Bolton: - "Had Democratic impeachment advocates not been so obsessed with their Ukraine blitzkrieg in 2019, had they taken the time to inquire more systematically about Trump’s behavior across his entire foreign policy, the impeachment outcome might well have been different,"
Huh?..So Bolton is claiming that he had information that would require removing the president from power, but that he declined to provide this information to the public because Democrats wouldn't subpoena him. Is that about right?
You coward!...Bolton deserves to be consigned to the ash-heap of history.
Nope. If something actionable was found, Bolton just has to say "I made that part up".Do public servants not have a duty to report such corrupt actions?
Is there nothing in statute here?
By not reporting the crime, is he an assistant to it?
I mean Trump is claiming that the book is full of classified information. It can’t be classified unless it is true.
Do public servants not have a duty to report such corrupt actions?
Is there nothing in statute here?
By not reporting the crime, is he an assistant to it?
A Pro-Trump book would not be bought to be read, it would be bought to be seen. It would be like a MAGA hat. Not worn to be useful, but like the colorful stripes on a snake, to warn others that you are poisonous.Probably fair to say any pro-Trump book wouldn't be a big seller.
The Venn diagram of Trump supporters and book readers would have a very small overlap.
Yea, our standing in the world was so bad under Obama.For crissakes, it's even worse than that. Not only did Trump not know the UK had nuclear weapons, he told Theresa May and her National Security Advisor this.
What in the actual fuk is this thing doing talking to foreign leaders? Can't we just have someone else do it?
What's next? We're going to hear that when speaking with President Macron,Trump said: "Terrific country you have here. Love it. Only problem is people are talking really funny and I can't understand what they're saying. Don't you guys speak English here?"
Do public servants not have a duty to report such corrupt actions?
Is there nothing in statute here?
By not reporting the crime, is he an assistant to it?
Republicans are going to have to decide between the two current excuses that Bolton's book is both lies and classified. Because if it's lies, then it's not classified, and if it's classified then it isn't lies.
I think you're forgetting a third excuse...Bolton is a deep state plant so must be silenced!Republicans are going to have to decide between the two current excuses that Bolton's book is both lies and classified. Because if it's lies, then it's not classified, and if it's classified then it isn't lies.
Republicans are going to have to decide between the two current excuses that Bolton's book is both lies and classified. Because if it's lies, then it's not classified, and if it's classified then it isn't lies.
You do realize Trump has said that everthing that comes out of his mouth is classified??You do realize that a book can contain lies and classified information at the same time right?
Hell publish it and let the courts and people settle it.
You do realize Trump has said that everthing that comes out of his mouth is classified??
All the Republicans and pcgeek11 want to happen is for the book to never be published!!
Trump says a lot of things... so.
You obviously didn't read my prior post in this very thread.
I quoted it above for your reading pleasure.
Are you saying that the book couldn't contain both lies and classified information?
If you were to take 100 random statements from Bolton's book and Trump says all 100 are lies, how many of those statements do you think Bolton is actually lying about? And even before you answer I am going to guess that you're going to respond with an "I don't know" or "I don't feel like telling you" which is quite revealing (to me at least).
I'll just say for truth None of us knows. So your guess is correct. I don't know, not even enough to guess and neither do you.
Your question is impossible to answer any other way.
we know that Trump is a pathological liar and while i disagree with Bolton politically, he isn't a known liar. not that anyone should be surprised by any of what's been leaked so far, it all fits the bill.
Bolton must be dancing, the lawsuit probably gets him another million in sales.
Are you saying that the book couldn't contain both lies and classified information?
Well he’s allowed to tweet as asinine comments as he wants. But if the lawyers argue the same thing in court, yeah it will be laughed out of it quicklyThat is what I see going on here. The book already went through the approval process and changed the material that was deemed classified, but now because it is unflattering to the President he has declared some new things classified to shut the book down. Surely this is abuse of power? It all seems rather arbitrary. How can we really have freedom of speech when the President can simply declare some speech to be off limits?