Trump 6 point lead

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,281
9,365
146
The only site I follow and trust is 538. They are extremely conservative/guarded in their ratings and look at a ridiculous cross section of polls. Throw out the LA times poll (they have always given trump a lead even when he clearly should not have one). 538 gives him a 1/3 chance of winning.That is uncomfortably high for me, but they are also banking on small polling (1+ ) error. Other sites have trump's chances of winning being generally less than 20% and some say essentially zero.

^^^ This. Predicting the future is obviously a dark and uncertain art outside of Marvel movies, or some such, but Nate Silver's 538 is the best and most considered there is, imho, as well. As much as I can, in Nate I trust.
 

Matthiasa

Diamond Member
May 4, 2009
5,755
23
81
They are actually banking on not only large polling error but a large polling error that is highly correlated between states. If you look at their model Trump's chances are almost entirely driven by that uncertainty. Without it they would have Clinton at 90%+. Other aggregators think they are overestimating uncertainty, which is why her odds are much better there.

I think 538 is a great site and I love how transparent they are, but it seems that no matter the outcome of this election their model will need revision. It's hard for me to believe that in an electorate this polarized that Clinton has really gone from a 90% chance of winning to a 51% chance of losing back to a 90% chance of winning back to a 66% chance. Regardless of who you think will win that's not likely to have actually happened.

You understand those changes in winning percents come down to low single digit percent changes in polling averages and are based on standard uncertainty given a particular sample size?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,527
136
You understand those changes in winning percents come down to low single digit percent changes in polling averages and are based on standard uncertainty given a particular sample size?

They do come down to single percent changes but they are not based on standard uncertainty for a given sample size at least in any way as we generally use the term. 538 is using a probabilistic model that uses polling margins of error of course but also includes trend line adjustment, weighting by perceived pollster quality, etc. Important to remember too that their main prediction is not a 'nowcast' but a projection of Election Day. Having a prediction of a static day in the future change so much, repeatedly, indicates you are not accounting for noise well, at least to me.

I imagine this is because it is an aggressive model that doesn't think much that where the race has been in the past should inform their probability now and that's probably wrong. Just from a gut perspective the race seems to have indicated a steady low to middle digit Clinton lead basically the whole way. If you want to talk about what odds that gave her of winning that's great, but it is unlikely to mean 90% one day and 49% a bit later.
 

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,493
3,159
136
In the past years of POTUS polling stats, polls and projections have been quite accurate in the end and after the fact.
With the only addition, that the one who was up by 1 or 2 before election day actually ended up winning by 4, 5 or more.
Hillary's advantage is that nearly all the polls, most, have consistently shown her up during the entire cycle.
Again, the only addition was her lead ranging from double digit down to single digit.
But double or single, she was most always ahead of Trump with few exception.
And here we are, one day away, and nothing has really changed with that trend or with her maintaining that lead over Trump.
If you were betting actual goods, cash or jewels or the new SUV, would you bet that Trump wins? Considering the polls and the history of polling accuracy? Especially during presidential elections? Would you still make that bet?
Do you feel lucky..... well do you?

PS.
And I still have my prediction.
That Hillary will carry Iowa.
I think that is one state where the polls will prove wrong.
And Iowa has a much higher Hispanic voting public than the media gives it credit for.
They will turn out.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,527
136
A 2% change in the popular vote can change it from 90% to 49%.
Also... guide to 538 stats

I strongly suggest you actually read up on this and that guide is a good starter.

A 2% change in the final outcome might be able to do that in certain circumstances (although not in these) but as I have said to you already 538 is not giving a final outcome, they are giving a probabilistic estimate of that outcome. With a relatively static electorate repeated swings that large are unlikely.

Not sure why this is even being argued.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
69,557
27,861
136
How come? He's a seaman.
He won't say. He just bitches about every program set up to help people in the same boat he's out of. Then he proclaims his support for politicians who will toss him anchors while he drowns.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,527
136
He won't say. He just bitches about every program set up to help people in the same boat he's out of. Then he proclaims his support for politicians who will toss him anchors while he drowns.

