Yeah it is really starting to get that feel to it. Even Fox seems to be on board. The sacrificial lamb.
Yeah it is really starting to get that feel to it. Even Fox seems to be on board. The sacrificial lamb.Just saw a lawyer on CNN say that Since Jr isn't part of government he has little to fear legally unless he lies under oath. They're sacrificing Jr since the rest (Jared, etc) have much more to fear.
Bet they're not mentioning Jared at all right?
Dirt is dirt, I don't give two shits where it comes from. If you're clean, no matter where people go, they can't get dirt on you.
Been switching between Fox, CNN, and Msnbc. Would of never thought Fox would be hammering Jr. more than the other two.
Escape Goat.
That's just them covering their asses in case it blows up in their face. Jared must be protected as long as possible as he has the highest security clearances and is Drumpf's right hand man.They didn't focus on him, but it was brought up that he failed to fill out his security clearance forms correctly.
I also don't understand how collusion in furtherance of a crime would not be illegal. Fox is even implying that the massive amounts of lies (their words) coming from the campaign is sure making it look like the campaign participated in the dissemination of stolen information. Seems like a crime to me.
Dirt is dirt, but it matters if the dirt was obtained legally or illegally. In the case of the Russian government obtaining dirt on an American political candidate, there is very little chance that they would come by such information through anything other than hacking or other forms of espionage.
It's amazing the sleaziness that you guys will now tolerate in the name of defending Trump. Not a chance any of this would have been remotely OK if done by a dem.
Dirt is dirt, but it matters if the dirt was obtained legally or illegally. In the case of the Russian government obtaining dirt on an American political candidate, there is very little chance that they would come by such information through anything other than hacking or other forms of espionage
It's amazing the sleaziness that you guys will now tolerate in the name of defending Trump. Not a chance any of this would have been remotely OK if done by a dem.
So far acknowledged in attendance: Trump Jr., Kushner, Manafort, Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, Akhmetshin and publicist Rob Goldstone, who helped set up the meeting. A source familiar with the circumstances told CNN there were at least two other people in the room as well, a translator and a representative of the Russian family who had asked Goldstone to set up the meeting.
CNN: At least 8 people in the room at Trump Tower Russia meeting.
I'm done.
Who knows how they came of it. I expect we're doing the exact same thing to Russia, gathering dirt on them. I expect if/when the time comes that Putin is vulnerable, we'll be going to his detractors (hopefully better concealed than this) and offering them dirt also. The important thing to me isn't if Russia (who I already expect to be obtaining dirt on Pols both legally and illegally, just like we I expect are) has dirt, or how it was obtained, it's that there is dirt to collect on a POTUS candidate to begin with. I know it's crazy, but, I expect Politicians to be clean, or at least that's my desire. So if the Russians, or anyone else really, actually turns up damaging dirt on any political candidate, I really care not where it came from, I care that it is what it is in the first place.
If they have credible audio and/or video, or credible e-mail trail of someone in the Trump campaign, or, someone acting to support the Trump campaign who was actually supposed to be doing so (not a false flag Dem operation), asking the Russians (or anyone else) to do something illegal, or, engaging in quid pro quo where they get dirt and give them consideration that the US would not otherwise bestow down the road, I have no problems with that person being legally - and socially - sanctioned. Why would I?
Now, when WikiLeaks, who has a 100% accuracy record, had item after item about Team Billary, and the entire mainstream media save for Fox was doing their absolute best to parrot the It's Russia! Team Billary supplied cover, you guys were in here screaming that that was BS and the media and public had a right to know, right? I'll just say up front, I don't remember that. I remember mitigation after excuse after dodge. But now, now after Team Blue lost 2016 (after expecting to win big), we need to go full tilt OMG Russia! and get it all investigated? Spare me the fake concern man...
Poor Fredo.Yeah it is really starting to get that feel to it. Even Fox seems to be on board. The sacrificial lamb.
^LOL
Dirt is dirt, but it matters if the dirt was obtained legally or illegally. In the case of the Russian government obtaining dirt on an American political candidate, there is very little chance that they would come by such information through anything other than hacking or other forms of espionage.
It's amazing the sleaziness that you guys will now tolerate in the name of defending Trump. Not a chance any of this would have been remotely OK if done by a dem.
It's just a simple fact that you're obliged to shill for the trumps to repay their shilling for the klan.
Damn, not a member for them either! My lord Fail, look how wrong you continue to be!
Who knows how they came of it. I expect we're doing the exact same thing to Russia, gathering dirt on them. I expect if/when the time comes that Putin is vulnerable, we'll be going to his detractors (hopefully better concealed than this) and offering them dirt also. The important thing to me isn't if Russia (who I already expect to be obtaining dirt on Pols both legally and illegally, just like we I expect are) has dirt, or how it was obtained, it's that there is dirt to collect on a POTUS candidate to begin with. I know it's crazy, but, I expect Politicians to be clean, or at least that's my desire. So if the Russians, or anyone else really, actually turns up damaging dirt on any political candidate, I really care not where it came from, I care that it is what it is in the first place.
If they have credible audio and/or video, or credible e-mail trail of someone in the Trump campaign, or, someone acting to support the Trump campaign who was actually supposed to be doing so (not a false flag Dem operation), asking the Russians (or anyone else) to do something illegal, or, engaging in quid pro quo where they get dirt and give them consideration that the US would not otherwise bestow down the road, I have no problems with that person being legally - and socially - sanctioned. Why would I?
Now, when WikiLeaks, who has a 100% accuracy record, had item after item about Team Billary, and the entire mainstream media save for Fox was doing their absolute best to parrot the It's Russia! Team Billary supplied cover, you guys were in here screaming that that was BS and the media and public had a right to know, right? I'll just say up front, I don't remember that. I remember mitigation after excuse after dodge. But now, now after Team Blue lost 2016 (after expecting to win big), we need to go full tilt OMG Russia! and get it all investigated? Spare me the fake concern man...
Who knows how they came of it.
I expect we're doing the exact same thing to Russia, gathering dirt on them. I expect if/when the time comes that Putin is vulnerable, we'll be going to his detractors (hopefully better concealed than this) and offering them dirt also. The important thing to me isn't if Russia (who I already expect to be obtaining dirt on Pols both legally and illegally, just like we I expect are) has dirt, or how it was obtained, it's that there is dirt to collect on a POTUS candidate to begin with. I know it's crazy, but, I expect Politicians to be clean, or at least that's my desire. So if the Russians, or anyone else really, actually turns up damaging dirt on any political candidate, I really care not where it came from, I care that it is what it is in the first place.
Rather evident your arguments are certainly ~klan quality.
Lordy
I'd say your arguments are Lib quality but it looks like Libs don't like you either? O'Bummer....
You must realize what a massive failure Trump is at the genetic level? You can hate on libs and still renounce Trump at the same time you know...Don't worry, Don't worry, OMG Russia! is going to work. 2018 will be a Dem blowout against Reps.