- Oct 4, 2006
- 2,779
- 1
- 81
ok sue me :whiste:Yes, you are complaining. If it were the release candidates then your point is valid. However, it's beta software so it's development can be faster.
ok sue me :whiste:Yes, you are complaining. If it were the release candidates then your point is valid. However, it's beta software so it's development can be faster.
All these beta updates will get rolled into a final update which will be pushed out to consumers.oh no, that's the whole reason I switched to Pale Moon, far more stable releases but they keeup with the security updates
at the end of the day, all these Firefox updates bring nothing to the end user but headaches especially with AV plugins not working anymore due to the rapid updates, example: Kaspersky Internet Security addons never seem to catch up with FF's updates, not their fault, it's simply impossible to catch up this way ,it's a joke
Other vendors of 3rd party software aren't going to update their code until a Final build is released.
Which is exactly what ESR builds are. Stable builds with security updates only.oh no, that's the whole reason I switched to Pale Moon, far more stable releases but they keeup with the security updates
True, by the time they finished updating their code, guess what? that FF version is already obsolete and once the end users update their firefox the add-ons are incompatible again
just take a look at the Kaspsersky forums they're full of this complaint but Kaspersky can't help it and can't catch up no more
All Mozilla cares about now is to reach version 30 in no time
version 30 of a program? lol, that's a joke really
look at IE, after all these years, they're on version 11, that's how it should be IMO
In the past, when you updated from version 3 to 4 for example, you felt it was a new browser, not its just a new number, and the interface gets uglier and uglier
just my 2 cents worth
True, by the time they finished updating their code, guess what? that FF version is already obsolete and once the end users update their firefox the add-ons are incompatible again
just take a look at the Kaspsersky forums they're full of this complaint but Kaspersky can't help it and can't catch up no more
All Mozilla cares about now is to reach version 30 in no time
version 30 of a program? lol, that's a joke really
look at IE, after all these years, they're on version 11, that's how it should be IMO
In the past, when you updated from version 3 to 4 for example, you felt it was a new browser, not its just a new number, and the interface gets uglier and uglier
just my 2 cents worth
True, by the time they finished updating their code, guess what? that FF version is already obsolete and once the end users update their firefox the add-ons are incompatible again
just take a look at the Kaspsersky forums they're full of this complaint but Kaspersky can't help it and can't catch up no more
All Mozilla cares about now is to reach version 30 in no time
version 30 of a program? lol, that's a joke really
look at IE, after all these years, they're on version 11, that's how it should be IMO
In the past, when you updated from version 3 to 4 for example, you felt it was a new browser, not its just a new number, and the interface gets uglier and uglier
just my 2 cents worth
iz yer r trolling no?
I concur. Updates are too frequent. I turned off Firefox's update check. Now it only looks when I tell it to. I'm on the release channel, BTW.
I've been skipping versions - I just don't feel like a whole new browser every month. If they incremented FF version by decimal places rather than whole numbers, I'd probably update regularly. Put that in your pipe and smoke it, Mozilla.
I'm on 21 now. Before that it was 18.
thanks the lord! someone agrees with me! glad not everyone is a Mozilla fanboy here on these forums
I really like FF on my Linux machine. It just works. The distro I chose came packaged with Chromium but after awhile I had to ditch it and go with FF.Just disable auto updates. Once in a while run one manually. That's what I do. In fact in Linux it's actually better since it's part of the general system updates so instead of updating all these apps separately I just run a full system update every now and then.
thanks the lord! someone agrees with me! glad not everyone is a Mozilla fanboy here on these forums
You know you could just edit the install.rdf file, present in every extension, or better still get an ESR version which doesn't update that often btw is it just me or does every other thread you create blames someone like a Mozilla/Google/M$ et al in one way or another for apparently no damn good reason :hmm:True, by the time they finished updating their code, guess what? that FF version is already obsolete and once the end users update their firefox the add-ons are incompatible again
just take a look at the Kaspsersky forums they're full of this complaint but Kaspersky can't help it and can't catch up no more
All Mozilla cares about now is to reach version 30 in no time
version 30 of a program? lol, that's a joke really
look at IE, after all these years, they're on version 11, that's how it should be IMO
In the past, when you updated from version 3 to 4 for example, you felt it was a new browser, not its just a new number, and the interface gets uglier and uglier
just my 2 cents worth