Trinity review

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

LOL_Wut_Axel

Diamond Member
Mar 26, 2011
4,310
8
81
well, based on those benches, trinity is far more powerfull on cpu than llano... it's closer to an mobile i5 2c\4t, while llano baraly beat 2c\2t...

It is not.

AMD isn't gonna get a huge and magical performance boost from a small revision to an x86 CPU architecture that's probably one of the worst ever, only better than Netburst. As far as architecture goes, Llano/K10.5>Bulldozer. Why would you expect a product that's supposed to bring them back on par with Llano to suddenly have a huge (25%+) boost when it's in the same process node and on an architecture only somewhat better than Bulldozer?

Let's be realistic here.

I'll bet that Trinity will be quite powerful if you crossfire it with a discreet GPU.

You'll probably run into a CPU bottleneck if you do that.
 

mrcmtl

Member
Jul 22, 2010
79
1
71
Maybe because they currently can't make their CPUs any faster and improving the IGP wouldn't cause lower efficiency?

And I don't think I'd say a CPU with hugely lower performance is "competitive", especially since most people care more about CPU than GPU performance. It's the exact reason why Intel CPUs are by far more popular than AMD's and the reason why Intel's bad to horrible IGP performance in the past didn't stop them from selling a huge amount of product.

And it's already been proven that the "IGP matters a lot" argument is wrong. Look at Sandy Bridge vs. Llano. Did Llano make Sandy Bridge any less popular? No, right? Then why would that change with Ivy Bridge, which still has excellent CPU performance and now an okay-ish IGP? Less of a reason for the very few people that care about gaming performance to buy AMD anyway, especially since Intel's brand is more recognized and they're very competitive in pricing.

Get Bobcat's engineering team to design and TSMC to manufacture a mainstream APU for AMD and then you'll see a truly great product.

As it stands, AMD's only true great products come out of their GPU division.

The new power efficient A10 is now within mobile i3 performance territory. And I would think that the standard version of the A10 will be close to mobile i5. Then I wouldn't call that a CPU with "hugely lower performance". If Trinity can follow Llano with its prices in current laptops, I would take an A10 500$ laptop over an i3 any day.
 

leper84

Senior member
Dec 29, 2011
989
29
86
And I don't think I'd say a CPU with hugely lower performance is "competitive", especially since most people care more about CPU than GPU performance. It's the exact reason why Intel CPUs are by far more popular than AMD's and the reason why Intel's bad to horrible IGP performance in the past didn't stop them from selling a huge amount of product.

Contradiction- if the GPU side of the equation isn't important, what exactly is Intel doing with Ivy Bridge?

In my opinion, Intel's horrid GPU performance in the past didn't stop them from dominating the market because AMD had no worthwhile integrated GPU to compete with. The only reason Intel would dedicate so much of IB to a gigantic jump in graphics performance is AMD's (potential) success with Llano.

I'll call it right now. If Trinity gains (and loses) nothing over Llano other than stable, full volume supply... it will be a smash hit. A home-run in the exact market that matters the most now- mobile.
 
Last edited:

LOL_Wut_Axel

Diamond Member
Mar 26, 2011
4,310
8
81
The new power efficient A10 is now within mobile i3 performance territory. And I would think that the standard version of the A10 will be close to mobile i5. Then I wouldn't call that a CPU with "hugely lower performance". If Trinity can follow Llano with its prices in current laptops, I would take an A10 500$ laptop over an i3 any day.

No, it is not.

And good look getting an A10 laptop for $500 when laptops featuring the lower-end A8 (3500M) started at $600-650.
 

LOL_Wut_Axel

Diamond Member
Mar 26, 2011
4,310
8
81
Contradiction- if the GPU side of the equation isn't important, what exactly is Intel doing with Ivy Bridge?

In my opinion, Intel's horrid GPU performance in the past didn't stop them from dominating the market because AMD had no worthwhile integrated GPU to compete with. The only reason Intel would dedicate so much of IB to a gigantic jump in graphics performance is AMD's (potential) success with Llano.

