world truth on only a matter of whose ox gets gored. How people see gun regulation depends for most on how they see guns, friend for self protection, sport, hobby etc., or evil with the risk of being because of what's on the news.Firearms are the great equalizer. It is the only effective form of self-defense for a 90lb woman to defend herself against a 280lb attacker. It puts her on exact equal footing in defending herself.
And, very ironically, historically stripping away second amendment rights really only negatively impacted middle class and lowers ability to defend themselves. Anyone wealthy enough can hire an armed bodyguard when they go out, live in gated communities, live in areas with low crime.
What anti 2a people really are doing is a detriment to the middle and lower class
That is the single dumbest thing I ever read. Also, guns are the great equalizer? Lmfao. i know, let’s give everyone pocket nukes. This way everyone has MAD and all violence will stop. That is the logical end argument for you
They also mainly live is cities with police forces that are politically and financially motivated to have low response times. They aren't calling a sheriff that may be an hour away. For most of the world truth on only a matter of whose ox gets gored. How people see gun regulation depends for most on how they see guns, friend for self protection, sport, hobby etc., or evil with the risk of being because of what's on the news.
But understand, I support tightening gun restrictions designed to keep guns out of the hands of folk who may rationally represent a danger.
One of the key triggers that will make a man feel worthless is to be rejected by a woman, something self haters will unconsciously bring about because they can't believe in love and constantly test their partner's loyalty, driving them away in the process. Once this is triggered a self hater can become very dangerous. Same thing with losing a job or losing anything ego building related. This is all the more the case because the general population has no idea this is what is happening psychologically because everybody is avoiding that pain of being put down as children.
Without guns there would be no mass killings with guns but that's not where we are. No solution will be forthcoming from the crazies on both sides.
LOLIn an armed society, any criminal with a gun knows that if they cause someone to fear for their life they risk getting shot.
In an armed society, people exchange gunfire over increasingly petty bullshit.
Yeah cause that's exactly how it works for us.That's literally how nukes work. Every country with nukes know if they nuke someone else they risk getting nuked.
In an armed society, any criminal with a gun knows that if they cause someone to fear for their life they risk getting shot.
So the Vegas shooter would have killed 60 and injured 850 without guns?One of the worst mass casualty attacks is the nice incident with a box truck. 86 killed, 434 injured.
Our worst mass shooting attack is the Vegas shooter from a few years back. 60 killed, 850 injured.
Removing guns will not remove these crazy people.
I am guilty of all the evil in the world because I know what it would take to end it but I lack the knowledge as to how to convince you of it.I really want to be clear that I am 100% advocating for banning all guns.
Also, owning a gun for self defense is irrational as it makes you and everyone you live with more likely to die.
Okay let’s get back to this case. Was the original ruling right to take away his guns? Or his appeal the correct ruling because 2A trumps all?But understand, I support tightening gun restrictions designed to keep guns out of the hands of folk who may rationally represent a danger.
It's difficult to argue that people with a history of violence towards others are "responsible gun owners". But I'm really unsure how SCOTUS will rule since it seems the flood of blood from guns in this country is just what the tree of "liberty" demands.Okay let’s get back to this case. Was the original ruling right to take away his guns? Or his appeal the correct ruling because 2A trumps all?
The counter-arguments are all based on statistics that could not continue down the same course if guns were magically eliminated from the population. I can disagree with their conclusion only the utter futility of having that happen in the current reality. That is why I support work on the understanding of violence as related to self hate, and rational perhaps achievable gum regulations as negotiated by people of good will on both sides of the issue.One of the worst mass casualty attacks is the nice incident with a box truck. 86 killed, 434 injured.
Our worst mass shooting attack is the Vegas shooter from a few years back. 60 killed, 850 injured.
Removing guns will not remove these crazy people.
Or responsible gun owners die by drinking alcohol then playing with their guns.In an armed society, people exchange gunfire over increasingly petty bullshit.