This is a good postWHY is anyone focusing on the Biden’s ???
Good or bad, what does it matter?
Joe is losing, and it’s not Trump or anything they have done.
It’s Joe.
People just do not want Joe. Democrats want feisty like in Bernie Sanders feisty.
Or fresh as in Pete Buttigieg fresh.
Look.... electing Hillary should have been a no brained.
But Hillary lost that election, no one made her lose it. Hillary simply was the wrong candidate at the right time.
Enter joe Biden.
Same story, different election.
Democrats have some exciting candidates running, fresh new feisty candidates running. They don’t need to dig up dead dogs.
Are you also disputing that Veritas' videos are fake as well? How is Veritas "modifying presentation of videos" when the bernie campaign worker is just saying insane BS like re-education camps and shooting any Trump supporter? It's all right there on video. I don't care about o'keefe, I care about what these lunatics are saying about 49% of the country and what they would want to do to them if Bernie wins.James O'Keefe is?
A. Reputable
B. Well known to violate journalistic ethics and modify presentation of videos to paint a known false narrative including paying multiple civil claims against him for this malfeasance
Anyone who participates in illegal activity against the US, politician or not, should be investigated and prosecuted if warranted. No cages or re-education, etc. But it would be nice if we could confer about our beliefs and understandings regardless of whether we agree with each other in any way. I am curious why you posted what you did.
Meh, that’s just one of 3 emoluments cases, and probably the weakest as I’m not sure I agree Congressional Democrats had standing to file the original suit. They have a better shot at getting the same documents via oversight now that they have the House majority.
Our conclusion is straightforward because the Members -- 29 Senators and 186 Members of the House of Representatives -- do not constitute a majority of either body and are, therefore, powerless to approve or deny the President's acceptance of foreign emoluments.
So do you suggest they impeach again? That would be incredible. I hope another is coming, please dear Lord.During Trump’s impeachment trial his lawyers were simultaneously arguing in one venue that the proper way to enforce subpoenas was impeachment and in another venue that failure to respond to subpoenas was not impeachable.
They don’t care if their legal rationale makes any sense or is hypocritical, they know they are going to lose so the only goal is to delay long enough that the American people don’t get to know all the shit he’s in until after the election.
Let me guess, you think recorded evidence is now fake? Veritas videos are extremely powerful evidence of some of the insane people who work for Bernie.
Let me guess, you think recorded evidence is now fake? Veritas videos are extremely powerful evidence of some of the insane people who work for Bernie.
So do you suggest they impeach again? That would be incredible. I hope another is coming, please dear Lord.
Are you also disputing that Veritas' videos are fake as well?
If the evidence is there, sure go ahead. "Abuse of Power" doesn't constitute "bringing the heat" in my book. Either bring the heat or don't do it at all unless the Dems are intentionally trying to help him win (which I'm ok with as well).I think they should impeach Trump every time he commits an impeachable offense or commits a crime. There are no shortage of them so yes, they should. For example he's named as an unindicted co-conspirator in a felony case where his personal lawyer is currently serving prison time. I would investigate Trump's role in that and impeach if necessary.
I mean surely you don't want Trump to escape punishment if he's committing felonies, right?
Where's the link?
If the evidence is there, sure go ahead. "Abuse of Power" doesn't constitute "bringing the heat" in my book. Either bring the heat or don't do it at all unless the Dems are intentionally trying to help him win (which I'm ok with as well).
Veritas has been debunked thoroughly over the years. They haven't produced a single truthful video.
Do your work, chud.
It is at the point that trying to claim that O'Keefe is an honest actor would be the extraordinary claim demanding extraordinary proof, as he has not spent a single second of time dispensing a single piece of truth.
Nope, in many ways I'm starting to think that Pelosi is paid off by Repubs. Impeachment and the paper ripping were obvious which way the wind would blow. Old Nancy would've never done that crap. Trump got around 20% stronger because of impeachment if you follow betting odds. She warned it would happen a long time ago yet she still caved to the far left crazies. I'm guessing that her bank account is a lot bigger today.Glad you don't have a problem with people rigging elections!
Ok, so you don't have a link from a Green verified Newsguard source? Ok, just say so.Veritas has been debunked thoroughly over the years. They haven't produced a single truthful video.
Do your work, chud.
It is at the point that trying to claim that O'Keefe is an honest actor would be the extraordinary claim demanding extraordinary proof, as he has not spent a single second of time dispensing a single piece of truth.
Nope, in many ways I'm starting to think that Pelosi is paid off by Repubs. Impeachment and the paper ripping were obvious which way the wind would blow. Old Nancy would've never done that crap. Trump got around 20% stronger because of impeachment if you follow betting odds. She warned it would happen a long time ago yet she still caved to the far left crazies. I'm guessing that her bank account is a lot bigger today.
Since you keep claiming Veritas is lying without proof and not providing a link, you are just making things worse for yourself.again, plain observable lies.
why do you pass unmistakable lies off as truth?
Is it the DDH20 consumption?
Nope, in many ways I'm starting to think that Pelosi is paid off by Repubs. Impeachment and the paper ripping were obvious which way the wind would blow. Old Nancy would've never done that crap. Trump got around 20% stronger because of impeachment if you follow betting odds. She warned it would happen a long time ago yet she still caved to the far left crazies. I'm guessing that her bank account is a lot bigger today.
If you read/heard the CSPAN callers after Nancy's debacle, you might rethink things. I'm guessing you haven't read them and the callers who pledged to never vote D again and ones who will be switching parties. But don't let me rain on your parade with actual evidence.Paper ripping? lol. Always funny to be reminded of the sort of lunatic fringe you inhabit where people are dumb enough to think that her ripping a piece of paper means even the slightest thing in an election 9 months from now.
lol.
CPSAN callers as proof of anything. I needed a good laugh.If you read/heard the CSPAN callers after Nancy's debacle, you might rethink things. I'm guessing you haven't read them and the callers who pledged to never vote D again and ones who will be switching parties. But don't let me rain on your parade with actual evidence.
Since you keep claiming Veritas is lying without proof and not providing a link, you are just making things worse for yourself.
If you read/heard the CSPAN callers after Nancy's debacle, you might rethink things. I'm guessing you haven't read them and the callers who pledged to never vote D again and ones who will be switching parties. But don't let me rain on your parade with actual evidence.
Well I hope it'll be the FBI doing it come Jan 2021.They have been trying to do this for 3 yrs... Failing, but trying.
So a scam organization is now making national news outlets like RCP? lol. Funniest joke I've heard all day.Veritas is well-established as a scam organization. You know this. The work is on you to attempt to debunk what is already established truth about O'Keefe. It isn't any other way.