There are a plethora of games I haven't bought, or bought and uninstalled because of mouse issues. That said, I haven't played the game for probably 5 years, I may have noticed it at the time and since forgotten about it, or found a way to fix it for all I know. This was also on Windows XP, never played the game since I installed 7.It is universal. I've had these discussions on other forums. It always starts off with "well I don't have the issue, it must be your system", and ends with them them admitting that they can see the issue on closer inspection, and that they just didn't notice it. It also turns out that it's a known issue with the engine, and present in other games that use it.
There is negative acceleration in the mouse, and mouse sensitivity fluctuates with the framerate.
If you have a high tolerance for crappy mouse input, then by all means play the Witcher. It looked to me like a potentially excellent game. But if you're at all discerning when it comes mouse input, do your sanity a favor and don't bother with it.
I can think of a very good reason not to own the first Witcher: the fact that it's rendered virtually unplayable by it's appalling mouse input. It has possibly the worst negative acceleration of any game I've played.
It is universal. I've had these discussions on other forums. It always starts off with "well I don't have the issue, it must be your system", and ends with them them admitting that they can see the issue on closer inspection, and that they just didn't notice it. It also turns out that it's a known issue with the engine, and present in other games that use it.
There is negative acceleration in the mouse, and mouse sensitivity fluctuates with the framerate.
If you have a high tolerance for crappy mouse input, then by all means play the Witcher. It looked to me like a potentially excellent game. But if you're at all discerning when it comes mouse input, do your sanity a favor and don't bother with it.
This is just another reason why I love CDPR: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2...er&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=socialoomph
You get a DLC, you get DLC and you get a DLC, everybody gets a free DLC.
Free horse armor included. This probably wasn't DLC to begin with but just a stab at the rest of the industry.
Now to contrast it what I saw on Steam mere moments ago:
I've been playing The Witcher 2 in anticipation of number 3. Such a good game.
You've done both paths I take it? I personally prefer Iorveth's path as I think that has a much better story than Vernon's.
A few: http://www.pcgamer.com/the-witcher-3-preview-how-to-build-an-rpg-with-36-endings/Do you guys think there will be a bunch of different paths in the Witcher 3? It seems like it would be a different experience with the whole open world aspect. Sorry if this was answered by the way I didn't read the whole thread.
Ahh, the pressures of a publicly traded company.
You just said a lot in that little sentence.
I pray to God that Steam never goes public.