- Mar 29, 2010
- 3,691
- 21
- 81
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Performance_Analysis/Destiny_2_Beta/
looks like a decently optimized game but NV has a slight edge.
looks like a decently optimized game but NV has a slight edge.
Running great @3440x1440 on my 1080Ti with everything maxed out except AA. Setting it to MSAA causes frames to literally drop in half with close to no difference in image quality. FXAA or SMAA is the way to go.
I fired it up on my 4k monitor and while it does look nice, I prefer it on my 1440p ultrawide GSync. The screen tearing is also extremely annoying. Good thing is by just setting AA to fxaa I can get a close to ~60fps with everything else maxed out. Very well optimized game for sure.
I played the "beta" demo and the game really has next to nothing on screen at the same time and either very small areas or very large super un-detailed areas (that benefits majorly from LOD).
They nerfed the gameplay hard to fit it into 4+1-3 core jaguar @ 30 fps.
It had the same or less screen complexity (in terms of gameplay) as Halo 3.
I had no tearing at 4k60 on my gsync display, and I found it quite enjoyable. If I could have maintained a solid 144hz+ I probably would be playing on my high refresh rate monitor instead tbh.
This chart shows the RX 580 8GB card at 1440p, using Highest – FXAA as a baseline and High Preset as our target number. We toggled a few settings between Highest and High, ultimately finding that the Depth of Field setting is responsible for about a 38% performance hit on its own, as switching to High boosts FPS from 38 to 62 AVG. 3DAO is responsible for about a 13% hit on its own, moving us to 44FPS from 38FPS AVG.
If you’d like to play on Highest settings without sacrificing too much performance, these are the two options immediately worth tweaking. They seem to presently impact AMD most noticeably.