http://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...eer-shortage/2011/09/01/gIQADpmpuJ_story.html
Some of the stooges on this board too often repeat that we just need to graduate more engineers the US economy would improve. As this Duke professor points out, if there really was a shortage people wouldn't be going into management over engineering. There are some random growth areas but there are always going to be those kinds of discrepancies in a market economy. In another decade that market could easily be saturated.
I don't care if they pay full tuition. We need to educate Americans before foreigners. Many of these foreigners aren't even staying in the US anymore.
I'd like to think he's right here but I think part of this is wishful thinking. And I think the advantages we have in terms of creativity are being thrown away by most schools' preferences for cookie-cutter test takers. I'm guessing Einstein didn't have a tiger mom telling him he had to become an engineer when he was little. Like many great Western scientists a free society allowed him to choose a field he was particularly adept in. These days if you aren't willing to compete with desperate third-worlders in rote and repetitive mathematics before you even get admitted to a pHd program, the same opportunities might not be available to you.
Salaries are the best indicator of shortages. In most engineering professions, salaries have not increased more than inflation over the past two decades. But in some specialized fields of software engineering in Silicon Valley and in professions such as petroleum engineering, there have been huge spikes. The short answer is that there are shortages in specific fields and in specific regions, but not overall. Graduating more of the wrong types of engineers is likely to increase unemployment rather than create jobs.
Some of the stooges on this board too often repeat that we just need to graduate more engineers the US economy would improve. As this Duke professor points out, if there really was a shortage people wouldn't be going into management over engineering. There are some random growth areas but there are always going to be those kinds of discrepancies in a market economy. In another decade that market could easily be saturated.
As a result, nearly 54 percent of our PhDs in engineering and 42 percent of our master’s degrees go to foreign nationals. So, even if we increase U.S. university enrollments, the majority of these students will benefit our global competitors.
I don't care if they pay full tuition. We need to educate Americans before foreigners. Many of these foreigners aren't even staying in the US anymore.
Instead of trying to compete with India and China on their graduation numbers, let’s focus, instead, on our core strength: Our engineers can think outside the box. Unlike the graduates of Chinese and Indian universities, U.S.-educated engineers learn a broad variety of skills, including strong interpersonal skills and an understanding of customers and markets — and, most importantly, they can innovate.
I'd like to think he's right here but I think part of this is wishful thinking. And I think the advantages we have in terms of creativity are being thrown away by most schools' preferences for cookie-cutter test takers. I'm guessing Einstein didn't have a tiger mom telling him he had to become an engineer when he was little. Like many great Western scientists a free society allowed him to choose a field he was particularly adept in. These days if you aren't willing to compete with desperate third-worlders in rote and repetitive mathematics before you even get admitted to a pHd program, the same opportunities might not be available to you.