I'll call it right now. If Trinity gains nothing over Llano other than stable, full volume supply... it will be a smash hit. A home-run in the exact market that matters the most now- mobile.

I already answered this. Read again:

Maybe because they currently can't make their CPUs any faster and improving the IGP wouldn't cause lower efficiency
And what success does Llano have to show for? Sandy Bridge is still selling huge amounts better, and it's exactly in laptops where there's the bigger market share gap between AMD and Intel (as opposed to desktops).

And the volume argument is getting old. AMD's Llano APUs have had more than their decent share of exposure. In most retail stores there's a significant number of Llano laptops yet they get outsold by Intel by a huge amount. Surely if your argument about IGP performance was true then that would be reflected in sales. I work in a retail store and I can tell you right now almost no one cares about GPU performance on laptops. Intel is improving IGP performance because they can't increase CPU performance any more right now and improving the IGP is where they'd get the biggest performance gains without any decrease in efficiency.

And again, just like today in the future you'll be able to get a laptop with a Core i3 or i5 and a discrete, switchable AMD or NVIDIA GPU that blows away Trinity when it comes to overall performance for little price difference.
 
Last edited:

mrcmtl

Member
Jul 22, 2010
79
1
71
No, it is not.

And good look getting an A10 laptop for $500 when laptops featuring the lower-end A8 (3500M) started at $600-650.

The A10 is scoring over 8k in Cinebench R10 and over 2800 in 3DMark06 CPU, i3 scores the same. Yes, the A10 loses in single-threaded but at least it now catches the i3 in multithreaded while destroying it in iGPU within the same power envelope. Also, I saw an A8 laptop for 500$ 3 months after Llano's launch. If Trinity starts appearing on shelves in June, then prices should get close to current Llano prices for back to school season.
 

LOL_Wut_Axel

Diamond Member
Mar 26, 2011
4,310
8
81
The A10 is scoring over 8k in Cinebench R10 and over 2800 in 3DMark06 CPU, i3 scores the same. Yes, the A10 loses in single-threaded but at least it now catches the i3 in multithreaded while destroying it in iGPU within the same power envelope. Also, I saw an A8 laptop for 500$ 3 months after Llano's launch. If Trinity starts appearing on shelves in June, then prices should get close to current Llano prices for back to school season.

Oh, so you mean it's AS fast as the slowest mainstream Intel CPU in multi-threaded. Too bad it's still a huge amount slower in single-threaded, and that matters as much if not more to the average consumer. So in reality, it's still much slower overall. Back to square zero.

Too bad most consumers don't care for the superior-but-still-only-okay IGP, either, since they don't care about gaming on their laptops in the first place.

And if you see A10 laptops for $500, you'll probably see i3 or i5 laptops with something like an HD 7670M for $600-650, and those will have a huge amount more CPU and GPU performance without trading in battery life because of switchable graphics. With Trinity you'll get what you pay for, just like with Llano.
 

Ventanni

Golden Member
Jul 25, 2011
1,432
142
106
It wouldn't surprise me if you start seeing SB laptops pretty dirt cheap right now as PC makers begin to sell their inventories off in favor of IB. Not that that's a bad thing. SB is still a solid choice for a laptop.
 

leper84

Senior member
Dec 29, 2011
989
29
86
I already answered this. Read again:

And what success does Llano have to show for? Sandy Bridge is still selling huge amounts better, and it's exactly in laptops where there's the bigger market share gap between AMD and Intel (as opposed to desktops).

And the volume argument is getting old. AMD's Llano APUs have had more than their decent share of exposure. In most retail stores there's a significant number of Llano laptops yet they get outsold by Intel by a huge amount. Surely if your argument about IGP performance was true then that would be reflected in sales. I work in a retail store and I can tell you right now almost no one cares about GPU performance on laptops. Intel is improving IGP performance because they can't increase CPU performance any more right now and improving the IGP is where they'd get the biggest performance gains without any decrease in efficiency.

