Don't you think it would be a waste of time for me to try and convince you of something that you are never going to believe? Going by the polls, support for impeachment fell after the evidence was presented. This indicates that the People are not convinced, especially the vanishing few who aren't consumed by party politics. It's not a good look for the Democrat's effort.
I would think that a smart person such as yourself would see the above evidence and come to the conclusion that if Dems still pursued impeachment even though it wasn’t politically advantageous that that in of itself would highlight that impeachment wasn’t done based on political motivations.
Of course that’s also ignoring the fact that a sitting president, by his own admission, asked a foreign government to investigate his main political rival. The details of which are corroborated by the presidents own appointed people.
In fact it would take a real partisan piece of shit to come to the conclusion that because a party who has engaged in the most partisan politics lasting over a decade, based on actual data, including facts like running multiple investigations, by their own admission, to harm their political opponents and the unprecedented move of not even allowing a hearing for a Supreme Court nominee, that because that party didn’t have a single vote for impeachment somehow invalidates it, is quite frankly the dumbest fucking thing I’ve heard yet.
Speaking of not acting in good faith.