Trump allegedly has a child with his housekeeper

[ch33zw1z]

Case in point. My God you're stupid.

Sorry you feel that way, and fuck your feels.

 

[cytg111]

Case in point. My God you're stupid.

If you cant see he is right you are a seriously lost cause, if you cant see what the birtherism crap was all about you are a lost cause. You see someone pointing this out and you default to 'both sides' rhetoric ... gtfo braindrained lemming.

 

[jackstar7]

Yup...I was surprised by all the race baiter scum in this country as well.

No you weren't. You see them everywhere.

I know I'm ignored, but you are such a blight on this board. You have maybe 1 good post in 20, but the reputation you've rightly earned means that 1 is going to be ignored. You need to re-brand. Maybe start an alt or something and try coming in fresh.

 

[BAMAVOO]

Again, who cares what the man did 30 years ago? Clinton did it in office and you guys cheered him on. He paid $850,000 of hush money. :Let him do hid job, which he is doing very well.

 

[ElMonoDelMar]

Let him do hid job, which he is doing very well.

I just can't get my head wrapped around people that think Trump has objectively done a good job in office. He's a trainwreck.

 

[trenchfoot]

I just can't get my head wrapped around people that think Trump has objectively done a good job in office. He's a trainwreck.

More inclusively, Trump's trainwereck is filled with money laundering Russian oligarchs, a support base of gullible loonies, sycophant surrogates, advisers that have nothing to do except pluck their eyebrows bald because Trump ignores their sage advice in favor of his own "genius mind", a Speaker of the House and a Senate Majority Leader who gave up every ideological and economic principle they stood for in order to advance their own desires to bless the rich with the spoils gained from robbing the middle class and the poor......I mean, the only thing that Trump has done "really well" is to screw things up here at home and abroad so badly, yet in a mysteriously "coincidental" way all of these bad things he's done to us and our allies is very beneficial to Russia (Putin).

The Repubs in the legislature see this going on yet do absolutely nothing to stop Trump from carrying on this way simply because they are using his incompetence, his megalomania and his plethora of other frailties to accomplish their own vile agendas that in reality work directly against the hopes and dreams of the working class voters who put these crooks in office.

 

[brycejones]

My God I'm stupid.

FTFY to remove the projection

 

[jackstar7]

Again, who cares what the man did 30 years ago? Clinton did it in office and you guys cheered him on. He paid $850,000 of hush money. :Let him do hid job, which he is doing very well.

Your delusions and projections are well-structured, but avoid stiff breezes and pins lest the house of cards inside your bubble fall to ruin.

 

[Lanyap]

Case in point. My God you're stupid.

Now look what you've done. You've got them all riled up over stupid shit.

 

[Fern]

-snip-

1) We know he likes to have affairs.
2) We know he likes to have unprotected sex.
3) We know his denials are meaningless because he is a pathological liar.
4) We know the denials of the women involved are meaningless because we already have evidence of payoff agreements between Trump and other women that required them to lie if asked about the affair.

I don't think we know #2. I mean you guys have persistently claimed Trump is a germophobe. Her claim that they had unprotected sex is the one thing that makes me have some doubt about her story. Heck, I'm not a germophobe and I wouldn't touch her with somebody else's pecker.

Fern

 

[Indus]

I don't think we know #2. I mean you guys have persistently claimed Trump is a germophobe. Her claim that they had unprotected sex is the one thing that makes me have some doubt about her story. Heck, I'm not a germophobe and I wouldn't touch her with somebody else's pecker.

Fern

Have you seen Stormy Daniels? I wouldn't touch her with a 10 feet pole, much less pay $130k.

Try Brianna Banks instead and that's money well spent.

 

[fskimospy]

I don't think we know #2. I mean you guys have persistently claimed Trump is a germophobe. Her claim that they had unprotected sex is the one thing that makes me have some doubt about her story. Heck, I'm not a germophobe and I wouldn't touch her with somebody else's pecker.

Fern

No, Trump claims he is a germophobe, no one else. I’m unaware of anyone who has had sex with him who says he used protection.

If that’s what makes you doubt her then you are woefully misinformed.

 

[alien42]

I'm going to need substantial proof before I buy into this. Sure it's possible but things are in such turmoil that almost anything said is sold.

is this enough proof?

the actual AMI contract - http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/08/24/sajudin.ami.pdf

"Source shall provide AMI with information regarding Donald Trump's illegitimate child..."

 

[interchange]

is this enough proof?

the actual AMI contract - http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/08/24/sajudin.ami.pdf

"Source shall provide AMI with information regarding Donald Trump's illegitimate child..."

Strange to bump this I think. The contract offers no proof. Actually it offers something very interesting, namely that AMI doesn't pay him if they don't publish the story. So they had nothing to lose in offering this contract to a crackpot except time. Him getting the offer says little about its credibility. While the basic premise is plausible, no one has offered anything credible to substantiate this story.

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

is this enough proof?

the actual AMI contract - http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/08/24/sajudin.ami.pdf

"Source shall provide AMI with information regarding Donald Trump's illegitimate child..."

A statement from the doorman's ex-wife

He's infamous for making up stories," Sajudin's ex-wife Nikki Benfatto said to the New York Daily News. "He's seen the chupacabra. He's seen Bigfoot. One of our friends who passed away, he saw him too, walking down the street."

 

[fskimospy]

Strange to bump this I think. The contract offers no proof. Actually it offers something very interesting, namely that AMI doesn't pay him if they don't publish the story. So they had nothing to lose in offering this contract to a crackpot except time. Him getting the offer says little about its credibility. While the basic premise is plausible, no one has offered anything credible to substantiate this story.

As per the story he was paid $30k, so they must have considered him at least minimally credible.

But the third page of the agreement shows that about a month later, the parties signed an amendment that states that Sajudin would be paid $30,000 within five days of receiving the amendment.

That being said, I agree that no other evidence has been presented so far to back it up.

 

[MomentsofSanity]

As per the story he was paid $30k, so they must have considered him at least minimally credible.



That being said, I agree that no other evidence has been presented so far to back it up.

They may have seen him as damaging, not necessarily credible. $30K isn’t a big price to pay in the grand scheme.

 

[1prophet]

Yup, when the black guy got elected, many Americans showed who they really are.

And since it required a very large White majority for him to get elected, twice, it also showed the country could have been moved forward if not for the very powerful race trump card (no pun intended),

the elite rich, including many white liberals like to use as a means of divide and conquer and would refuse to give up, since it is very effective in keeping the lower classes down while picking their pockets.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/lbj-convince-the-lowest-white-man/

President Lyndon B. Johnson once said, "If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."

 

[VRAMdemon]

They may have seen him as damaging, not necessarily credible. $30K isn’t a big price to pay in the grand scheme.

Yeah in the sleazy world of catch & Kill, 30 grand is a small price. I guess, because of Peckers cooperation, he has been released from the agreement? Jesus, opening the National Inquirer safe is going to be like the ending of Cabin in the Woods. AMI may claim to have destroyed it rather than turn it over under subpoena. If they did that, though, I assume the people who originally sold the exclusive rights to AMI will now be free to tell, or to resell, the stories.

I can't imagine any media outlet, least of all the National Enquirer, destroying anything like that. That would be like flushing diamonds down the toilet.

I smell bullshit with this story in the sleazy world of selling bullshit. This is Trumps world though, a world of bullshit peddling, So who knows.

Even if this is true, it won't change anything. Maybe if the child is with an undocumented immigrant it might affect his supporters, but they would just use that as proof that, see.. he isn't racist.

If true.. there is some horrified poor kid out there about to find out that Donald Trump is his or her father

 

[UglyCasanova]

Stuff like this just fuels the fake news fire surrounding CNN (and other media are caught in the crossfire). They have on their front page a rumor with zero evidence. A contract between national inquirer and the doorman to buy he rumor isn’t evidence of anything, but it seems to be passed off as such. The guys credibility in question by the wife who says he’s a pathological liar, the housekeeper denies ever having a relationship with Trump, and National Inquirerer decided not to publish. So why is CNN running with it?

 

[fskimospy]

Stuff like this just fuels the fake news fire surrounding CNN (and other media are caught in the crossfire). They have on their front page a rumor with zero evidence. A contract between national inquirer and the doorman to buy he rumor isn’t evidence of anything, but it seems to be passed off as such. The guys credibility in question by the wife who says he’s a pathological liar, the housekeeper denies ever having a relationship with Trump, and National Inquirerer decided not to publish. So why is CNN running with it?

Because the national inquirer paid a guy $30,000 to keep quiet about a story that would be damaging to Trump. You have a supposedly independent media entity running as basically his PR firm. It’s a big story regardless of whether the actual allegation is true!

Also you know as well as I do the people involved denying it is meaningless.

 

[senseamp]

Tell us again about family values, Republicans

 

[Sunburn74]

I don't think we know #2. I mean you guys have persistently claimed Trump is a germophobe. Her claim that they had unprotected sex is the one thing that makes me have some doubt about her story. Heck, I'm not a germophobe and I wouldn't touch her with somebody else's pecker.

Fern

Odd argument. I'm pretty sure germaphobes are out there having sex like regular people.

Stuff like this just fuels the fake news fire surrounding CNN (and other media are caught in the crossfire). They have on their front page a rumor with zero evidence. A contract between national inquirer and the doorman to buy he rumor isn’t evidence of anything, but it seems to be passed off as such. The guys credibility in question by the wife who says he’s a pathological liar, the housekeeper denies ever having a relationship with Trump, and National Inquirerer decided not to publish. So why is CNN running with it?

CNN is running it because NI has basically been used as Trump's PR firm to hide damaging stories.
The real question is if the story was not damaging as you make it out to be (liar, lots of denials, no physical evidence, etc) why did they pay money?
Also don't forget the number of things the Trump administration has blatantly denied which later were proven to the true. We've reached a point as a society where you just can't believe the wolf criers anymore.

 

[UglyCasanova]

Unless I’m completely reading this wrong they paid him exclusive rights to the story, not hush money. He couldn’t talk about it because then it wouldn’t be exclusive but I’m not reading that at all they are trying to bury it and keep him quiet...?

 

[fskimospy]

If you read the story the vast majority of it is about the Inquirer’s shady practices, not the allegation. I imagine right wing media will try and spin it differently but...well... that’s to be expected.

We should all be outraged that we have what amounts to a secret PR firm for the president pretending to be an actual media outlet.