As far as some of the suggestions, I'll weigh in with some thoughts in bold-
1. Bunkering is allowed BUT most of us know of the "ncpu" change or the boincmgr hack, it's not allowed. No 100 cpu machines that are only 26...
Keep it what you got. Then everyone is dependent on their own Skillz and Hardware not software or config cheats. -I don't necessarily have an issue with people doing this, but I would be on board with it not being allowed. Bunkering is a pain anyways, so if it can be limited somewhat that would make everybody's lives a bit easier
2. No team switching, easy to follow. -Agree with this
3. It would be nice if the sprint started when the event project was announced. Plus no one knows the project, that was being implemented when FB was closed. -I would tend to agree, but maybe it could make sense to give like a 6 or 12 hour notice instead of 24? Enough time so people can switch their machines over, account for time zone differences, etc. but not cause excess tasks bunkered and dumping as the contest starts causing excess server load.
4. Not to have so many sprints, it's too many to me. I need at least 2 weeks to baby my rigs, crunch my fav projects and handle my life. Maybe even 1 sprint a month? -I definitely agree with this. The concept of following Formula 1 races is cool, but when they're one after the other(especially if trying to speculative bunker, upgrade hardware, etc.) it's a pretty brutal schedule if trying to be competitive.
5. If you don't own them then don't run them, I have heard of teams that work for universities or large corps that have used those machines in the past. No drama here, just a observation and nothing was ever REALLY FACTS.
Not sure on this but figured I would put it in the mix, use your own hardware.... -I'm not 100% sure how I feel about this. It is somewhat annoying in the Primegrid challenges(non FB) for example that the top crunchers are just 'paying to play' by launching a ton of cloud instances. On the other hand, it levels the playing field somewhat for smaller teams to be able to do that. I would be fine with this being a requirement though
6. Don't look at what was done to start drama it tears us apart. Plus come up with a way of reporting a suspect team or individual to a secondary group of stats guys for further analysis, so it doesn't' create drama on the board. Keep the board fun and exciting or we'll never draw any new members. -I would agree with this. Maybe there could be a private 'Team Concerns' or something sub forum even and each team chooses 1-2 people on their team with access to that? The idea being you don't need a whole team of people piling on one way or the other, so there could be a private forum of 'team captain' type members from each team that are going to be less likely to turn it into a flame war. Just a thought.