Souka - Everyone has their own opinions when it comes to hard drives. I respect them all.
1) Ugh, if the c: partition beconmes corruptetd, the other partitions will likely fail as well....the partition info is all stored in the same place...one goes, all three will likely go.
I'm taking about OS corruption, not errors in the FAT. Perhaps I need to clarify this. If the OS becomes badly corrupted, you can safely format c: without losing data.
2) "The final partition or E DRIVE will use the 1 GB you saved back. This partition should be used for the "swap file" or...." This is sooo wrong minded. By putting the swapfile out on this partition, it's on the slowest part of the HD (1/3 less throughput..varies by drive)....and the heads will have to seek a full stroke everytime they need data further slowing down the HD. Keep swap on primary drive, set mininum size to like 128mb, max to whatever ya have. It's a good balance between static and dynamic....
The difference in speed is largely irrelevant since most of todays systems have a large amounts of ram. The swap file is rarely used under most conditions. If it is utilized, there is no speed difference that is noticable to the user. Any benchmark tests I've ever read comparing throughput from the inner to outer drive tracks utilize a continous, sustain read of A LOT of data. While I do acknowledge there is a difference, swap file usage is not even similar, it's access is performed in bursts of a few milliseconds. My question, can you differentiate between 9 milliseconds and 90 milliseconds? Can you tell the difference in the swap file transfer of say 10MB of data at rate of 10 MB/s and 100 MB/s? Does it really matter? Personnally, I don't think so.
As far as having the swap file on your OS partition...IMO BAD. The swap file CANNOT be defragmented. Thus, if it's on your OS partition, then you cannot effectively defrag the most important part of the drive. IMO, a fragmented OS partition will effect performance 100x more when compared to the virtues of an inner/outer swap file. Worse yet is having it dynamic, this will only lead to additional fragmentation.
Fun Stuff!