It was very strange and very, very sad to see him complain about how he couldn't afford health care and then when confronted with the idea that the primary reason was because of the policies of people he voted for he just shut down.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,821
29,574
146
It was very strange and very, very sad to see him complain about how he couldn't afford health care and then when confronted with the idea that the primary reason was because of the policies of people he voted for he just shut down.

I agree, it's sad and unfortunate. I do hope things turn out for him and I don't mean this in a patronizing way. Dude and many like him could use more bleeding hearts in this country honestly looking out for their best interests.
 
Last edited:

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,752
4,562
136
It was very strange and very, very sad to see him complain about how he couldn't afford health care and then when confronted with the idea that the primary reason was because of the policies of people he voted for he just shut down.

Man that's horrible. I hope his situation improves.
 

bshole

Diamond Member
Mar 12, 2013
8,315
1,215
126
Sold my long term capital gain stocks and bought Nov SPY puts to insure the short term ones while I hold. Markets are super complacent, and a Trump win could be like Brexit on steroids. No need to be a hero as the increased probability gets priced in.

I pulled my 401k completely out of the market a month or two back (around 700k). My Roths and my wifes 401k are still in the market. This puts about half of my total retirement savings OFF the market. I am betting on a total market implosion. If the DJIA drops to 9K or so, I could be set for retirement within a year. I have been on the wrong end of every other market swing. That ends for me this year....
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,527
136
I pulled my 401k completely out of the market a month or two back (around 700k). My Roths and my wifes 401k are still in the market. This puts about half of my total retirement savings OFF the market. I am betting on a total market implosion. If the DJIA drops to 9K or so, I could be set for retirement within a year. I have been on the wrong end of every other market swing. That ends for me this year....

I honestly don't mean this in a mean way or anything, but if you've always been wrong about timing the market then maybe it's not for you because it's not your area of expertise? I know I would never try to time the market because even people who do it for a living usually fail.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,821
29,574
146
I honestly don't mean this in a mean way or anything, but if you've always been wrong about timing the market then maybe it's not for you because it's not your area of expertise? I know I would never try to time the market because even people who do it for a living usually fail.

considering the projected bump after a Hillary win, that would be a big loss on a low projection of 3% gains. On $700k, that evaporates a year's minimum wage salary worth of gains. D:
 
Reactions: ivwshane

bshole

Diamond Member
Mar 12, 2013
8,315
1,215
126
I honestly don't mean this in a mean way or anything, but if you've always been wrong about timing the market then maybe it's not for you because it's not your area of expertise? I know I would never try to time the market because even people who do it for a living usually fail.


Eski,
Do you believe Clinton will take down Assad after she assumes office? If so, what do you think Russia's response will be? Will Russia's response tend to crater the market or make it go up? Many people think Hillary was just blowing hot air when she spoke of taking down Assad and honestly they could be 100% correct but even if they are.....

......we are due for a bear market after this super long bull market. Look at the pattern for the last 24 years..... it is almost cyclical. 8 year bull/bear/8 year bull/bear/8 year bull/....

The thing that is missing is the bubble. I haven't been able to identify a bubble in the market anywhere and that is worrisome.
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,035
5,338
136
so where is toothless? more shrubbery to cut? seamen to tug? people want to know... glory glory hallelujah, his boats go tugging on.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,527
136
Eski,
Do you believe Clinton will take down Assad after she assumes office? If so, what do you think Russia's response will be? Will Russia's response tend to crater the market or make it go up? Many people think Hillary was just blowing hot air when she spoke of taking down Assad and honestly they could be 100% correct but even if they are.....

......we are due for a bear market after this super long bull market. Look at the pattern for the last 24 years..... it is almost cyclical. 8 year bull/bear/8 year bull/bear/8 year bull/....

The thing that is missing is the bubble. I haven't been able to identify a bubble in the market anywhere and that is worrisome.

What I'm saying is that I have very little confidence in my ability to project the S&P 500 in the short term fashion necessary to time the market. If I DID have that ability (and for that matter, if YOU do) then all you need to do is document that fact ahead of time in a way that can be shown to investors/fund managers and you could quickly become a wealthy man doing it. Sadly, I don't. I doubt you do either.

As I've said before the best thing you can do with your money long term is park it in a low fee index fund and forget it exists.
 

bshole

Diamond Member
Mar 12, 2013
8,315
1,215
126
What I'm saying is that I have very little confidence in my ability to project the S&P 500 in the short term fashion necessary to time the market. If I DID have that ability (and for that matter, if YOU do) then all you need to do is document that fact ahead of time in a way that can be shown to investors/fund managers and you could quickly become a wealthy man doing it. Sadly, I don't. I doubt you do either.

As I've said before the best thing you can do with your money long term is park it in a low fee index fund and forget it exists.

Yea and enjoy that pathetic 5% ROI that I have had. This is my first time trying to time that market. I got out in the 17ks so I AM ALREADY DOWN by a very substantial chunk. Give that I am already down, it is too late to get back in now. At the very least, I have to wait for the mid 17ks again.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
82,854
17,365
136
^^^ This. Predicting the future is obviously a dark and uncertain art outside of Marvel movies, or some such, but Nate Silver's 538 is the best and most considered there is, imho, as well. As much as I can, in Nate I trust.

its particularly difficult this time around. I suspect theres an awful lot of people lying on polls and we may get some shocking results when voting actually starts.
 

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
7,596
7,854
136
Eski,
Do you believe Clinton will take down Assad after she assumes office? If so, what do you think Russia's response will be? Will Russia's response tend to crater the market or make it go up? Many people think Hillary was just blowing hot air when she spoke of taking down Assad and honestly they could be 100% correct but even if they are.....

......we are due for a bear market after this super long bull market. Look at the pattern for the last 24 years..... it is almost cyclical. 8 year bull/bear/8 year bull/bear/8 year bull/....

The thing that is missing is the bubble. I haven't been able to identify a bubble in the market anywhere and that is worrisome.
Car loans, student loans.
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,035
5,338
136
^^^ This. Predicting the future is obviously a dark and uncertain art outside of Marvel movies, or some such, but Nate Silver's 538 is the best and most considered there is, imho, as well. As much as I can, in Nate I trust.
he was WAY off on the Cubs chances tho, something around 26% going into game 6. I trust him too, but that was just a silly number
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,821
29,574
146
Yea and enjoy that pathetic 5% ROI that I have had. This is my first time trying to time that market. I got out in the 17ks so I AM ALREADY DOWN by a very substantial chunk. Give that I am already down, it is too late to get back in now. At the very least, I have to wait for the mid 17ks again.

so what you're saying is that you are better off by getting out while things are high but getting cheaper, and waiting to get back when once they are high again.

Sounds like...a plan. Seriously dude--leave your money in there and just keep buying MORE and MORE and MORE as things get cheaper and cheaper and cheaper. Every time you sell a share, someone out there is buying them. You'd probably rather be the buyer that's picking up cheaper shares.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,821
29,574
146
its particularly difficult this time around. I suspect theres an awful lot of people lying on polls and we may get some shocking results when voting actually starts.

well, that's pretty much what 538's rather bearish projections take into account--why they see a greater chance for Trump than pretty much anyone else. So, the best model out there for assuming bad polling data into the numbers still gives Hillary a substantial chance at a win.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,821
29,574
146
he was WAY off on the Cubs chances tho, something around 26% going into game 6. I trust him too, but that was just a silly number

any attempt at prediction of baseball games is just silly to being with. Each game and really--each 3-5 game series in a season, or 7 game in the playoffs--is more or less an "either team can win" probability from game to game or series to series. That's why we need 162 games to assign some legit probability to effectively measure the strength of each team.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |