Or set this entire universe into motion with all its laws fine tuned for life. But no, it goes against the words of the Bible, which supposedly speaks for the hypothetical Creator. Such arrogance.
There is none better to read the mind of a god than the mortal who created the god.Who better to read the mind of a god then a mortal right?
Second question of mine: why is this thread still open?
boring...
Explaining Evolution to a creationist is is more of a waste of time than trying to explain your pet the new sandy bridge architecture.
Or set this entire universe into motion with all its laws fine tuned for life. But no, it goes against the words of the Bible, which supposedly speaks for the hypothetical Creator. Such arrogance.
What exactly goes against the words of the bible?
In the time it would take for a hydraulics augmented drill press with a diamond tip forged by the very blood of the artisans that created it to drill through your skull to deliver an enema of knowledge, a single worm could evolve into a galactic civilization powerful enough to transcend the mortal coil and destroy the higher beings of the universe, twice.
It has not been demonstrated that life began at all. For that matter, we're not really sure what "life" is. We call certain things "alive," and we call other things "dead," but the lines we draw between them are basically arbitrary and only drawn out of pragmatism.
Personally, I'm a panpsychist. I do not believe that there is such a thing as "dead" matter, or matter without consciousness.
I know it's pretty preposterous on its face. I've carefully considered it, however, and I do believe it is true. I don't purport to have any type of evidence or arguments that should necessarily convince anyone else, though.That's crazy, I do believe in "dead" matter, but I believe there is much "live" matter in some sense everywhere.
I also don't mean "that's crazy" as in "you're fucking insane and need medication", just I have never really thought of it like that.
I know it's pretty preposterous on its face. I've carefully considered it, however, and I do believe it is true. I don't purport to have any type of evidence or arguments that should necessarily convince anyone else, though.
I know it's pretty preposterous on its face. I've carefully considered it, however, and I do believe it is true. I don't purport to have any type of evidence or arguments that should necessarily convince anyone else, though.
While I can't argue that I understand what it is you describe, I will add this: the definition of life is quite intriguing in some ways. Many scholars state that viruses are not technically life, and I find that to be quite hysterically inaccurate. I do not have the credentials to truly argue one case or the other, but viruses are quite the awe-inspiring little shits when you take all of biological matter into perspective. I mean, they seem to simply exist to cause as much damage to the animal way of life as possible. And their methods of operation are ludicrous; they swap and combine strands of DNA, and only do so to further their chance at wrecking havoc amongst the animal kingdom.
Not me, I came from the hospital! I was born there because I wanted to be close to my mother.It's much more fun to pretend we either came from monkeys or came from God.
Ah, Virus vs. Life is the true debate, but how many people really care to highlight it? It's much more fun to pretend we either came from monkeys or came from God.