Originally posted by: flexy
Either consider a new PSU with dual rails with TWO 12V rails with *at least* 15A on EACH rail...or a STRONG 20pin PSU with plenty Amps on ONE rail...at least 25A or more !
Not here too...I see the common misconceptions about how big a PSU needs to be are just becoming more and more pervasive. Here are my current system specs:
MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum Mainboard
Athlon64 3000+ (Winchester) @ 2.46 GHz, vcore = 1.40V (+ 6.6% Over VID = 1.492V)
1 GB (2x 512) Corsair XMS PC4000 RAM @ CL2.5-3-4-6-1T, 2.85V, DCDDR528
Gigabyte geforce 6600GT video card w/ 128 MB RAM @ 540 MHz core, 1080 MHz RAM
2x 37 GB SATA 10K RPM WD Raptor HDD's in RAID-0
1x 160 GB WD 7200 RPM PATA HDD
1x 80 GB Maxtor 7200 RPM PATA HDD
NEC 4x DVD +/- R/RW drive
Benq 32X CD-R drive
Generic FDD
D-link DWL-520+ Wireless NIC
SoundBlaster Audigy MP3+
2x 120 mm case fans
...I am powering this on a single-rail Antec TruePower 380W PSU rated for 18A @ +12V, and the system has been rock solid and in near 24/7 operation for a very long time now. Attached to the wall outlet is a watt-meter that I got awhile back because I was tired of having people (not from here) continuously telling me (and other users) that running such a rig on an 18A @ +12V PSU was impossible due to power requirements. At idle, the meter reports a total power drain of only 160 Watts (it's actually slightly less than this, as the meter actually goes to my power strip, which powers some other devices, like my wireless router). During startup and under full load (prime95/gaming/3d benchmarks), the highest reading I've ever been able to obtain was about 230 watts. Note that this is the amount of power coming out of the wall, not how much power is actually being delivered to/demanded by the system. Let's be generous and say that my PSU is 80% efficient (it's actually a bit less than this, so actual system demand will be even less than computed here). This means that at full load, the system is only demanding about 184 watts of power, from *all* rails (3.3V, 5V, and 12V), not just the +12V rail, and clearly even if the demand were on the +12V rail exclusively, the PSU with its 18A @ +12V could still handle it.
Now I don't want to be misconstrued, and I'm certainly not saying that it's a good idea to go out and get some no-name $10 PSU that claims it can do 18A @ +12V or that doing so won't result in a fried MB, but at the same time any quality, name-brand (Antec makes some nice ones, as do OCZ and Enermax, although the latter two have long since jumped on the "let's put an insane amount of amps on the +12V rail because it's what people think they need and they'll pay a premium for it" bandwagon) PSU rated for 18A @ +12V should be adequate to power most systems. If you intend to run a dual-core chip, or 6800 class graphics cards in SLI, then there is justification for upping the recommendation to 24A @ +12V (or dual-rails) or more, but for most systems, 18A is plenty for the time being.