GigaOM has a good article on it:
Wait on Wink: Fixable flaws in this smart home hub, but a solid user interface on which to build
That's really what it boils down to: fixable flaws. In particular:
1. The app is still dumb. It should
always open to my shortcuts. Right now, if I kill the app, it opens up to whatever I happened to be looking at last. I want a remote control, not something I have to sift through...right now, it adds an extra step to the workflow, which is a big deal because it's not that much harder to stand up & flick the lightswitch off, you know? Workflow is very important. But, the app
has been making improvements, so maybe that's something for the future.
2. The cloud requirement is
nutty. I understand why they do it, but it should have a "backup mode" that, at minimum, allows offline wifi control from your smartphone on the LAN. Or even better, have their own DynDNS-style IP service on a separate server that can still jack you into your system remotely if their cloud is offline. There have been
29 service interruptions in the past 3 months alone (count pulled from their
public status history).
There are some other misc things as well (needs a web GUI so I can control the house when I'm surfing on my computer, and needs a Windows Phone app as a companion to the iOS & Android apps), but
it's all fixable -
if they decide to do it. And if they do, they'll have a very, VERY solid system. The problem is, they don't right now - it has an average 3-star review out of 295 reviews on Amazon. Some examples of the more recent reviews:
December 11th:
THIS PRODUCT SUCKS. OUT OF THE BOX
AS A PROFESSIONAL AUTOMATION SYSTEM INTEGRATOR I FELT COMPELLED TO PURCHASE THE WINK HUB AND TEST OUT IN MY OWN HOME SICCE IT OFFERS VALUE AND WIDE COMPATIBILITY. IF TECHNOLOGY EXISTS ON A DIY PLATFORM , WE ARE NOT THREATENED BECAUSE WE OFFER A SERVICE AND FOR SOME IT STILL REQUIRES A PRO TO DEPLOY EVEN THE SIMPLEST OF PRODUCTS.
HOWEVER, THIS PRODUCT SUCKS. OUT OF THE BOX, EXPECT TO SPEND MUCH TIME. FOR ONE, THE APP STORE FOR APPLE COULDN'T EVEN FIND THE APP. MY ANDROID DID BUT FAILED TO ENROLL THE HUB INTO MY HOME NETWORK. FINALLY AFTER MUCH WASTED TIME, IT APPEARS THAT IF YOU UTILIZE WEP PROTECTION (WHO WOULDN'T) OR USE A 5GHZ (WHO AGAIN) ROUTER, IT ISN'T COMPATIBLE. SO IF YOU GO BACK TO 2001 AND BUY A 2.4 GHZ ROUTER AND DON'T ESCALATE YOUR SECURITY TO WEP, YOU CAN ENROLL THE HUB AND THEN TRUST THIS OPEN LEVEL OF SECURITY WITH DOOR LOCKING AND OTHER SECURITY FEATURES IN YOU HOME.
December 10th:
It's okay as concept if works. but it is not stable and it is unreliable.
After connecting 3 GE lights 2 90W and 1 60W and (3) Kidde Smoke & Carbon Monoxid smoke detector (which you cannot add 3 device seperately), things are getting disconnected.
People are still getting goofed up from the lack of documentation; a recent tech support response illustrates one very simple snag that a lot of people have run into:
On the network side of things, it's highly recommended that the hub live at least 10 feet from your wi-fi router.
There's also a good point about app permissions:
I've been watching the protocol wars among ZigBee, Z-wave and Insteon while looking for an opportunity to transition away from several ancient X-10 devices, so I ordered a Wink hub and 2 GE link 60W equivalent light bulbs. Prior to activating the Wink hub, the topology, privacy and hackability issues of this system became apparent. A complete showstopper in my opinion. I didn't realize that the Wink hub has no local config--it uses the cloud to learn and process everything about your home control, your wireless network (and your behavior). Their cloud is an integral sequential link in all of this. It's also unnerving to be prompted by the Wink App to give permissions to: device & app history, identity, location, phone, photo/media/files, camera/microphone, wifi connection information and Bluetooth connection information. Hey, it's OK.. they're good folks ..and nobody ever gets hacked!
Honestly, there is no way I'm integrating any of my webcams into the system, I have no idea what their backend security policy & data collection and distribution system is like. And then there's just the general complaints:
Poor Quality device. I am on my 3rd hub since it was released. I didn't buy it from Amazon, but from my local home depot. The first hub bricked during a firmware update, the second hub would connect to my wifi but say it was unavailable in the app, and now my third hub (wink support sent me directly) will not stay connected. The app is a great all in one interface, and I will continue to purchase products that support the app; however, I won't buy products that require the wink hub.
Works sporadically. Not user friendly. Basically stopped even trying to work after a day of use.
I understand they pushed the product out to the market to beat the competition, but the onboard firmware is half-baked and that's half of what is killing the reviews. For v2, they definitely need to add an Ethernet port, as well as some paper documentation. I had wireless issues on initial setup myself, and I prefer all of my gear to be wired anyway since I change on my wifi password on a regular basis, so that's kind of a no-brainer. I think I made a list of suggested fixes for Wink earlier in this thread, but as a quick recap:
1. Release an updated version of the Wink Hub with an Ethernet port. Include an Ethernet cable that is labeled "you need to be THIS far away" so that it's clear not to put it next to your router.
2. Include paper document in the box.
3. Add full support for wireless.
4. Add a web GUI.
5. Add a Windows Phone app.
6. Have the smartphone apps default to the user's shortcuts for the homepage.
7. Add offline support. At minimum, just local Wifi LAN support if you're home & your ISP or Wink's Cloud borks. Or add some kind of alternative direct-VPN tunneling for the app to control from home. Because you know what would blow? If your smoke alarm went off, but their service was down & you never got an alert. The cheapest smart fire alarm is $49, so it's not like it's an inexpensive investment like a $10 non-connected model is, and it'd be horrible for something bad to happen, but to miss out on it because their service was down.
Plus there's some other stuff, like enhanced IFTTT & integration, but that stuff can come later. Core thing needs to be a reliability improvement, then we can go from there.