Peter Parker is supposed to be the nerdy metrosexual type.
You obviously don't know what metrosexual means. Its not a new word for geeky nerd, wuite the opposite, actually.
Peter Parker is supposed to be the nerdy metrosexual type.
Originally posted by: BladeWalker
What makes Spiderman and Superman (as played by Reeves) as ideal superheroes are the fact that they are pacifists by nature, but yet have incredible powers. They are mild-mannered, somewhat insecure, and soft spoken in demeanor to reinforce the pacifist-type. Pacifist generally have a better sense of justice than your typical shoot-first-and-ask-question-later type heroes, thus it is that quality that elevate them to the status of superheroes.
What makes Spiderman and Superman (as played by Reeves) as ideal superheroes are the fact that they are pacifists by nature, but yet have incredible powers. They are mild-mannered, somewhat insecure, and soft spoken in demeanor to reinforce the pacifist-type. Pacifist generally have a better sense of justice than your typical shoot-first-and-ask-question-later type heroes, thus it is that quality that elevate them to the status of superheroes.
Originally posted by: PingSpike
If you don't think Kirsten Dunst was hot in bring it on, your opinion regarding the attractiveness of women is hereby null and void since you are clearly a closeted homosexual. No straight man would spout such blasphemy.
Originally posted by: warcrow
RB has a good point here. Peter Parker isnt Clark Kent trying to be a wuss or clumsy....he IS a loser. Losing his job, can't pay the rent, can't save his uncle, can't save his aunt from losing the house.....its closer to real life than Bruce Wayne, you know?
Originally posted by: bladewalker
You know, there are too many movies with the toughguy syndrome as the defining character for the lead part. Go watch your Steven Segal, Rambo, Dirty Harry, The Rock, and Vin Deisal flicks. You may like your violent heroes, but I like to see something different once in awhile.
What makes Spiderman and Superman (as played by Reeves) as ideal superheroes are the fact that they are pacifists by nature, but yet have incredible powers. They are mild-mannered, somewhat insecure, and soft spoken in demeanor to reinforce the pacifist-type. Pacifist generally have a better sense of justice than your typical shoot-first-and-ask-question-later type heroes, thus it is that quality that elevate them to the status of superheroes.
IMO, Tobey did a good job playing Spiderman.
Originally posted by: ndee
god damn, I can't stand that guy. His sissy voice ruins the whole movie. He seems like a retard in that movie.... bleh! -5/10 for that Spiderman 2 movie.
BTW, I saw the Spiderman 2 thread, this one is about the sissy boy.
Originally posted by: AmericasTeam
Originally posted by: ndee
god damn, I can't stand that guy. His sissy voice ruins the whole movie. He seems like a retard in that movie.... bleh! -5/10 for that Spiderman 2 movie.
BTW, I saw the Spiderman 2 thread, this one is about the sissy boy.
You're a fool.
To the bottom with this thread.
Originally posted by: UglyCassanova
Matt Damon as Spiderman? Wtf?
Exactly....Metrosexual is a smooth-talking, well dressed, trendy type.Originally posted by: DigDug
Peter Parker is supposed to be the nerdy metrosexual type.
You obviously don't know what metrosexual means. Its not a new word for geeky nerd, wuite the opposite, actually.
Originally posted by: ndee
Originally posted by: UglyCassanova
Matt Damon as Spiderman? Wtf?
He's for SURE a better actor than the Sissy Boy.
Originally posted by: UglyCassanova
Originally posted by: ndee
Originally posted by: UglyCassanova
Matt Damon as Spiderman? Wtf?
He's for SURE a better actor than the Sissy Boy.
No, he would be miscast and would not fit the role of Spidey at all, but I guess it would satisfy everyone by having "someone cool" rather than a "sissy boy".
Originally posted by: ndee
Originally posted by: UglyCassanova
Originally posted by: ndee
Originally posted by: UglyCassanova
Matt Damon as Spiderman? Wtf?
He's for SURE a better actor than the Sissy Boy.
No, he would be miscast and would not fit the role of Spidey at all, but I guess it would satisfy everyone by having "someone cool" rather than a "sissy boy".
there are cool sissy boys and uncool sissy boys. Tobey Sissy Boy is uncool.
Originally posted by: UglyCassanova
Originally posted by: ndee
Originally posted by: UglyCassanova
Originally posted by: ndee
Originally posted by: UglyCassanova
Matt Damon as Spiderman? Wtf?
He's for SURE a better actor than the Sissy Boy.
No, he would be miscast and would not fit the role of Spidey at all, but I guess it would satisfy everyone by having "someone cool" rather than a "sissy boy".
there are cool sissy boys and uncool sissy boys. Tobey Sissy Boy is uncool.
So was Peter Parker.
His acting wasn't great, but I don't think he ruined the movie... if you noticed, when he had his costume on his self confidence was through the roof and he was enthusiastic. I don't quite remember Parker as being THAT nerdy, but I can understand why they portrayed him like that to contrast the two totally polar sides. Eventually in the comics, Parker does turn normal and is actually a smartass as Spiderman, where he'll make funny remarks while in the middle of battle to tick his opponent off...Originally posted by: ndee
I can empathize with the normal underdogs, but not with a retard. For me, it's just his facial expressions and his glance that's just plain retarded. He might play the role good BUT his acting is just stupid.
And skace, STFU already.
It sounds like they took the Parker from high school and put him in college, b/c Parker actually had more confidence and maturity in college.High School
Peter was an honor student, and his teachers always thought very highly of him. He always came prepared for class, and completed all of his asignments. The other students , however, had little time for a know-it-all like puny Peter. The girls thought he was too quiet, and the boys considered him a wimp. Peter was painfully shy, and some of his classmates misinterpreted his silence for snobbery. He had trouble making friends, but never stopped trying. He often invited other students to join him at science exhibits or monster movies. But they usually responded with ridicule, and almost never asked him to join them.