And again, just like today in the future you'll be able to get a laptop with a Core i3 or i5 and a discrete, switchable AMD or NVIDIA GPU that blows away Trinity when it comes to overall performance for little price difference.

As to your self quote- Occam's Razor?

As to your anecdotal evidence of Llano's failure... umm what?

Forbes: AMD Can Reach $8 On Market Share Gains In Notebooks And Servers

Saying Llano and the APU strategy is a failure might put you in the same type of minority claiming Bulldozer was a victory.

Switchable graphics are cool for someone posting on this forum, your average person- the overwhelming majority of the market- could give a crap less. APU target market ≠ You. Once your average, oxygen-deprived consumer figures out what Trinity can do and for how much less...
 

mrcmtl

Member
Jul 22, 2010
79
1
71
Oh, so you mean it's AS fast as the slowest mainstream Intel CPU in multi-threaded. Too bad it's still a huge amount slower in single-threaded, and that matters as much if not more to the average consumer. So in reality, it's still much slower overall. Back to square zero.

Too bad most consumers don't care for the superior-but-still-only-okay IGP, either, since they don't care about gaming on their laptops in the first place.

And if you see A10 laptops for $500, you'll probably see i3 or i5 laptops with something like an HD 7670M for $600-650, and those will have a huge amount more CPU and GPU performance without trading in battery life because of switchable graphics. With Trinity you'll get what you pay for, just like with Llano.

I own both an i3 and a Llano laptop, and I can't tell the difference in everyday usage. I can only see a difference when a program with something like a timer is used such as encoding videos. My i3 is about 15% faster in multithreaded. However, the HD3000 is just horrible for games while Llano manages quite well. I also have a friend who bought an i3 with a GT540m. Although it is faster than my Llano in graphics, I would rather have my Llano or i3 without a discrete GPU as it just creates too much heat and consumes more power. Both my laptops are dead silent while surfing the web.
 

LOL_Wut_Axel

Diamond Member
Mar 26, 2011
4,310
8
81
As to your self quote- Occam's Razor?

As to your anecdotal evidence of Llano's failure... umm what?

Forbes: AMD Can Reach $8 On Market Share Gains In Notebooks And Servers

Saying Llano and the APU strategy is a failure might put you in the same type of minority claiming Bulldozer was a victory.

Switchable graphics are cool for someone posting on this forum, your average person- the overwhelming majority of the market- could give a crap less. APU target market ≠ You. Once your average, oxygen-deprived consumer figures out what Trinity can do and for how much less...

It's not a failure, but they haven't really made any ground on Intel. They're focusing on a very small niche in the market. They did improve their power consumption to bring them up to par with Intel, so at least that's one area where they're good and it also happens to be an area that the average consumer will care a lot about.

And funny that you mention the average person, yet you completely forget about the fact that these average people don't care about gaming on their laptops in the first place therefore making Trinity moot. They won't really care about what Trinity can do, because they're not looking to game in their laptops. And what about the very few that do want to game on the go, what's AMD's argument gonna be for them when the HD 4000 is now enough to play something decently graphically demanding like DiRT 3 on Medium?
 

LOL_Wut_Axel

Diamond Member
Mar 26, 2011
4,310
8
81
I own both an i3 and a Llano laptop, and I can't tell the difference in everyday usage. I can only see a difference when a program with something like a timer is used such as encoding videos. My i3 is about 15% faster in multithreaded. However, the HD3000 is just horrible for games while Llano manages quite well. I also have a friend who bought an i3 with a GT540m. Although it is faster than my Llano in graphics, I would rather have my Llano or i3 without a discrete GPU as it just creates too much heat and consumes more power. Both my laptops are dead silent while surfing the web.

Good, but the avg. consumer doesn't care about that.

