.
Because when you say something like this and it directly contradicts the factual data you end up getting ignored. So if you're going to keep posting stuff like that I'd advise you to back it up with some figures otherwise it is, much like every post with respect to Trinity and anything mobile related you've ever tossed on Anandtech, just hot air. So please, enlighten us with some wisdom other than personal statements.
The difference between synthetic DX11 and game-based DX11 benchmarks is far too big in some games to ignore and looks to be driver related rather than the game playing architectural favorites, particularly Metro2033.
Im not sure how much of an improvement they can make on the same process.
For most gamers, image quality is an important consideration, and Intel has a bad reputation for delivering less-than-stellar visuals—particularly poor anisotropic filtering. Although SemiAccurate reports that the situation is much improved on Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge still suffers from terrible filtering quality.
I sugjest you follow your own advice . your 2 statements above are in conflict.
Advanced Micro Devices gained market share on Intel in worldwide x86 processor shipments during the first quarter on the strength of mobile and desktop shipment growth, Mercury Research said Wednesday.
Intel's market share in the first quarter this year dropped to 80.2 percent from 81 percent in last year's first quarter. AMD's market share rose to 19.1 percent from 18.2 percent, according to Mercury Research
"When you look on it as a quarterly basis, desktop has had some strength relative to mobile," McCarron said. AMD's desktop processor shipments were hurting at the prime of the hard-drive shortage in the fourth quarter last year, and shipments recovered in the first quarter.
Customers also opted for lower-priced laptops, many of which had AMD's chips. Supplies of AMD's A-series chips code-named Llano were restored after manufacturing issues were resolved, McCarron said.
Does anyone have more details about the machine used for testing? ODM? Expected availability?
1600 x 900, eSATa and 14" surely make it look like a contender to be my next machine. Make it 13.3" and I am totally sold.
Edit: On the review itself, not bad, not bad at all.
I didn't, and AMD has done a good job of their power management this go around.
What does this have to do with the expected performance loss during gaming between a 45W Intel quad core with HD4000@650/1250 and a 35W Intel dual core with HD4000@650/1200?
Again, how did you derive the numbers that Trinity would be 30-50% faster that a dual core IB?
lok at sb which was made for the 32nm process. than campare it what came out on intels 32nm. intels haswell is made for 22nm . I think we will see intels IGP at 3x faster than current 22nm IVB. Intel is claiming more but 3x is good enough for me.History is the teacher and recent history shows intel to be vary good at giving what they promise as seen with both SB and now IVB. Haswell will be an IGPU monster.
I'm not sure how HD4000 does as far as image quality is concerned when compared to Llano/Trinity. The HD3000 has its own issues that still haven't been ironed out via driver updates.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/a10-4600m-trinity-piledriver,3202-16.html
Typing this on an i3 SB with HD3000, I can personally vouch for comparatively poor IQ as well as drivers, particularly where gaming is concerned -- which is essentially nonexistent on HD3000 unless you're playing some very old games.
Again, we can't make any true comparisons with respect to price-to-performance until we see some i5 and i3 IBs and the both architectures start shipping out.
You realize that would make it 5770/GTX550ti performance right? That's pretty amazing.
You realize that would make it 5770/GTX550ti performance right? That's pretty amazing.
A 45W Trinity would be able to have higher CPU and iGPU frequencies. That would translate in to higher performance. It would be able to switch to a higher frequency Turbo mode thus increasing performance even more.
A 35W IB Core i5 has less LLC(L3) and perhaps lower iGPU frequencies (not more than 100-150MHz) than 45W Core i7. That translates in to lower iGPU performance even thought it has the same iGPU shader count.
As Inteluser2000 have shown, a 35W SB is 10-20% slower in Games than 45W SB.
We have to wait and see if the same happens with IB. I believe we will see the same behavior.
So to re cop, a 35W Trinity could be more than 30-50% faster in games than 35W IB on average.
No linkwasn't ivy supposed to be 3 times faster than sandy?
heh....we see what happend
You people talk like AMD has accomplished something . LOL the only thing AMD did was trade there fabs off to buy ATI . Not a good smart move
You do the same bringing Haswell to a Trinity vs IB gameIf we can't compare why did you grab the SB image . Ats ivb article has the IVB pic of same thing . you people are good at showing SB when its IVB and trinity were comparring
Not even close.I was thinking more 560ti speeds
Where is 35W Core i5 again ??? not released yet ???Your talking alot . I will wager what ever you want that your full of it. Nice brown eyes
Thats not a link....we don't know if thats an official intel slide or something someone made up on the internet
up to 199% improvements in graphics intensive apps.
affff....... it's that hard to don't belive PR bullshit?
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/di...y_Bridge_Performance_Numbers_to_Partners.html
Is that not accurate? HD4000 does do about 3 times as good as HD2000 in 3DMark Vantage.
so... haswell will be 3 times faster than an HD 2500?
Unless AMD gets its act together. It does seem AMDs IGP advantage is gone with Haswell.