I'm with the OP on this one. No one is forcing them to do this particular job ergo its their choice. Boohoo, you suffer verbal abuse. Then quit!
Im going to laugh when people get blown up in flight because they didnt want someones private areas inspected where the bomber hid the bomb.
Why should they bother putting the bomb on the flight, when they can just blow it up in the TSA security line while the TSOs are feeling everyone up?
Why should they bother putting the bomb on the flight, when they can just blow it up in the TSA security line while the TSOs are feeling everyone up?
Who knows. Would make more sense to traget other things with with much higher density of people that doesnt require you to get near a security check point of any kind.
We have let the terrorists win by allowing them to influence the policies that direct our daily life. It's just that simple. By not resisting their influence, we have surrendered our will to them.
QFT.
The goal of terrorism is to cause fear. We're so fucking scared we don't give a shit that a child is at an airport, half naked, being groped by a stranger. That's fear. And this in the "land of the free and home of the brave?" My ass.
More QFTbamacre said:QFT.
The goal of terrorism is to cause fear. We're so fucking scared we don't give a shit that a child is at an airport, half naked, being groped by a stranger. That's fear. And this in the "land of the free and home of the brave?" My ass.
Last I recall, righties were all for warrantless wiretaps, black renditions, waterboarding, and complete disregard for due process procedures. But I guess when confronted by the prospect of a pat-down, it's just too much for your fragile psyches to bear, and all you macho types go NIMBY.
Last I recall, righties were all for warrantless wiretaps, black renditions, waterboarding, and complete disregard for due process procedures. But I guess when confronted by the prospect of a pat-down, it's just too much for your fragile psyches to bear, and all you macho types go NIMBY.
Your brush is too broad for this business.
Last I recall, righties were all for warrantless wiretaps, black renditions, waterboarding, and complete disregard for due process procedures. But I guess when confronted by the prospect of a pat-down, it's just too much for your fragile psyches to bear, and all you macho types go NIMBY.
And if I recall, those on the left were flailing their arms like apes regarding this shit when Bush was in office. Hypocrites pointing out others' hypocrisy.
TSA workers are doing a job for money that is breaking the Bill of Rights and the Constitution of the United States. They are simply reaping what they are sowing. You will never NEVER be happy and enjoy a job for money that is disgusting and hurting sexually, your fellow human beings. They have no business fondling people in the name of security. That is a bunch of BS. Israel successfully uses profiling and we need to do the same thing. This BS of being "politically correct" is defunct and man pleasing. We should have the honor and integrity to be honest moral people who will not sell their soul for a bowl of beans or rice.
TSA workers will have to endure worse and worse conditions. They are doing the work of a communist socialist agenda. They are traitors and if they don't realize it, they are so blind spiritually that they probably don't care but they whine and complain about it.
We flail our arms at REAL invasions of privacy. Like the government monitoring our emails or listening to our phone calls or secretly finding out what books we buy, especially in situations where we have no choice AND don't know if big brother is there. A one-second full-body scan at an airport is small potatoes in comparison.
All of that bullshit? Are you against passing through a metal detector or putting your carry-ons and checked baggage through scanners? And if not, what in principle is the difference between those and going through a full-body scan, where your face is obscured? Or should impositions only be made on those who look like arabs?I've always been against all of that bullshit. It seems to me that most of the people against this on this forum are the moderates.
Hypocrite.
We flail our arms at REAL invasions of privacy. Like the government monitoring our emails or listening to our phone calls or secretly finding out what books we buy, especially in situations where we have no choice AND don't know if big brother is there. A one-second full-body scan at an airport is small potatoes in comparison.
Or you could be a nonpartisan hack and oppose both, like me.
So which is a bigger privacy issue: some guy shoving his hands down my pants or someone listening in to a phone call? Both are wrong, but it takes a real knuckle dragger to say that wiretapping is a comparable breach, let alone worse.We flail our arms at REAL invasions of privacy. Like the government monitoring our emails or listening to our phone calls or secretly finding out what books we buy, especially in situations where we have no choice AND don't know if big brother is there. A one-second full-body scan at an airport is small potatoes in comparison.
All of that bullshit? Are you against passing through a metal detector or putting your carry-ons and checked baggage through scanners? And if not, what in principle is the difference between those and going through a full-body scan, where your face is obscured? Or should impositions only be made on those who look like arabs?
Im going to laugh when people get blown up in flight because they didnt want someones private areas inspected where the bomber hid the bomb.
My solution is to hire special team of VERY attractive male and female screeners specifically for the pat downs and these will be done opposite sex basis (or based on your sexuality). Ta da!
Are you saying you oppose ALL anti-terrorism measures that place any burden at all on U.S. citizens?
If it's a suicide bomber they can just as well have the bomb surgically implanted. Good luck finding that with the infallible patdown method.
Thanks to the fear of Al Qaida the USA is hurting itself and limiting the freedom of 'the land of the free' far more than Al Qaida ever could.