apoppin
Lifer
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: apoppin
McCain is perfect as President !!
:thumbsup:
for 1958 .. as i said .. he had fresh ideas then
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: apoppin
McCain is perfect as President !!
:thumbsup:
Originally posted by: TallPilot
America's current foreign and domestic policies stink like Bush's freshly extruded turds, smeared all across the bathroom walls by Dick Cheney, but I'll wave my Chinese manufactured American-flag-on-a-stick as energetically as necessary in order to try and dispel the odor.
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Setting aside my problems with Hillary (evil hack) or Obama (arch-Lib). . .
Originally posted by: TallPilot
Like it or not, McCain will be the next president, no way hillary or obama can get ellected
Originally posted by: eskimospy
To say that McCain condemned Falwell and then somehow went into the lion's den to reach out to his former enemies is an incredibly dishonest way of framing what actually happened. Let's be honest here. In 2000, McCain said Falwell was an 'agent of intolerance'. In 2008, he was asked about it and pretty much said 'I don't think that any more'. In reality this is called "sucking up to the hard right to win the presidential nomination". In addition, he is nowhere close to the maverick that everyone likes to think he is. He voted with the GOP majority close to 90% of the time. OOOooooh! Such daring!
You can like him if you want, but you should at least be honest with yourself about why you do.
As a Ron Paul supporter how can you even suggest censorship?? That goes against everything a libertarian stands for.Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
McCain doesn't have a chance. It will be either Hitlery or Osama. I hope the one that does get elected supports some kind of internet censorship because I can't watch shit like that anymore.
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
As a Ron Paul supporter how can you even suggest censorship?? That goes against everything a libertarian stands for.Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
McCain doesn't have a chance. It will be either Hitlery or Osama. I hope the one that does get elected supports some kind of internet censorship because I can't watch shit like that anymore.
Originally posted by: Painman
Originally posted by: TallPilot
America's current foreign and domestic policies stink like Bush's freshly extruded turds, smeared all across the bathroom walls by Dick Cheney, but I'll wave my Chinese manufactured American-flag-on-a-stick as energetically as necessary in order to try and dispel the odor.
Fixed.
Originally posted by: eskimospy
To say that McCain condemned Falwell and then somehow went into the lion's den to reach out to his former enemies is an incredibly dishonest way of framing what actually happened. Let's be honest here. In 2000, McCain said Falwell was an 'agent of intolerance'. In 2008, he was asked about it and pretty much said 'I don't think that any more'. In reality this is called "sucking up to the hard right to win the presidential nomination". In addition, he is nowhere close to the maverick that everyone likes to think he is. He voted with the GOP majority close to 90% of the time. OOOooooh! Such daring!
You can like him if you want, but you should at least be honest with yourself about why you do.
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Originally posted by: eskimospy
To say that McCain condemned Falwell and then somehow went into the lion's den to reach out to his former enemies is an incredibly dishonest way of framing what actually happened. Let's be honest here. In 2000, McCain said Falwell was an 'agent of intolerance'. In 2008, he was asked about it and pretty much said 'I don't think that any more'. In reality this is called "sucking up to the hard right to win the presidential nomination". In addition, he is nowhere close to the maverick that everyone likes to think he is. He voted with the GOP majority close to 90% of the time. OOOooooh! Such daring!
You can like him if you want, but you should at least be honest with yourself about why you do.
Daring enough to make him a red-headed stepchild to many on the hard right.
I am honest with myself... McCain panders less than most (including Hillary or Obama IMO). That's it.
You should be honest and admit that McCain has never had a strong relationship with the religoes on the Right and certainly isn't their ideal candidate. Of course he still wants all the votes he can get, but everyone knows he has a general distaste for the fundamentals.
Originally posted by: manowar821
So you guys want to vote another terrorist into the white house?
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Originally posted by: eskimospy
To say that McCain condemned Falwell and then somehow went into the lion's den to reach out to his former enemies is an incredibly dishonest way of framing what actually happened. Let's be honest here. In 2000, McCain said Falwell was an 'agent of intolerance'. In 2008, he was asked about it and pretty much said 'I don't think that any more'. In reality this is called "sucking up to the hard right to win the presidential nomination". In addition, he is nowhere close to the maverick that everyone likes to think he is. He voted with the GOP majority close to 90% of the time. OOOooooh! Such daring!
You can like him if you want, but you should at least be honest with yourself about why you do.
Daring enough to make him a red-headed stepchild to many on the hard right.
I am honest with myself... McCain panders less than most (including Hillary or Obama IMO). That's it.
You should be honest and admit that McCain has never had a strong relationship with the religoes on the Right and certainly isn't their ideal candidate. Of course he still wants all the votes he can get, but everyone knows he has a general distaste for the fundamentals.
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: manowar821
So you guys want to vote another terrorist into the white house?
Terrorism is an effective means of achieving political, societal and economic goals. There are several good books regarding the political economy of terrorism that are worth reading. Of course, some people consider the use of terror to achieve goals distasteful. But I'm not in the position to make that kind of moral judgement when results are far more important.
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Originally posted by: eskimospy
To say that McCain condemned Falwell and then somehow went into the lion's den to reach out to his former enemies is an incredibly dishonest way of framing what actually happened. Let's be honest here. In 2000, McCain said Falwell was an 'agent of intolerance'. In 2008, he was asked about it and pretty much said 'I don't think that any more'. In reality this is called "sucking up to the hard right to win the presidential nomination". In addition, he is nowhere close to the maverick that everyone likes to think he is. He voted with the GOP majority close to 90% of the time. OOOooooh! Such daring!
You can like him if you want, but you should at least be honest with yourself about why you do.
Daring enough to make him a red-headed stepchild to many on the hard right.
I am honest with myself... McCain panders less than most (including Hillary or Obama IMO). That's it.
You should be honest and admit that McCain has never had a strong relationship with the religoes on the Right and certainly isn't their ideal candidate. Of course he still wants all the votes he can get, but everyone knows he has a general distaste for the fundamentals.
Daring:roll:. McCain, the man of honor and integrity who will do whatever it takes to win. Isn't that an oxymoron?
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: manowar821
So you guys want to vote another terrorist into the white house?
Terrorism is an effective means of achieving political, societal and economic goals. There are several good books regarding the political economy of terrorism that are worth reading. Of course, some people consider the use of terror to achieve goals distasteful. But I'm not in the position to make that kind of moral judgement when results are far more important.
So you have no problem with terrorism so long as it's your side doing it?
Originally posted by: manowar821
So you guys want to vote another terrorist into the white house?