Law and order rhetoric isn’t working. Until there’s a truly horrible case of a MAGA crowd causing death under the word of their orange turd, he’s going to continue to hammer this since it provides a distraction from the pandemic.
It about the only mass distraction tool he has left in his pathetic mind.Law and order rhetoric isn’t working. Until there’s a truly horrible case of a MAGA crowd causing death under the word of their orange turd, he’s going to continue to hammer this since it provides a distraction from the pandemic.
No, he has plenty.It about the only mass distraction tool he has left in his pathetic mind.
The cries of fascism will prove unfounded if his departure from office is uneventful.
You wanna know what the #1 thing people who are simple minded say?They won't. Many people are "simple" and DON'T critically think. That's what got us to this problem in 2016. Some might. Most won't. The margins are to thin to lose ANY.
I prefer brevity and assume to person I am engaging is intelligent enough to understand my intent. You did so in your first paragraph, so my assumption was correct. See, I didn’t need to write a wall of text because you clearly understood what I said.You simply repeated the statement without explaining this.
It could very well be that our system, as much as the GOP has been directly dismantling it, manages to be stronger than the very clear and unmistakable fascist desires of the GOP--again, that is not within question--and so such a vile human that has isolated himself, now, from the military, can be easily removed in our system.
There, I've done more to explain your position than you have attempted. Now, again please tell me how current unmistakable fascism is suddenly "never was fascism!" when it ends at some future time, even if on a whimper?
All I get from you is that you are simply trying to set future you up for a "see! it never was fascism, libtards! I told you then and I am right!"
Playground semantics doesn't really work well with adults. (literate adults, anyway)
I prefer brevity and assume to person I am engaging is intelligent enough to understand my intent. You did so in your first paragraph, so my assumption was correct. See, I didn’t need to write a wall of text because you clearly understood what I said.
As for the rest, I don’t need to “own the libtards”.
Which part did you not understandBrevity or wall of text, you're not really making any kind of coherent point.
Law and order rhetoric isn’t working. Until there’s a truly horrible case of a MAGA crowd causing death under the word of their orange turd, he’s going to continue to hammer this since it provides a distraction from the pandemic.