yllus
Elite Member & Lifer
- Aug 20, 2000
- 20,577
- 432
- 126
It's not like he is just the guy who works in the sales office around the corner from your cubicle. I don't think you can hold him to the same workplace standards that you would hold everyone else to.
Why the hell can't we? The world highly values entertainers, but he's not the king of England (at least technically he isn't; they may make the same amount of money) who gets to smack around mere vassals if he feels like it.
How is it going to help anyone to just fire him? Everyone who works there loses their job, the world loses a fantastic show, and people feel sorry for Jeremy Clarkson. What lesson does it teach?
What lesson does not firing him teach? That if you have enough stage presence or if you bring in loads of cash and jobs, you get to do whatever you want?
Hell, union employees don't get fired for actually getting in a fist fight at work. They get sent for anger management or some type of training to address the root issue. I personally think the root issue is that Jeremy Clarkson is who he is and that BBC encourages him to be himself and that results in some undesirable behavior. It's like having a prize pig that makes you oodles of money and then complaining about the pig crap on the carpet.
I don't especially care of politicians or entertainers are paragons of virtue, but I have to think we need higher standards than this. He should be fired and publicly shamed. I'll miss the show, but good lord people, we're better than this.
Last edited: