- Jul 21, 2001
- 21,059
- 3
- 0
is there a noticeable difference between these two heatsinks, as far as performance?
right now i have an Epox 8RDA+ w/ Athlon XP 2100+ (stock speeds) and an Arctic Cooling Copper Silent TC. my idle temps are about 48C-50C.......a tad high for my liking.
i have a Zalman 92mm fan that pushes more air and is quieter than the fan on the Arctic cooler. It has a bracket that allows me to position the fan right above the heatsink, so the fact that the SLK-800 can't support it doesn't really matter. (i.e. if i get the SLK-900, i'll mount the 92mm Zalman fan directly on the heatsink, but if i get the SLK-800 i can use the bracket and position the fan right over the heatsink.......does this make sense? )
so, my question is, is the SLK-900 worth the extra money?
right now i have an Epox 8RDA+ w/ Athlon XP 2100+ (stock speeds) and an Arctic Cooling Copper Silent TC. my idle temps are about 48C-50C.......a tad high for my liking.
i have a Zalman 92mm fan that pushes more air and is quieter than the fan on the Arctic cooler. It has a bracket that allows me to position the fan right above the heatsink, so the fact that the SLK-800 can't support it doesn't really matter. (i.e. if i get the SLK-900, i'll mount the 92mm Zalman fan directly on the heatsink, but if i get the SLK-800 i can use the bracket and position the fan right over the heatsink.......does this make sense? )
so, my question is, is the SLK-900 worth the extra money?