Rural areas tend to hold their own and they don't really have much costs, it's mostly farm land. It's the closest you can be to off grid while still being on grid. Typically they only get hydro. The rural areas around my city actually pay more taxes than in town. Part of the tax calculation is frontage so they tend to have much more frontage than a regular residential property in town.Rural areas tax themselves less, knowing that they can mooch off the cities.
Where is this money coming from? Surely not the Northern region.Rural areas tend to hold their own and they don't really have much costs, it's mostly farm land. It's the closest you can be to off grid while still being on grid. Typically they only get hydro. The rural areas around my city actually pay more taxes than in town. Part of the tax calculation is frontage so they tend to have much more frontage than a regular residential property in town.
Where is this money coming from? Surely not the Northern region.
Your tax dollars get returned to you 100% in government services. Rest of us are paying for this. Why is it so hard for you to understand rest of Ontario is subsidizing the North because you cannot generate enough revenue to support the provincial services you need?Again, we pay taxes too, and the service is not free so you still pay if you want to use it and it probably won't be that cheap, probably like $100 or so for a ticket. It will also make it easier for people to go spend money down south, adding to the economy there.
This is a pretty small scale project compared to lot of infrastructure projects that happen in the GTA that my taxes pay for too. The tracks already exist, I rode that train before. The liberals shut it down years back, the conservatives are just bringing it back now.
Dude can't understand net tax burden, but thinks Poillieve will save him. What a joke.
Hahahaha, moocher thinks him being a burden on society is not important.
I invited you to take a shot at cutting the budget, you didn't. You just picked 10% of GDP as tax revenue without considering what would happen.The government is the burden. About 40% of our income goes to them, and it doesn't matter where you live. If they lowered taxes across the board everyone would benefit. They need to spend less.
I invited you to take a shot at cutting the budget, you didn't. You just picked 10% of GDP as tax revenue without considering what would happen.
When is Poilieve going to get his CSIC security clearance?
You're channeling Reagan's deficit exploding ghost. Supply side economics are a complete and utter failure at producing anything but even richer rich people.If he gets the clearance he will be gagged and won't be allowed to talk about it. He's smart by not getting it. The liberals are so caught up on that because they have nothing better on him.
As for where to cut, have a referendum, people pick 10 most important things to them out of this list:
Departments and agencies - Canada.ca
Here is an alphabetical list of links to current Government of Canada Departments, Agencies, Crown Corporations, Special Operating Agencies and other related organizations.www.canada.ca
At the end, top 10 is chosen, rest is abolished.
That would be a good start. Provinces and cities need to do the same.
Next would be to introduce more accountability in overall spending on projects. For example, Arrivescam. Things like that need to stop. For every dollar spent, there needs to be proof that a dollar or more will be generated, or that a dollar could be cut somewhere else. Cuts should always be priority.
If that means we get less services, then so be it. As long as it translates to extra money back in our pockets and in the pockets of business. We need to grow industry here, instead of pushing everything away. One way to do that, is to simply get out of the way, and let industry happen.
What services do you want to give up?The government is the burden. About 40% of our income goes to them, and it doesn't matter where you live. If they lowered taxes across the board everyone would benefit. They need to spend less.
LoL, gagged. Like everyone else can get clearance and talk but not Pierre.If he gets the clearance he will be gagged and won't be allowed to talk about it. He's smart by not getting it. The liberals are so caught up on that because they have nothing better on him.
As for where to cut, have a referendum, people pick 10 most important things to them out of this list:
Departments and agencies - Canada.ca
Here is an alphabetical list of links to current Government of Canada Departments, Agencies, Crown Corporations, Special Operating Agencies and other related organizations.www.canada.ca
At the end, top 10 is chosen, rest is abolished.
That would be a good start. Provinces and cities need to do the same.
Next would be to introduce more accountability in overall spending on projects. For example, Arrivescam. Things like that need to stop. For every dollar spent, there needs to be proof that a dollar or more will be generated, or that a dollar could be cut somewhere else. Cuts should always be priority.
If that means we get less services, then so be it. As long as it translates to extra money back in our pockets and in the pockets of business. We need to grow industry here, instead of pushing everything away. One way to do that, is to simply get out of the way, and let industry happen.
Fucking hell you're astoundingly stupid.If he gets the clearance he will be gagged and won't be allowed to talk about it. He's smart by not getting it. The liberals are so caught up on that because they have nothing better on him.
As for where to cut, have a referendum, people pick 10 most important things to them out of this list:
Departments and agencies - Canada.ca
Here is an alphabetical list of links to current Government of Canada Departments, Agencies, Crown Corporations, Special Operating Agencies and other related organizations.www.canada.ca
At the end, top 10 is chosen, rest is abolished.
That would be a good start. Provinces and cities need to do the same.
Next would be to introduce more accountability in overall spending on projects. For example, Arrivescam. Things like that need to stop. For every dollar spent, there needs to be proof that a dollar or more will be generated, or that a dollar could be cut somewhere else. Cuts should always be priority.
If that means we get less services, then so be it. As long as it translates to extra money back in our pockets and in the pockets of business. We need to grow industry here, instead of pushing everything away. One way to do that, is to simply get out of the way, and let industry happen.
Specifically, which Harper policies benefited you personally?The worse part is that the other person running for leadership, Mark Carney, is even worse! They are both worse than Trudeau too, so we really can't let the liberals win again no matter who ends up leader. The entire regime needs to go and we need to turn the page on this chapter and get the country back on track. As much as I didn't like Harper that much, we were so much better under him, and we need to bring those times back. He knew how to run things. Poilievre sounds like he does too.
Hopefully we get an early election, but I'm not counting on it.
It's not about one single policy, just better governing in general, and not having the country in record deficit, soaring costs of living, higher crime etc. Overall we just had better quality of life all around. The biggest 2 things are crime rate and economy. Those were under control until about 2015. Thing is, Harper actually called this, and he turned out to be right.Specifically, which Harper policies benefited you personally?
Have to agree. Don't know him but based on his astrological profile, he might give a crap about doing something for the people.Maxime Bernier would be even better... but that's just a pipe dream, not going to happen.