Watchtower magazine, isn't that the magazine that Jehovahs witnesses give out? Where and who did they get the quote from. What is the context of the quote?
Watchtower magazine, isn't that the magazine that Jehovahs witnesses give out? Where and who did they get the quote from. What is the context of the quote?
http://www.watchtower.org/
Jehovahs witnesses. A sect that seem to have originated from anglicanism and the old church of Britain.
Jesus Christ where the hell are the goddamn mods here?
Soooooo, the lock didnt hold?
Umm, no. The Jehovah's Witness church was formed from a bible study group in america. It had very little to do with the church of england. Hell, it has very little to do with ANY church.
Where did you even get that it had an Anglicanism link?
Forget the evolution crap, I want to hear about the bridge.boring...
Explaining Evolution to a creationist is is more of a waste of time than trying to explain your pet the new sandy bridge architecture.
Forget the evolution crap, I want to hear about the bridge.
Forget the evolution crap, I want to hear about the bridge.
Everybody knows an invisible and undetectable Flying Spaghetti Monster created the universe after a night of heavy drinking
This is plausible.
Especially since there is evidence!!!!! The original Pastafarians, the pirates, have had their numbers in steady and heavy decline since the 1850s or so. All along that timeline, global warming has been increasing....
One atheist biology scientist said something in a 1990's copy of the Watchtower Magazine that should silence the most ardent and fanatical evolutionist. This is what he said;
This thread is to Highly Technical as the OP is to Mensa.
Hence the thread has been moved to OT
-Admin DrPizza
Your post is nonsensical rambling based on ignorance. If you want to have a real discussion, post something definitive. Are you arguing the case against abiogenesis or against evolution by natural selection? They are two completely separate topics which you conflate, again, out of ignorance.
First, if you have pontificated on so many worldly beauties you should also know of one called a SPELL CHECKER.
Use it.
Second, your grammar is horrible. Don't try to talk fancy if you have trouble with even the simple.
And you keep compressing 1.5 billion years into an instant. You cannot compare an explosion to a billion years. It simply does not work that way.
Your associations are also weak. The sun being timely? Yeah, it sets right at sunset like it should! That is INCREDIBLY stupid. We EVOLVED on a solar schedule. We also evolved on a lunar one (menstruation would be a good example). Saying that they fit us has it ass backwards.
Your inability to see beauty as being random is just sad. Everything may have an explanation, but not everything has a reason.
By evolution. One group was able to replicate when millions of other combos could not. Eventually one did better than the others and became more proliferant. The growth spread and some did better in some areas than others.
You get a few billion years and stuff can happen.
These cells did not PLAN this you doofus. You seem to think that someone laid out an evolutionary schedule for 1.5 billion years.
Yeah, a comittee of 1 celled organisms got together and planned their own evolution into man.
You are conflating too many things together and ruling out some because you do not understand them and they conflict with your own simple, magical solution.
Again, just ask yourself. Does God need to work with a magic wand, or is "he" really the one that used the way things were to make what is now?
One atheist biology scientist said something in a 1990's copy of the Watchtower Magazine that should silence the most ardent and fanatical evolutionist. This is what he said;
The notion that amino acids and the building blocks of life combined in perfect sequence, in perfect chemistry, in perfect temperature to create life and the sorroundings that abated it to have been just perfect, is akin to placing a bomb besides a box of blank paper and a gallon of ink and the subsequent explosion creating the unabridged version of the Encyclopedia Britannica with its 22 volumes and every single word in the english language written with its perfect definition and not a single misspelled letter on it, that's the mathematical coincidence that would been relatively neccessary for life to been created blindly by mere chance.
Um, no. That would not silence anybody. In fact, that would just rile them up.
The statement you quoted is flawed. None of it is perfect. Its actually the imperfections that caused the first proto-organism to exist, the imperfections that then caused it to evolve, and all the imperfections that caused all descendants to compete while natural selection broke them off into distinct lifeforms.
<tap tap tap>This the bridge you're trying to sell me?<tap tap tap>Well, it is in Brooklyn, and I will sell it to you for a cheep price. You are guaranteed to earn your money back!