Kaido
Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
- Feb 14, 2004
- 48,518
- 5,340
- 136
Yet you refuse to answer the question?
Why should they be paid more than their value?
It is an entry level job that requires no skill set.
Intended on generating some spending money.
You want more spending money; either move up or out.
Many fast food places have help wanted signs for shift managers as well as regular workers out all the time.
A shift manager may have to be more responsible; work harder and get a little higher pay.
There are limited slots within a location; but if those are unfilled; it indicates that the entry level people are not wanting to qualify for those slots. They are happy having to take no responsibility, not work harder and receive the pay they signed up for.
Well that's more of a system question. Our current system is capitalism; under those rules, you get paid what your perceived value is. Bottom line: the world pays you what they think you are worth. That doesn't make it right from a moral standpoint; it's pretty cold-hearted to say that people who can't do better should be stuck in poverty for life, but that's the reality of our existing system.
The common debate is, should you help a homeless person, like if the guy is a vet with his legs blown off and has PTSD? Some camps say your situation is your situation and so there ("get a job!"), but I'd like to see those same people be put in that exact situation and not be on the street begging for handouts. It's just an excuse, and also, some people really are that cold.
The trouble is, it's hard to make sweeping changes on things that aren't cut & dried. Social workers are already overloaded as it is and the system is extensively abused. Habits get made and people get comfortable. One of the benefits of capitalism is that it provides a lot of motivation through financial incentives, because if you get out there & work, you get paid and have more economic power. Wait, this is starting to sound like a P&N thread