UglyCasanova
Lifer
- Mar 25, 2001
- 19,275
- 1,361
- 126
Would you like to prevent assholes from wrecking shit or would you not?
Of course, but I'm not giving up my right to privacy either.
Would you like to prevent assholes from wrecking shit or would you not?
Of course, but I'm not giving up my right to privacy either.
Good luck with that.
No kidding. So judging from your posts you support the NSA and Patriot Act and the like?
Indeed. The ideology of May&co (that their administration should censor Internet) should not be allowed to breed unquestioned?We cannot allow this ideology the safe space it needs to breed
They are a necessity at this time. Especially in Britain and most of Europe where there has been an increase in terrorist incidents.
Nope. And fuck you. You are the problem.They are a necessity at this time. Especially in Britain and most of Europe where there has been an increase in terrorist incidents.
Sorry bro, but all the surveillance in the world won't prevent this shit. These guys could have met, orchestrated and committed these acts without ever touching a computer or phone.
Sorry bro, but all the surveillance in the world won't prevent this shit. These guys could have met, orchestrated and committed these acts without ever touching a computer or phone.
http://money.cnn.com/2017/06/04/technology/social-media-terrorism-extremism-london/index.html
sadly, free speech is a bitch. trying to regulate internet speech is simply a game of whackamole as everyone here well knows, and it plays right into the hands of becoming the very thing that you're supposedly trying to avoid by being democratic - authoritarianism.
after all, what speech is extremist? anything the government doesn't like?
Doesn't really matter. All our current surveillance obviously wasn't enough. This is all about trade offs. How much freedom are we willing to give up in order to prevent some incidents, because we cannot prevent them all. Sure, it sucks when something horrible like this happens, but that is the price of true freedom. Every time we surrender more freedom, the terrorists win a little bit more.You are correct, they could have, but did they? Seems unlikely that they never did.
Doesn't really matter. All our current surveillance obviously wasn't enough. This is all about trade offs. How much freedom are we willing to give up in order to prevent some incidents, because we cannot prevent them all. Sure, it sucks when something horrible like this happens, but that is the price of true freedom. Every time we surrender more freedom, the terrorists win a little bit more.
Nope. And fuck you. You are the problem.
Impale your anus on a bottle of vodka, sputnik.I am not swayed by your well reasoned and logical argument.
Impale your anus on a bottle of vodka, sputnik.
Nope, this is similar to 9/11. You know, the war that was used to justify America's conquering of the Middle East for WMDs - attacking countries that had nothing to do with 9/11.Really she has no better ideas to protect her country? She should resign then.
Impale your anus on a bottle of vodka, sputnik.
They collect data on all of us but they can't go through all that data for everyone. Once someone does something though, they can mine the data for anything they want to know. Believe me, if you ever committed an act like this, agents would be talking to every person you ever had contact with and watching archived video of every time you masturbated to internet porn in front of your webcam.Obviously they already knew about these people. How else could they have tracked down and arrested more than 10 suspects / associates in less than 24 hours after the attack. Seems strange to me.