This is the most anti-bush/liberal forum I have ever seen...

[Pabster]

Originally posted by: Bowfinger
You'll probably have to spell it out for Pabsie. He's proven time and again he's not the sharpest knife in the drawer. (Which would be perfectly OK if he didn't try so hard to pretend otherwise.)

And, once again, you've proven that you have no argument. You just like to come in and troll threads with little kiddie responses that (apparently) receive "High-Fives" from your little friends.

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: Pabster
I will agree that the concentration of certain groups is higher here.

Namely, the Blame America First crowd.

Get your facts straight. We're not blaming America, we're blaming Bush.

And you're blaming America for blaming Bush.

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: Pabster

Originally posted by: Gaard
It doesn't mean they bash him like the idiots on this forum. Anyone who calls the President "chimp" or some such slur loses any credence I'd give to their opinions.

Why? Would you prefer they call him an 'idiot'? Then would you give their opinions credence?

Anyone who has to resort to such debauchery only serves to prove the point being made.

Contrary to popular belief, it is possible to make a point without denegrating a person with first-grade slurs like "chimp".[/quote]

So you Bushies are guilty as well for your "debauchery" of President Clinton, right?

Is it possible to make a point without denegrating a person with slurs about blow-jobs and stained dresses? Especially when that person most often isn't even the subject of the thread?

 

[Bowfinger]

Originally posted by: Pabster

Originally posted by: Bowfinger
You'll probably have to spell it out for Pabsie. He's proven time and again he's not the sharpest knife in the drawer. (Which would be perfectly OK if he didn't try so hard to pretend otherwise.)

And, once again, you've proven that you have no argument. You just like to come in and troll threads with little kiddie responses that (apparently) receive "High-Fives" from your little friends.

Sorry, Pabsie, I'm confused. I have "no argument" about what, exactly?

Looks to me like your comment is a non sequitur, a knee-jerk lash back at me for pointing out you're looking foolish again. While your emotional reaction is predictable, you need to recognize that you're shooting the messenger. The solution to your problem is to stop spouting foolish nonsense.

 

[junitjam123]

quote taken form family guy

Over? What are you talking about? What kind of talk is that? It's un-American. Did George W. Bush quit even after losing the popular vote? No! Did he quit after losing millions of dollars of his father's money in failed oil companies? No! Did he quit after knocking that girl up? No! Did he quit after he got that DUI? No! Did he quit after he got busted for drunk and disorderly conduct at a football game? No! Did he quit...

 

[jpeyton]

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Pabster
I will agree that the concentration of certain groups is higher here.

Namely, the Blame America First crowd.

Get your facts straight. We're not blaming America, we're blaming Bush.

And you're blaming America for blaming Bush.

Good call.

 

[busmaster11]

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: busmaster11
Hmmm... I coulda swore it was you who took it in a different direction by calling me a hypocrite. All I did was agree with bumrush99 and said I was a Christian.

The people viewing this thread are still waiting for you to answer charges and defend your accusation by the way. But don't bother. We now know better than to expect anything remotely intelligent in response. You're fodder for liberals. We need Cad back for this to be fair again...

You just cant let it go can you? So "humble" yet has to get the last word in. Wow. And you were the one who took it in a different direction and you ARE a hypocrite. You say you dont vote republican because you dont want to judge anyone, yet you have constantly judged ME throughout this entir thread. So yes, you are a hypocrite. And now you say I have no intelligence either. Thanks! Just shows how much more of a hypocrite you really are. Mr. I love everyone, except for those who differ in oppinion. Sheesh what a guy!

Haha that would be so true if it were not for the fact that you've proven to all the witnesses here that you have this wonderful ability to ignore all the facts and arguments in order to troll.

I press you on this because you involved the Bible, and you interpret differently than I. Yeah I'm not perfect, and I can be a hypocrite. Ideologues who are as incapable of backing up their arguments really brings out the worst in me.

 

[busmaster11]

Originally posted by: Pabster
I will agree that the concentration of certain groups is higher here.

