SirCanealot
Member
- Jan 12, 2013
- 87
- 1
- 71
Incorruptible.
DEAR GOD MAN!
Okay, I believe his first conviction was for filming INSIDE a court, but I don't know anything more past that (and I do like to go by the facts, unlike you). At this time, the judge told him if he breaks the law any more, he will be going to jail. Very simple.
Now, the court case he went to involved multiple trials. I don't see anyone having broke this down very simply for you.
Let's say there's two trials: A and B. Both involve the same group and both are the same charges (let's say...stealing cheese wheels!! :O). There's full media coverage.
Trial A is first. The people in A are found guilty; the media reports this. Trial B starts. The jury has read the media coverage of A and therefore just assumes the people under B are guilty too (even though in this case they are actually innocent!). So everyone under trial B has been denied a fair trial and been wrongly convicted
This is what Tommy was trying to do; mess up a trial against some very bad people.
Now why would he do a thing like that? And if it's so unfair, why did he plead guilty?
Edit: By the way, as a 'leftist' I want to believe in a free and fair society at all, meaning that the people you are referring to as 'leftists' probably aren't just 'leftists'. Unfortunately if you use a simple 2-side system to refer to a vast spectrum, this is where confusion happens ¬_¬
DEAR GOD MAN!
Okay, I believe his first conviction was for filming INSIDE a court, but I don't know anything more past that (and I do like to go by the facts, unlike you). At this time, the judge told him if he breaks the law any more, he will be going to jail. Very simple.
Now, the court case he went to involved multiple trials. I don't see anyone having broke this down very simply for you.
Let's say there's two trials: A and B. Both involve the same group and both are the same charges (let's say...stealing cheese wheels!! :O). There's full media coverage.
Trial A is first. The people in A are found guilty; the media reports this. Trial B starts. The jury has read the media coverage of A and therefore just assumes the people under B are guilty too (even though in this case they are actually innocent!). So everyone under trial B has been denied a fair trial and been wrongly convicted
This is what Tommy was trying to do; mess up a trial against some very bad people.
Now why would he do a thing like that? And if it's so unfair, why did he plead guilty?
Edit: By the way, as a 'leftist' I want to believe in a free and fair society at all, meaning that the people you are referring to as 'leftists' probably aren't just 'leftists'. Unfortunately if you use a simple 2-side system to refer to a vast spectrum, this is where confusion happens ¬_¬
Last edited: