Just wait until sh!t starts hitting the fan on this decision. Effectively it's a green light for corporations to steal employee wages, since arbitration is rigged against the employees, and it's not cost effective to contest each case individually without class action status. It's only a matter of time before the corporations take it to its logical extreme and we have a massive scandal. Democrats should run against the right wing SCOTUS, it's going to be a winner for them.I can already envision what Republicans will attempt. I was wondering about their opposition and you've provided your opinion. Props on that. Not many can it seems.
The issue is not whether or not he's a journalist. The issue is, he knowingly broke the law and was duly arrested for doing so.
Only thing that bugs me about this, then, is how he caught their attention in the first place. A guy standing on the street using his cell phone actually stood out to them, and presented itself as cause to arrest him? I'm either getting too damn old for this world and/or am simply not aware of just how provocative his presence was.
If you do not protest the violation of the rights of others, why should anyone protest when they violate yours ?We got a SCOTUS that just voted along party lines to deny 60 Million workers their right to sue, but we are supposed to focus on what a court in the UK is doing instead?
That's a stupid mentality. Fix your own house first.If you do not protest the violation of the rights of others, why should anyone protest when they violate yours ?
I knew it. I absolutely called it. Not only did you ignore the question but you went with "poor Tommy" as your strawman. Something over which the Dems have no control? You invented that, naturally. The question was explicitly about once they acquire control. Andy By God Jackson, you think they won't, do you?
Once in power will the Dems change the laws, revoking past ones as well, and make this right.
One word answer. Yes or no.
Once they gain control? You mean the Presidency, the HOR & a filibuster proof majority in the Senate?
That's pretty far out, don't you think?
But you're going for the they're just as bad routine as if that mitigates this ideologically driven decision from the SCOTUS.
Since you have decided to channel Sarah Sanders, I'll have to go with "no", they won't even try, unless you would care to man up and answer the question.
Here, I'll work this like I might for a legalistic pre-teen.
- "Given that the Democrats gain control of at least one part of Congress, will they attempt to legislate in order to explicitly revoke old law and replace it as to remedy the issue of forced arbitration, Yes or no?
- "If Democrats gain control of Congress in its entirety, will the Dems in Congress do the above and also pass it? Yes or no"
- The above is intended to elicit your opinion on the above two questions with a binary answer. It does not bind you to be correct after the fact as that would demand a certainty no one can provide. Only a "Yes" or "No" is a proper answer. Any addition or diversion is hereby deemed to be tantamount to an answer of "NO" to both questions. If you can put faith in your chosen then neither should anyone else.
Only thing that bugs me about this, then, is how he caught their attention in the first place. A guy standing on the street using his cell phone actually stood out to them, and presented itself as cause to arrest him? I'm either getting too damn old for this world and/or am simply not aware of just how provocative his presence was.
If Congress didn't intend to overrule an old law, why did they write a new one?
Uh, its not like they don't know who the guy is. He's gone out of his way to make himself a bit of a celebrity. Plus, they do have cameras and are very likely using facial recognition tech, especially in areas around court houses since there's a higher probability of something occurring there.
Plus, I mean, sure, if you ignore that the judge told this fuckin dipshit specifically not to do what he did for a reason (maybe because he's prone to doing that?), sure maybe you could be bugged and surprised that he happened to end up doing it. I don't know, maybe they'd be on the lookout for him doing it? Nah...
Zero fucks given as per usual OP...
STFU You worthless POS. This guy was arrested then sentenced on the same day for filming meanwhile the rapists who raped little children get a trial while this guy goes right to jail. His supporters are already marching on the streets demanding his release.
STFU You worthless POS. This guy was arrested then sentenced on the same day for filming meanwhile the rapists who raped little children get a trial while this guy goes right to jail. His supporters are already marching on the streets demanding his release.
STFU You worthless POS. This guy was arrested then sentenced on the same day for filming meanwhile the rapists who raped little children get a trial while this guy goes right to jail. His supporters are already marching on the streets demanding his release.
So, of you read his history, you realize this is not accurate. He was given a trial for his original offense, sentenced, then a judge commuted his sentence for 18 months as long as he didn't reoffend in those 18months, and now when he did, he got tossed back in the slammer.
Are you fucking stupid?
He was ordered not to do this again. Why? Because his actions could help THE ACCUSED by creating the appearance of bias in a criminal trial that can be used on appeal to FREE the fucking child rapists.
this is incorruptible, do you really need to ask this?Are you fucking stupid?
He was ordered not to do this again. Why? Because his actions could help THE ACCUSED by creating the appearance of bias in a criminal trial that can be used on appeal to FREE the fucking child rapists.
STFU You worthless POS. This guy was arrested then sentenced on the same day for filming meanwhile the rapists who raped little children get a trial while this guy goes right to jail. His supporters are already marching on the streets demanding his release.
STFU You worthless POS. This guy was arrested then sentenced on the same day for filming meanwhile the rapists who raped little children get a trial while this guy goes right to jail. His supporters are already marching on the streets demanding his release.
the two laws are about different stuff. it's the intersection of them that's the problem.If Congress didn't intend to overrule an old law, why did they write a new one?
STFU You worthless POS. This guy was arrested then sentenced on the same day for filming meanwhile the rapists who raped little children get a trial while this guy goes right to jail. His supporters are already marching on the streets demanding his release.
the two laws are about different stuff. it's the intersection of them that's the problem.