Namely, the Blame America First crowd.

I don't remember where the quote is from, but it was said that liberals love America like mature adults. We believe in constructive criticism, accountability, and pointing out flaws to make it better.

Conservatives love America like children - How dare you blame mommy!!! Mommy's perfect!!!


Personally I'm disappointed that so many of us grew up in environments where we were never taught to look to ourselves first, and fix our internal flaws before accusing others.

And Corbett, if you're reading this, keep in mind everyone else here thinks you're a troll too, and the evidence is plentiful, so its not like I need to go out on a limb here to judge you.

 

[eits]

Originally posted by: Juliasmama


Why people who are anti-bush automatically are categorized in the liberal category??

NO KIDDING!

 

[Bowfinger]

Originally posted by: busmaster11

Originally posted by: Pabster
I will agree that the concentration of certain groups is higher here.

Namely, the Blame America First crowd.

I don't remember where the quote is from, but it was said that liberals love America like mature adults. We believe in constructive criticism, accountability, and pointing out flaws to make it better.

Conservatives love America like children - How dare you blame mommy!!! Mommy's perfect!!! ...

I've seen a similar comment, and I think there's a certain amount of truth to it. In general, conservatives tend to see any criticism of America as an attack rather than an opportunity to reflect and perhaps improve. I assume that's related to their tendency to see things in black and white.


edit: typo

 

[Polish3d]

Originally posted by: Gaard

Originally posted by: Frackal

Originally posted by: jpeyton

Originally posted by: Corbett
What's with the constant Bush bashing here? I mean, I love talking politics and all but most of you just seem to hate absolutely ANYTHING that has to do with the White House or this current administration. Why?

Bush's approval rating is in the 30's. That means over 60% of the country "Bush bashes".

Of course, you'll find a higher concentration in this forum because the typical member has a higher IQ than the US average.

It doesn't mean they bash him like the idiots on this forum. Anyone who calls the President "chimp" or some such slur loses any credence I'd give to their opinions.

Why? Would you prefer they call him an 'idiot'? Then would you give their opinions credence?

You didn't quite get the point in your eagerness to poke fun.

I don't mind if people call Bush an idiot, that is a characterization of him based upon his thinking or his actions.

But when people call him "chimpy" or anything related primarily to his appearance it is to me, extremely immature.

It would be like calling someone "dumbo ears" or "four eyes." It's immature and unrelated to his actions as president. It indicates something about a person when they make such comments.

You may have a different standard and find this one to be "idiotic." Does not matter as I'm only speaking for myself here.

 

[Moonbeam]

Originally posted by: Frackal

Originally posted by: Gaard

Originally posted by: Frackal

Originally posted by: jpeyton

Originally posted by: Corbett
What's with the constant Bush bashing here? I mean, I love talking politics and all but most of you just seem to hate absolutely ANYTHING that has to do with the White House or this current administration. Why?

Bush's approval rating is in the 30's. That means over 60% of the country "Bush bashes".

Of course, you'll find a higher concentration in this forum because the typical member has a higher IQ than the US average.

It doesn't mean they bash him like the idiots on this forum. Anyone who calls the President "chimp" or some such slur loses any credence I'd give to their opinions.

Why? Would you prefer they call him an 'idiot'? Then would you give their opinions credence?

You didn't quite get the point in your eagerness to poke fun.

I don't mind if people call Bush an idiot, that is a characterization of him based upon his thinking or his actions.

But when people call him "chimpy" or anything related primarily to his appearance it is to me, extremely immature.

It would be like calling someone "dumbo ears" or "four eyes." It's immature and unrelated to his actions as president. It indicates something about a person when they make such comments.

You may have a different standard and find this one to be "idiotic." Does not matter as I'm only speaking for myself here.

But Bush is immature. Which one of his guys does he call The Turd?

 

[Polish3d]

Your comment is not relevant to the point in my post

 

[busmaster11]

Originally posted by: Moonbeam

Originally posted by: Frackal

Originally posted by: Gaard

Originally posted by: Frackal

Originally posted by: jpeyton

Originally posted by: Corbett
What's with the constant Bush bashing here? I mean, I love talking politics and all but most of you just seem to hate absolutely ANYTHING that has to do with the White House or this current administration. Why?

