I imagine you have a list of specific regulations that can be eliminated without being detrimental to public health and/or safety.
No, why would I have that specific list? Are you confusing me with the next president or one of his appointees?
I really don't understand you. You appear giddy with the prospect that we open our corporations to pollute the water and air. Was this really where Trump got his support from.... by people upset that our water/air were too clean? That is a thing?
Not sure where you got that delusional idea. Saying there is a happy medium between overregulation and no regulation somehow sounds like "giddy with the prospect that we open our corporations to pollute the water and air" to you?
Don't get too excited though. You only got half of the the field covered, there is still NIMBYISM to overcome. That will require changes to the tort system to prevent the people directly harmed by the increased pollution from suing EVEN though the published science can prove the harm. I imagine that you are completely down with that as well and we all should expect and support a Trump assault on the tort system to fully allow corporations to pollute without consequence.
You said it correctly "I imagine". That's your imagination at work, no idea where that drivel comes from, it's certainly not something I'm looking for.
I just can't comprehend your mindset as you are not a corporate master. You want society and the environment harmed so corporate scum can make bigger profits? Why?
Can you point to where exactly I said I want society and the environment harmed?