Looks like a lot of people need a few cases of Diaper Cream...
1. Hard times creates hard men.
2. Hard men creates good times.
3. Good times creates soft men.
4. Soft men creates hard times.
We are at step 4.
How does that work. I'm going to burn the house down preemptively before you do it? That saves the house?Sadly he won’t break democracy to save it
I think the basic idea is that if the outcome is inevitable you might as well make it to your advantage.How does that work. I'm going to burn the house down preemptively before you do it? That saves the house?
Looks like a lot of people need a few cases of Diaper Cream...
Lol, he couldn't take it and edited his post.You are step 4.
So you are cool with the president of the United States being completely above the law in basically all regards?Looks like a lot of people need a few cases of Diaper Cream...
It's his signature, I like to throw it in his face occasionally. Like most of the MAGA crowd he thinks he is tough and independent. Ionically he is the source of the problem, not the fix.Lol, he couldn't take it and edited his post.
So you are cool with the president of the United States being completely above the law in basically all regards?
That literally was the ruling. Giving orders to the military is an official act and therefore the president is absolutely immune for any orders he gives them. The ruling is very clear on this.That wasn't the ruling by SCOTUS.
The President needs immunity for his official actions. Not for all this Hyperbolic bull shit being brought up in this and the other thread where they are "discussing" it.
Do you think the President should not have any immunity for his actions?
That wasn't the ruling by SCOTUS.
The President needs immunity for his official actions. Not for all this Hyperbolic bull shit being brought up in this and the other thread where they are "discussing" it.
Do you think the President should not have any immunity for his actions?
Alright, official action: Trump is a threat to democracy, he tried to overthrow it once, and he's stated he intends to be a dictator (regardless of your opinion as to his seriousness, he stated it). It would be an official act of the executive branch to take action on that, and imprison Trump, his rival for the seat of presidency on the next election.That wasn't the ruling by SCOTUS.
The President needs immunity for his official actions. Not for all this Hyperbolic bull shit being brought up in this and the other thread where they are "discussing" it.
Do you think the President should not have any immunity for his actions?
As I said all the Hyperbolic bull shit being spewed is amazing.
We both know that is an illegal order.
There is no such thing as an illegal order anymore.As I said all the Hyperbolic bull shit being spewed is amazing.
We both know that is an illegal order.
It wasn't documented because it wasn't presumed that the chief executive would attempt a coup. Now one has, and the judicial branch has rendered judgement that it's legal. That's a problem.Not going to argue about it. The President has had limited immunity even when it isn't documented for >200 years.
I know you guys are going to wring your hands and make up fantasies about killing people, expanding the SCOTUS to 50 to 100 justices etc....
I hope you enjoy yourselves.
Not going to argue about it. The President has had limited immunity even when it isn't documented for >200 years.
I know you guys are going to wring your hands and make up fantasies about killing people, expanding the SCOTUS to 50 to 100 justices etc....
I hope you enjoy yourselves.
And you are pathetic ignorant asshat. Trump voter. I hope Trump locks your whole family up for reasons if he becomes King, I mean President. At this point that would be only thing you and your other magats clowns understand. You all have no idea that shitshow coming for your poor asses. You think you are on winning side being a magat? If project 2025 happens you will burn with the rest of us “woke”Looks like a lot of people need a few cases of Diaper Cream...
You guys are the ones claiming "we got him" as he continues to evade all justice. So who is getting what wrong?
Cool, got him on some hush money charges that will literally do no harm to him, will not get him into prison, and will certainly not keep him out of the WH.
Again, who is getting it wrong here? Not to mention all the "Biden is the only one who can beat Trump" nonsense when even the majority of Dem voters didn't want him to run again, and that was BEFORE his debate debacle.
When Biden loses, and all the exit polls scream about his age and cognitive decline, I'm sure you'll find a way to spin that too.
As I said all the Hyperbolic bull shit being spewed is amazing.
We both know that is an illegal order.
Oh yeah, I have sigs hidden on my phone.It's his signature, I like to throw it in his face occasionally. Like most of the MAGA crowd he thinks he is tough and independent. Ionically he is the source of the problem, not the fix.
Don’t bother Pcgeek is magat with brain damage. He wants dictatorship as long as his people are in charge.It wasn't documented because it wasn't presumed that the chief executive would attempt a coup. Now one has, and the judicial branch has rendered judgement that it's legal. That's a problem.
You haven’t read the ruling then. The fact that it is an illegal order is IRRELEVANT. The president is absolutely immune when he issues illegal orders and not only is he immune, his motivation for issuing the order cannot be considered.As I said all the Hyperbolic bull shit being spewed is amazing.
We both know that is an illegal order.
No, I think the president should have to follow the law in both unofficial and official actions. There is a massive difference in wide leeway around official actions and straight up immunity. Immunity means the president can do whatever they want as long as it is at least tangentally official.That wasn't the ruling by SCOTUS.
The President needs immunity for his official actions. Not for all this Hyperbolic bull shit being brought up in this and the other thread where they are "discussing" it.
Do you think the President should not have any immunity for his actions?