Bush's approval rating is in the 30's. That means over 60% of the country "Bush bashes".

Of course, you'll find a higher concentration in this forum because the typical member has a higher IQ than the US average.

It doesn't mean they bash him like the idiots on this forum. Anyone who calls the President "chimp" or some such slur loses any credence I'd give to their opinions.

Why? Would you prefer they call him an 'idiot'? Then would you give their opinions credence?

You didn't quite get the point in your eagerness to poke fun.

I don't mind if people call Bush an idiot, that is a characterization of him based upon his thinking or his actions.

But when people call him "chimpy" or anything related primarily to his appearance it is to me, extremely immature.

It would be like calling someone "dumbo ears" or "four eyes." It's immature and unrelated to his actions as president. It indicates something about a person when they make such comments.

You may have a different standard and find this one to be "idiotic." Does not matter as I'm only speaking for myself here.

But Bush is immature. Which one of his guys does he call The Turd?

That'd be rove, the turd blossom... It's actually the name of a flower in Texas...

 

[Pabster]

Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Looks to me like your comment is a non sequitur, a knee-jerk lash back at me for pointing out you're looking foolish again. While your emotional reaction is predictable, you need to recognize that you're shooting the messenger. The solution to your problem is to stop spouting foolish nonsense.

You should quit trying to use cliche phrases you don't even comprehend.

You've contributed absolutely nothing to this thread but insults, as usual. THAT is the "foolishness" that everyone sees.

 

[wchou]

Originally posted by: jpeyton

Originally posted by: Corbett
What's with the constant Bush bashing here? I mean, I love talking politics and all but most of you just seem to hate absolutely ANYTHING that has to do with the White House or this current administration. Why?

Bush's approval rating is in the 30's. That means over 60% of the country "Bush bashes".

Of course, you'll find a higher concentration in this forum because the typical member has a higher IQ than the US average.

I agree. It's like evolution vs creation, I'll take my chance on evolution. While the rest lives in fantasy where they see everything in black and white, I'd prefer to base my belief on factual information. It's useless arguing with people who are out of touch with reality.

 

[Bowfinger]

Originally posted by: Pabster

Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Looks to me like your comment is a non sequitur, a knee-jerk lash back at me for pointing out you're looking foolish again. While your emotional reaction is predictable, you need to recognize that you're shooting the messenger. The solution to your problem is to stop spouting foolish nonsense.

You should quit trying to use cliche phrases you don't even comprehend.

Well Pabsie, I see you're evading my previous question, even deleting it from my quote. Rather dishonest of you, but certainly not surprising. Let's see if you have the character to answer this one: exactly what "cliche phrases" did I use but not comprehend?

See, my theory is you're just squawking out your butt -- again -- and you will slink away from defending your new BS attack just like you have all your others. You will, however, reply with yet another duhversionary attack, hoping no one else will notice your lameness. Hint: it's not working.

You've contributed absolutely nothing to this thread but insults, as usual. THAT is the "foolishness" that everyone sees.

ROFL! That's especially funny coming from you. Perhaps "contribute" and "nothing ... but insults" are other terms you do not understand, just like "debauchery". By the way, do you still think GWB looks awfully young for a 250 year old man, what with him being the latest in a line of Presidents dating back to the foundations of the U.S. and all?

:laugh:

 

[Pabster]

Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Well Pabsie, I see you're evading my previous question, even deleting it from my quote. Rather dishonest of you, but certainly not surprising. Let's see if you have the character to answer this one: exactly what "cliche phrases" did I use but not comprehend?

I often remove garbage for brevity.

The original post you responded to with your "non sequitir" cliche was about Frackal's comment:

"It doesn't mean they bash him like the idiots on this forum. Anyone who calls the President "chimp" or some such slur loses any credence I'd give to their opinions."[/quote]

You provided absolutely no reply, just your usual insults and kiddie garbage. You might do well to look up the definition of that phrase and then tell me exactly how you can use it when you have no argument against the premises presented.

