- Jul 20, 2001
- 70,229
- 28,939
- 136
I don't think I like the idea of a net worth or assets tax.every billionaire is a policy failure, need to tax them a hell of a lot more
'Every Billionaire Is a Policy Failure,' Says Oxfam as Global Elite Gather in Davos | Common Dreams
As the world's corporate and political elite convened in Davos, Switzerland for the first winter World Economic Forum in three years, an analysis published Monday by Oxfam International found that the global rich have captured nearly two-thirds of all wealth generated since 2020.www.commondreams.org
We already have asset taxes at the the low end of the scale (houses), just not for the kind of assets the very wealthy tend to hoard.I don't think I like the idea of a net worth or assets tax.
On the extremely wealthy or just on yourself?I don't think I like the idea of a net worth or assets tax.
We already have asset taxes at the the low end of the scale (houses), just not for the kind of assets the very wealthy tend to hoard.
Both.On the extremely wealthy or just on yourself?
Well, somebody from their class, or our class is going to have to kick in more money to replace aging schools, airports, roads, bridges and keep SS afloat and so on. Who would you rather it be? They are willing to spend $$Billions to make sure it’s us. I say screw that.Both.
I argue the exact opposite.Asset taxes shouldn't be a thing. It's not right that one can spend their whole life saving up for their house, boat, cottage etc, but then be punished for it and in some cases may even have to give it up because they can't afford the taxes on it anymore when they retire. Any policy you try to target "the rich" with will also apply to everyone else including middle class. Middle class people who are smart with their money can still participate in rich people things like having assets, if they save up. We shouldn't be punished on stuff that we worked for. That money was already taxed when it was earned. IMO property taxes shouldn't even be a thing either. I would rather see a municipal income tax to fund municipal infrastructure/services. At least then you can retire and not be stuck with a huge ongoing tax bill because you have a big house that you worked hard for all your life. Income tax is probably the fairest form of tax as it's based on how much you make that year. So you make less, you pay less. If you want to go after the rich then fix the income tax system so that they have to pay into it too instead of being able to use loopholes to get out of it. Trump for example pays like around $1,000/year in taxes, that's less than I pay per pay cheque, that is something that needs to change. ideally we also need fairer brackets. With inflation, making 100k is not even that rich anymore, so why should someone making 100k be in one of the highest brackets? I'd rather see the government shrink and then have a flat 10% tax so that we all pay way less, but that's another topic. If we're going to keep the current system at least make it more fair so only the ultra rich are paying the higher brackets.
Sure it sucks that some rich people just hoard a bunch of money or buy rediculous assets but life is not fair. If Musk wants to play with his rockets or buy a website for billions or Trump wants to own a bunch of high rise buildings then that should be their right. Just make sure that they pay lot of tax on the income. What they do with the remainder should be their right after that.
Not necessarily. A pure asset tax would not have that discouragement. Have $30k cash/banked? That is taxed. Have a $30k boat? That is taxed the exact same amount as the $30k of liquid assets. Structured that way, there is no reason to avoid buying that boat or that house.But asset taxes would actually discourage from buying things. If I buy a house or boat or whatever and now I have to pay taxes on it every month then at some point renting becomes cheaper. I really don't want to have to rent, I rather own, and shouldn't have to pay for life for that.
I wouldn’t be in favor of a 100% death tax on all assets. It’s very natural for parents who have saved and/or invested well to want to pass some of that on to their children. A tax law that completely bypasses natural maternal and paternal instincts would be unjust in my opinion. So there are lines that need to be drawn. One area that would need to be addressed are certain types of trusts that allow all assets to be passes tax free to adult children - most typically in wealthy families.I'd be quite thrilled with NO income tax, NO sales tax, but 100% tax upon death (with single* spouse/children under 18 survival exceptions). Imagine your whole life without paying a penny in tax--ever. Only when you die do you pay tax and you won't care then, because, well, you are dead. That can only happen with asset taxes. *Single as in if a husband/wife dies, the wife/husband gets the property, but if the wife then dies it does not transfer tax free to future husbands/wives.
Very few people own the buildings they live in. VERY few.Jeez I would've guessed higher for the median net worth just based on homeownership.
I hoard wood.