Don't you think it would be a waste of time for me to try and convince you of something that you are never going to believe? Going by the polls, support for impeachment fell after the evidence was presented. This indicates that the People are not convinced, especially the vanishing few who aren't consumed by party politics. It's not a good look for the Democrat's effort.
How did I fail at reading comprehension of a 1 line post detective sherlock?
Tulsi gave a neutral vote. You wanted a for impeachment vote. Thus, you expected a "you're either for us or against us" vote.
Your partisanship has clouded your judgement young padawan.
You do realize that the concept of "If you're not for us than you're against us" line of thinking is right up there with cult-based thinking, right?
Just making sure you realize it...
Seems to me she has no backbone to take a stand for or against......what a sad president she would make!!
`
Cowardice Under Fire comes to mind.Let me spell it out for you again—the issue is that Gabbard voted “present”. A “yea” OR a “nay” would’ve showed more courage than “present”. She came across as weak, indecisive or indifferent in arguably one of the most historic votes of this decade.
Shocking he doesn't realize that. Shocking.Voting “present” instead of “yea” or “nay” is the polar opposite of independence, fortitude and courage.
Not what people are saying, genius. If she really thinks no then vote no. She is being a coward.You do realize that the concept of "If you're not for us than you're against us" line of thinking is right up there with cult-based thinking, right?
Just making sure you realize it...
Nice retirement bennys after 5 years of serving, at age 62 he'd get $139K/yr. That's pretty damn good for only 5 years of work/service. And most are addicted to the feeling of power.And no other marketable skills either.
What's so great about this job ppl are willing to sell their soul and countrymen out to keep it? :/
Trump’s polling has been fairly stable throughout. Now that he’s impeached and depending on how the game of chicken turns out between Congress and the Senate, those polls might shift. When the media interviews people who are on that fence, “meh” seems to be the response.I'm curious how a person can feel "meh" about the president using the power of his office to influence foreign governments to interfere in the American presidential election. I agree, there is a lot more that could have been included, but I don't see how what was included was insufficient.
ZSo you agree that Tulsi Gabbard is a coward under fire, with no backbone and as such in your eyes would make a great President????Trump’s polling has been fairly stable throughout. Now that he’s impeached and depending on how the game of chicken turns out between Congress and the Senate, those polls might shift. When the media interviews people who are on that fence, “meh” seems to be the response.
Even Yang cautioned the perils of the impeachment process because it places Trump at the center of a contentious narrative, one he might emerge from stronger.
I don’t agree at allZSo you agree that Tulsi Gabbard is a coward under fire, with no backbone and as such in your eyes would make a great President????
How did I fail at reading comprehension of a 1 line post detective sherlock?
Tulsi gave a neutral vote. You wanted a for impeachment vote.
Gabbard: - present
Gabbard's spine and what she stands for - absent
Tulsi after 911 - enlist
Enough said.
It is Shameful that a serving soldier is demeaned this way.
No wonder the population is so polarized.
Tulsi after 911 - enlist
Enough said.
It is Shameful that a serving soldier is demeaned this way.
No wonder the population is so polarized.
But but your criticism of a congressperson who served is somehow more polarizing than the President who attacked a Gold Star family.Damn right a "serving soldier" showing cowardice under fire should be demeaned.
Shame on you for suggesting otherwise..
This is no great mystery. Gabbard is being actively groomed for an independent run by being gaslit into believing she has broad bipartisan support. To preserve that imagined support, she stayed neutral.
How this isn't more than obvious to everyone is beyond me.
hahahahhahahhahaahaaaaaa You posted a funnyeeee!! Rofl!!!Tulsi after 911 - enlist
Enough said.
It is Shameful that a serving soldier is demeaned this way.
No wonder the population is so polarized.
Tulsi after 911 - enlist
Enough said.
It is Shameful that a serving soldier is demeaned this way.
No wonder the population is so polarized.
Tulsi after 911 - enlist
Enough said.
You really think she's going to jump ship and run as an independent? She's polling a solid 1%, I just don't see where she'd get any major support, and the freight train full of cash needed to campaign.This is no great mystery. Gabbard is being actively groomed for an independent run by being gaslit into believing she has broad bipartisan support. To preserve that imagined support, she stayed neutral.
How this isn't more than obvious to everyone is beyond me.