That particular program is one of the few exceptions. I have hopes that next years new Flight Sim from Microsoft does a much better job at using cores. X-Plane 11 is a beautiful game and all, but wow it stinks at multi-core.I right now have an i7-4930k at stock settings and I'm planning on upgrading to an i9-9900KS and other associated hardware as well. I'm not going to get frame rates in the high 100's in X-Plane 11 no matter which CPU I upgrade to. I'm right now getting between 20-30 fps (with adaptive v-sync half refresh rate) in X-Plane 11 with HD Mesh 4.0 installed. I get usually low 20's at huge airports in huge cities where there are mountains nearby. I would like to see a minimum of 30 fps in those areas after a CPU upgrade with my current settings. There are some games that are a challenge to get even over 60 fps consistently and depend heavily on CPU core performance, and this is one of them. I think I choose a 9900KS over a 3900x for my next CPU upgrade.
The only CPU Intel fears is the 3600x2.Why did they do it? Are they THAT MUCH desperate and frightened by the competing products?
NoThe 3900?
As long as the all-core boost doesn't fall 50 Mhz too low. Then it would be a dud.You guys should stop making fun of me and fight for the arrival of 3600x2 too. Arrival of the GRAND DESTROYER. The best value for money customers would get in a decade. Two decades? Ever?
you should ask Adored about this definitely!You guys should stop making fun of me and fight for the arrival of 3600x2 too. Arrival of the GRAND DESTROYER. The best value for money customers would get in a decade. Two decades? Ever?
Oh yeah, the wet dream that throws AMD's profits (and reality) under the bus for the sake of increased blood flow to a forum member's genitourinary region.No
Page 5 - Question - Rethinking AMD consumer CPU lineup in the situation of chiplet scarcity
Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.forums.anandtech.com
Computerbase review :
Intel Core i9-9900KS mit 5,0 GHz im Test
Wachablösung: Die schnellste Spiele-CPU ist ab sofort der Intel Core i9-9900KS. In Anwendungen sinkt die Effizienz dafür deutlich.www.computerbase.de
Huh? Are you talking about my ding dong? I can tell you something, many, many many dings would go dong if AMD released 3600x2 for 269 USD, do doubt about it. Not just mine!!!increased blood flow to a forum member's genitourinary region.
I think everybody is tired of you and your quest for a product that will not happen. At least for many years if at all.Huh? Are you talking about my ding dong? I can tell you something, many, many many dings would go dong if AMD released 3600x2 for 269 USD, do doubt about it. Not just mine!!!
Computerbase review :
No, they are making fun of your outlandish claims and declarations.Some are not tired of making fun of me apparently.
At first I thought you were joking... and now I'm not so sure. And I kind of feel bad for you if you're being serious. What you're proposing is so absurd as to be completely removed from reality, which is why I thought it was a joke.Some are not tired of making fun of me apparently.
Buldozer fermi edition. This time with limited warranty, no tantalum capacitors, but demands full vacuum sucker.Tops the chart in power consumption. Clear win for Intel....Oops! It's not a win.
There are some who want it at any price. I think Arkaign said in another thread, that he tried and missed it. It was in stock at newegg most of the day at $570Dang, the 9900ks release has to be one of the most boring releases ever. And yet, somehow, it is being marked up by e-tailers. <sigh>
Tops the chart in power consumption. Clear win for Intel....Oops! It's not a win.
It's funny how everybody tries to defend ryzen by talking about gaming at 1440 but then when it comes to power consumptions it's only about running a power virus with every power saving feature disabled...Tops the chart in power consumption. Clear win for Intel....Oops! It's not a win.
It's funny how everybody tries to defend ryzen by talking about gaming at 1440 but then when it comes to power consumptions it's only about running a power virus with every power saving feature disabled...
You get a solid constant 5Ghz while gaming at even 1080 with the advertised 127W TDP.
Unlike not even hitting your single core turbo...like, at all.