Originally posted by: cyburzaki
Originally posted by: continuum
...the OCZ Vindicator that was just reviewed @ Anandtech, it looks decent-- but I'm surprised the reviewer didn't take SilenX's fan specs with a large grain of salt.
I had the exact same reaction. This quote:
- The SilenX IXTREMA 120 claims to provide the world's best noise-to-airflow ratio. The specifications certainly support that claim with an exceptional 14 dB-A noise level coupled with 72 CFM airflow.
is nothing more than a meaningless circularity. The specs are being cited as support of SilenX's claim that the fan has the "world's best noise-to-airflow ratio," when in reality it is the specs themselves that constitute the claim, and those go unchallenged by the reviewer.
I read that review, too, and what was written and had to laugh out loud. There is no possible way a fan can move 72CFM and maintain a <14dBA rating. Of course, you have to understand how SilenX actually measures and completely fudges their rating for sound production.
I guess it'd be easy for almost any half-decent fan to achieve a 14dBA rating if you tested like SilenX does........measuring sound production at ONE METER from the fan, measuring sound on three axes and then taking the mean of those three readings. Taking dBA reading at a yard from the fan.....sheesh!!!
So, if your frontal reading produced a 30dBA reading, but your two off-axis side readings read 10dBA, guess that's give you close to your 14dBA....and then it all depends upon what speed the rating is taken at, too. A lot of shady dBA ratings of fans, SilenX at the forefront, rate the CFM at max speed but get their dBA rating at the fan's slowest speed it can run.
And all the "reviewer" had to do was type SilenX into Google and he'd have seen a lot more about the bogus claims of their dBA ratings than anything else. I've seen testing done on those fans and they all seem to produce around 32dBA, nowhere near the 14 they claim.
But, that's not why I'm posting. I cannot figure out what the problem is with the BIOS settings question. The whole point of Speedstep, Quiet and Cool, C1E and all the rest is to throttle the cpu's speed at IDLE.......but allow the cpu to run full speed under LOAD. Therefore, during the load testing, there is no throttling of the cpu's speed....it's working at 100% and stays that way until the 100% load is removed. As long as the load is present, the throttle function is disabled completely....so the point that hox was trying to make is ridiculous and pointless in the least.