See, my theory is you're just squawking out your butt -- again -- and you will slink away from defending your new BS attack just like you have all your others. You will, however, reply with yet another duhversionary attack, hoping no one else will notice your lameness. Hint: it's not working.

Slink away? Ah, like you always do when facts and evidence are presented.

ROFL! That's especially funny coming from you. Perhaps "contribute" and "nothing ... but insults" are other terms you do not understand, just like "debauchery". By the way, do you still think GWB looks awfully young for a 250 year old man, what with him being the latest in a line of Presidents dating back to the foundations of the U.S. and all?:laugh:

Another obfuscation attempt duly noted.

 

[Bowfinger]

Taken to PM. I'm comfortable everyone except Pabsie gets it already.

 

[Stretchman]

Originally posted by: ZeGermans
Because he's quite possibly the worst president in history?

Lol...very true.

 

[replicator]

I've yet to see a tech forum - actually any forum online - that is pro-bush.

No surprise to me...

 

[eits]

Originally posted by: Frackal

Originally posted by: Gaard

Originally posted by: Frackal

Originally posted by: jpeyton

Originally posted by: Corbett
What's with the constant Bush bashing here? I mean, I love talking politics and all but most of you just seem to hate absolutely ANYTHING that has to do with the White House or this current administration. Why?

Bush's approval rating is in the 30's. That means over 60% of the country "Bush bashes".

Of course, you'll find a higher concentration in this forum because the typical member has a higher IQ than the US average.

It doesn't mean they bash him like the idiots on this forum. Anyone who calls the President "chimp" or some such slur loses any credence I'd give to their opinions.

Why? Would you prefer they call him an 'idiot'? Then would you give their opinions credence?

You didn't quite get the point in your eagerness to poke fun.

I don't mind if people call Bush an idiot, that is a characterization of him based upon his thinking or his actions.

But when people call him "chimpy" or anything related primarily to his appearance it is to me, extremely immature.

It would be like calling someone "dumbo ears" or "four eyes." It's immature and unrelated to his actions as president. It indicates something about a person when they make such comments.

You may have a different standard and find this one to be "idiotic." Does not matter as I'm only speaking for myself here.

for a guy pretending to be so educated, you've got terrible punctuation.

 

[Scorpion]

Originally posted by: replicator
I've yet to see a tech forum - actually any forum online - that is pro-bush.

No surprise to me...

I've generally found that more intelligent people tend to disagree with Bush and his administration. The only really smart person I know that really defends Bush is also being investigated by the FBI for being busted with a huge amount of illegal software, music, games, etc. Quite ironic...

 

[Corbett]

Originally posted by: Scorpion

Originally posted by: replicator
I've yet to see a tech forum - actually any forum online - that is pro-bush.

No surprise to me...

I've generally found that more intelligent people tend to disagree with Bush and his administration. The only really smart person I know that really defends Bush is also being investigated by the FBI for being busted with a huge amount of illegal software, music, games, etc. Quite ironic...

A perfect example of the leftist elitist attitude!

 

[Corbett]

Originally posted by: busmaster11
Haha that would be so true if it were not for the fact that you've proven to all the witnesses here that you have this wonderful ability to ignore all the facts and arguments in order to troll.

I've been too busy puting you in your place to answer anything else. Besides, this thread was about how this forum is full of hate-Bush liberals and you and others have proven. So really, you are the one who is trolling.

Originally posted by: busmaster11
I press you on this because you involved the Bible, and you interpret differently than I. Yeah I'm not perfect, and I can be a hypocrite. Ideologues who are as incapable of backing up their arguments really brings out the worst in me.

Call me an idealogue all you want but I get those principles from the Bible. If they weren't in there I wouldn't have a problem with it. We can go on an on, or you can stop anytime now. If I cared what other people on this forum thought of my I would be a neocon bashing liberal who hates when others disagree with him, but you already have that covered.