Things I don't want to see in Star Wars: Episode VII

[UberNeuman]

\feel free to add yours....

 

[Exterous]

They cannot do any more harm to it than Lucas himself already has.

Well now you are just asking for trouble

 

[Sho'Nuff]

 

[UberNeuman]

They cannot do any more harm to it than Lucas himself already has.

Disney has a history of cranking out shit loads that could fill a landfill....

 

[Pocatello]

They cannot do any more harm to it than Lucas himself already has.

True. Still shivered from the thought of Episode I, II, III. I still can't believe they edited Hayden Christensen into Episode 6.

 

[Triumph]

i agree that they can't make it much worse than what lucas did to it.

 

[zinfamous]

Disney has a history of cranking out shit loads that could fill a landfill....

actually....not really.

 

[Pheran]

Best quote I've seen on this: "Worrying that Disney will ruin Star Wars is like worrying that a second iceberg will dive down to hit the Titanic."

 

[Jeff7]

We need more prequels, and especially one that shows Jar-Jar at the same annoying age as Anakin in Episode I. That's when we'll also learn about how he had a stroke, which severely impacted his speech and intelligence, and also of the effect this had on his parents. Deysa bein' sooooo devastated.

And be sure to shoehorn Chewie and Yoda in there too, and maybe show an engineer's conceptual drawing of a design for R2-D2.

 

[UberNeuman]

My new hope is that this creative team will strike back against the empire of weak Star Wars EU and herald the return of the Jedi...

\yet the menace of age old phantoms remain...

 

[UberNeuman]

Poke my eyes out now...

 

[Baked]

gay


Poke my eyes out now...

I will buy an army to attack the disney castle if that thing happens in a SW movie.

 

[GagHalfrunt]

Trick question. I won't see anything they do to Star Wars, George Lucas can't be trusted. Why would I give him another chance to show me another shitty movie? Fool me once shame on you, fool me four times shame on me.

 

[UberNeuman]

Trick question. I won't see anything they do to Star Wars, George Lucas can't be trusted. Why would I give him another chance to show me another shitty movie? Fool me once shame on you, fool me four times shame on me.

Mr. Lucas has put himself out of the loop - it's Disney's bane to bare.....

 

[DAGTA]

poke my eyes out now...

you go too far!!!

 

[zinfamous]

Mr. Lucas has put himself out of the loop - it's Disney's bane to bare.....

oh, he's still there.

limited capacity, but his treatment is what will be filmed.

If they are sticking to the current 2015 time frame, it is Lucas's concept that is being produced.

....not a bad thing, of course. Just need some people with talent to bring the good out of his ideas.

Stephen king is this way: shitty writer, shitty everything--besides his ideas. Put someone competent in charge of his ideas, good stuff happens.

:thumbsup:

 

[Vic Vega]

I always got the impression Jar Jar and the Gungans were supposed to be Jamaican?

Also, I see Disney has wasted no time combing Wikipedia and adding themselves as "owners" of Star Wars.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jar_Jar_Binks

Jar Jar Binks is a fictional character from Disney's Star Wars Saga (appears in: Episode I: The Phantom Menace, Episode II: Attack of the Clones, Episode III: Revenge of the Sith), and the television series Star Wars: The Clone Wars.[1] His primary role was to provide comic relief, but many reacted negatively to his character upon his debut. Jar Jar was voiced by Ahmed Best, and was almost completely computer generated.

 

[zinfamous]

^lmao

 

[eits]

i think they have a chance at doing it justice. i don't think they're interested in screwing the pooch with this franchise and, i think, they want to restore the storyline's integrity and take the credit for doing so.

the ONLY thing that gives me hope when it comes to star wars in disney's hands is "tron: legacy". "tron: legacy" was so good, it was easily rewatchable, which is quite an accomplishment for me. there's a short list of movies that i'll actually WANT watch more than once.

 

[Monster_Munch]

I liked Tron Legacy, but have you seen John Carter? That was made by Disney and it was seriously bad. Basically unwatchable.

 

[eits]

I liked Tron Legacy, but have you seen John Carter? That was made by Disney and it was seriously bad. Basically unwatchable.

never heard of 'john carter'... was it a sequel to something?

 

[Monster_Munch]

never heard of 'john carter'... was it a sequel to something?

http://imdb.com/title/tt0401729/

It's a Disney sci-fi movie that came out near the beginning of 2012. Generally considered to be a huge flop.

 

[eits]

http://imdb.com/title/tt0401729/

It's a Disney sci-fi movie that came out near the beginning of 2012. Generally considered to be a huge flop.

... was it a sequel to something? honestly, it doesn't matter to me if disney made a flop sci-fi flick. what matters to me is how good prequels and sequels are in comparison to the original.

tron's sequel was awesome. i'm hoping 'the trilogy's' sequel will be awesome, too.

 

[dawp]

... was it a sequel to something? honestly, it doesn't matter to me if disney made a flop sci-fi flick. what matters to me is how good prequels and sequels are in comparison to the original.

tron's sequel was awesome. i'm hoping 'the trilogy's' sequel will be awesome, too.

this what the John Carter flick was based on

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Carter_of_Mars

A classic book character by Edgar Rice Burroughs

 

[eits]

this what the John Carter flick was based on

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Carter_of_Mars

A classic book character by Edgar Rice Burroughs

sooo...

who cares?

like i said, unless it's a sequel or prequel to an awesome movie, i don't care how bad this 'john carter' movie flopped (even though i don't really consider a 7/10 a flop... although, the story sounds super lame).