And an i3 + 540M barely consume any power so you know exactly where you pulled that out from. Your laptop is dead silent while surfing the web? So is my sig laptop right now: the fans are off. Not that big of an achievement. And if you have something with switchable graphics you wouldn't have to sacrifice noise and heat anyway because the discrete GPU can be turned off.
 

mrcmtl

Member
Jul 22, 2010
79
1
71
Good, but the avg. consumer doesn't care about that.

And an i3 + 540M barely consume any power so you know exactly where you pulled that out from. Your laptop is dead silent while surfing the web? So is my sig laptop right now: the fans are off. Not that big of an achievement. And if you have something with switchable graphics you wouldn't have to sacrifice noise and heat anyway because the discrete GPU can be turned off.

If an i3 + GT540m barely consumes any more power then why would manufacturers bundle it with the bigger and heavier 90W adapter? I'm not saying that a dead silent laptop is an achievement, I'm just saying that a laptop with a discrete GPU is just overall more noisy and heavier.
 

Zor Prime

Golden Member
Nov 7, 1999
1,025
589
136
"The Average Consumer, The Average Consumer," ...

Axel, you're on an island and assert you know what all consumers want.

My company has multiple stores in multiple states. Each store has customers come in with distinct purchasing tendencies compared to the other stores we have. Even stores in neighboring states have vast customer purchasing differences.

Somebody is buying.
 

nyker96

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2005
5,630
2
81
I don't think it's a fair comparison bet. trinity A10 and older A8s, since A8s is doing everything at 2,3 while trinity can boost up to 3,2. I think the added performance might just due to a cpu running faster clocks.
 

georgec84

Senior member
May 9, 2011
234
0
71
Looks promising. The question is whether laptop manufacturers will push for and advertise their Trinity offerings.
 

Soulkeeper

Diamond Member
Nov 23, 2001
6,721
145
106
I just read the trinity review and was unimpressed for some reason

I know it's just the laptop review, but for some reason I expected things like 2133 mem(atleast for desktop) and pcie 3.0 support. I mean cmon it's a new socket atleast refresh the chipset.

also it seems to just barely be beating the llano clocked 1GHz lower in some things.
 

Khato

Golden Member
Jul 15, 2001
1,249
321
136
Certainly interesting to at last see how the top-end Trinity performs... but that's by no means a complete picture as the rest of the line-up takes some pretty hefty hits. The A8-4500M and A10-4655M have roughly two-thirds the raw GPU power (whether or not that affects results much will depend upon how bandwidth starved the reviewed A10-4600M is) while the A6-4400M is at half and the 17W A6-4455M is at roughly 40%... Not to mention the only way they get that SKU down to its 17W TDP is by going with only a single module topping out at 2.6GHz turbo. It's going to be quite amusing to see how that compares with the 17W Ivy Bridge SKUs.
 

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
Disappointing gaming performance. HD4000 saw a 30-50% REALIZED increase in performance and Trinity only is 18% faster than Llano. They are pretty close in parity for GPUs, with AMD being slightly faster but Intel has quicksync. A draw IMO. On the CPU side, Intel continues to spank Trinity. Desktop PD will continue to be disappointing, but hopefully will be more power efficient.

Mobile Haswell will probably be the first time we see Intel completely eclipse AMD in IGPs, based on this. Trinity will be AMDs mobile pony for a while now.
 

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
Certainly interesting to at last see how the top-end Trinity performs... but that's by no means a complete picture as the rest of the line-up takes some pretty hefty hits. The A8-4500M and A10-4655M have roughly two-thirds the raw GPU power (whether or not that affects results much will depend upon how bandwidth starved the reviewed A10-4600M is) while the A6-4400M is at half and the 17W A6-4455M is at roughly 40%... Not to mention the only way they get that SKU down to its 17W TDP is by going with only a single module topping out at 2.6GHz turbo. It's going to be quite amusing to see how that compares with the 17W Ivy Bridge SKUs.

Yeah, was thinking the same thing. The cut-down SKUs will be closer to HD3000 GPU performance and still slower than 2c/4t SB parts.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |